Copyright © 2024

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Donbas residents increasingly want to return to being part of Ukraine, Bekeshkina says

Devastation in the Donbas, Ukraine brought by the Russian military aggression (Image:
Devastation in the Donbas, Ukraine brought by the Russian military aggression (Image:
Donbas residents increasingly want to return to being part of Ukraine, Bekeshkina says
Edited by: A. N.

Iryna Bekeshkina, director of the Ilko Kucheriv Democratic Initiatives Foundation, says that those who initially supported the Russian occupation of the Donbas did so because they expected that would lead to an improvement in their lives. It hasn’t, and consequently, the sociologist says, ever more of them want again to be part of Ukraine.

Iryna Bekeshkina (Image:
Iryna Bekeshkina (Image:

“Now,” the sociologist says, “people are returning to their accustomed life and want everything to be the same as it was: they even in their majority do not want autonomy for their regions.” What matters is that they not be shot and that they have good jobs.

“I wouldn’t exaggerate their pro-Ukrainian nature, although identification with Ukraine is growing, especially among the young.”

She adds that “the more successful the [Ukrainian] economy will be, the more such attitudes will grow as will their pro-Ukrainian dispositions.” People are tired. They want a clear definition of who and what they are to be.

If their land is to be Ukraine, Bekeshkina says, then they will accept Ukraine. “if it will be Russia, they will accept Russia. But they already understand now that Russia doesn’t want them and therefore they would like to return to their former lives.”

This means that there is a growing practical basis for the recovery of the Donbas, she suggests, although ideologically things may be more difficult because for many in the Russian-occupied regions, their identity is not with Russia but with the USSR.

“Look at how the streets are called there: everything remains as it was in the Soviet Union.”

The situation with regard to Crimea is “much more complicated than with the Donbas,” the sociologist says. On that peninsula, there have been significant “demographic changes,” with the Putin government introducing ever more people from Russia [by encouraging civilian migration to Crimea and transferring regime officials, security forces and military personnel with their families – Ed.] and oppressing the pro-Ukrainian population which in the first instance consists of Crimean Tatars.

In the course of her 3,000-word interview, Bekeshkina made a number of other unrelated comments worth mentioning:

  • One must not exclude the possibility that Ukraine will have another revolution. It has had two already in the 21st century and neither were predicted. The attitudes of the masses are uncertain, and now that many people have arms, small groups may be in a position to play a larger, if unfortunate, political role.
  • Ukraine today has no political force or leader who has “more or less significant support from the population.” Most have only single digit backing or in the low teens.
  • “When people say that there was never as much corruption as now, this is not true.” What is true is that it has never been the subject of so much media attention.
  • Predicting the outcome of the next presidential election is a fool’s errand. People should remember that a year ahead of the last presidential elections, “sociologists did not even include in the list of candidates the man who is the current president.”
  • The Ukrainian government has committed “a great stupidity” in its handling of Mikheil Saakashvili. The regime didn’t need to expel him: he had no support and no legal right to run for president. But by acting as it has, Kyiv has entered into a situation where each of its steps makes the situation worse. At the same time, however, Saakashvili while a media sensation is no more likely to assemble a coalition now than he did earlier.
Edited by: A. N.
You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here

    Will the West continue to support Ukraine?
    • Know what moves the world.
    • Premium journalism from across Europe.
    • Tailored to your needs, translated into English.
    Special discount
    for Euromaidan Press readers
    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!

    Related Posts