Copyright © 2021 Euromaidanpress.com

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Former NATO Secretary General: I want to invite Ukraine to join NATO in Vilnius

rasmussen nato Ukraine membership vilnius
Former NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, Photo by Chan Chao
Former NATO Secretary General: I want to invite Ukraine to join NATO in Vilnius
Former NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen wants to extend an invitation for Ukraine to join NATO at the July summit in Vilnius. His statements come on the heels of his remarks one week ago about a group of NATO countries wanting to deploy troops to Ukraine if member states do not provide it with security guarantees; however, current NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has said that Ukraine could become a NATO member only after winning the war against Russia.

Over the last year, I have spent a lot of time reflecting on the question of Ukraine’s NATO membership. Yesterday, I outlined my views in a speech in Lithuania. Here is my conclusion:

Personally, I am in favor of extending an invitation to Ukraine to join NATO at the Vilnius NATO summit. I reflected carefully on this issue because it would be the first time we invite into NATO a country that is at war. That requires careful consideration.

I have reached this conclusion for three reasons.

  1. In 2008, we decided that Ukraine will become a member of NATO. But we did not provide a roadmap. Now Ukraine has been in the waiting room for 15 years. It is not a safe place. The waiting room is surrounded by a gang of thugs who attack those waiting. Time has come to move Ukraine into a safe place – as we are doing with Finland and Sweden.
  2. It is argued that the prospect of NATO enlargement incited Putin. The truth is the opposite. It was the failure to extend security guarantees to Ukraine that incited Putin. Grey zones are danger zones. Neutrality provides no security, as Finland and Sweden realized.
  3. I hear the argument that we cannot give Ukraine NATO membership while there is an ongoing war. That is an extremely dangerous argument. If you make security guarantees and NATO membership dependent on cessation of hostilities, you give Putin an incentive to continue the war indefinitely.

By extending an invitation now, we tell Putin: Ukraine will become a member of NATO. You cannot stop this process. Our door is open for Ukraine, and you are not the doorman.

If allies cannot find consensus in Vilnius, the second-best option is to outline the path toward NATO membership in two steps.

  1. First, remove a Membership Action Plan as a prerequisite for moving toward membership. We did this for Finland and Sweden. The same accelerated path should be offered to Ukraine.
  2. Next could be a pledge in Vilnius to review the question of NATO enlargement at the summit in Washington DC next year.

Let me stress: An invitation does not imply accession overnight. After the invitation, we will have to work out practicalities regarding article 5.

Which area will be covered? How will we react if and when there will be new clashes in occupied territories?

In the best case, those issues will be solved by the Ukrainians themselves, when they kick all Russian troops from Ukrainian soil. If not, we will have to find appropriate answers. They are important topics for allies that take article 5 seriously. We must find the right solution for commitments that could include the deployment of troops and military equipment to Ukraine.

Regardless, Ukraine needs security guarantees now. We need strong measures to deter further Russian aggression.

That is the purpose of the Kyiv Security Compact that I co-authored with Andrii Yermak. These guarantees will not replace Ukrainian membership of NATO, they can provide a bridge until it is covered by article 5.

A previous version of this article incorrectly referred to Anders Fogh Rasmussen as NATO Secretary General, He is actually the former NATO Secretary General and led NATO between 2009 and 2014.
You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here


    Related Posts