Copyright © 2024

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Making Ukraine mono-ethnic – Putin’s greatest achievement and most fateful failure

Singing the national anthem of Ukraine at the Vyshyvanka March in Kyiv, May 2016 (Image:
Singing the national anthem of Ukraine at the Vyshyvanka March in Kyiv, May 2016 (Image:
Making Ukraine mono-ethnic – Putin’s greatest achievement and most fateful failure
Edited by: A. N.

Ninety-two percent of Ukrainian citizens now consider themselves ethnic Ukrainians, an unprecedented figure that is the product of Vladimir Putin’s aggression against their country and one that highlights the fundamental weakness of ethnic Russian national identities not only there but elsewhere — including in the Russian Federation.

According to a new poll by Kyiv’s Razumkov Center, 92 percent of Ukrainian citizens now consider themselves ethnic Ukrainians, six percent say they are ethnic Russians, and 1.5 percent identify as members of other ethnic groups.

Among young people in Ukraine, the share identifying as ethnic Ukrainians approaches 100 percent, the pollsters said, while among those over the age of 60, the figure was less than 90 percent but still far higher than at any point in the past.

The Razumkov Center also asked how many people feel themselves part of only one ethnic nation or instead as members of several. Among ethnic Ukrainians, it said, “77 percent feel themselves part of one nationality, 12 percent to two or more, six percent not as members of any nationality, and eight percent couldn’t or wouldn’t answer.”

But among those who identify as ethnic Russians in Ukraine, “only 39 percent” identify only with that ethnicity, an indication that many of them are less attached to the nationality of their birth and are in the process of shifting from one nation to another, in this case from the ethnic Russian nation to the Ukrainian ethnic one.

Not surprisingly, Moscow commentators are outraged by these figures and these implications, and one has called this poll a new form of “aggression by sociological poll” conducted by the United States against Russia on behalf of Ukraine.

And pro-Moscow Ukrainians, many of them now in Russia, see this poll as part of an effort to create a Ukrainian ethnic nation, something they argue resembles what the Soviets did and that does not exist independently of a broader “Russian world” reflecting history and language patterns.

One of their number, Bohdan Bezpalko, a Ukrainian who is a member of Putin’s Council on Inter-Ethnic Relations, however, in his argument against the new poll lets the cat out of the bag by acknowledging that “in fact, the very term ‘ethnic Ukrainian’ or ‘ethnic Russian is extremely ephemeral.”

That gets to the heart of the matter. Ethnic communities like all other human groups have histories, that is, they emerge, the flourish, and then they die. Often they do so because of the support they enjoy from states; and often those that do are thought to be eternal. But when conditions change – as when new states emerge – so too can new identities.

Ukrainian ethno-national identity is now strengthening not only in response to Kyiv’s policies but also to Moscow’s aggression against Ukraine; and it is doing so at the expense of Russian identity which was strong when Moscow dominated Ukraine but which is much less so now that Ukraine is independent.

And that means in turn that the real story here is not the strengthening of ethnic Ukrainian identity but the weakening of ethnic Russian ones, especially beyond the borders of the Russian Federation or even in the non-Russian portions of that country given that far more than Ukrainian identity, Russian identity is dependent on the state.

Indeed, it is difficult not to conclude that Kyiv commentator Oleg Polishchuk gets it right when he argues that Putin’s “conversion of Ukraine into a mono-ethnic state” represents an unusual form of “ethnocide in reverse,” a development with serious consequences not only for Ukraine but for Russia as well.


Edited by: A. N.
You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here

    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!

    Related Posts