
Read also: One year later, what do we know about the MH17 tragedy?
So far there are no valid alternative theories, as Russia’s attempt to blame Ukrainian army got blown by Bellingcat. It is still not clear why Ukraine did not close its airspace over the Donbas in July 2017 completely. Tjibbe Joustra, the chairman of the Dutch Safety Board, underlined in 2015 there was sufficient reason to close the airspace as a precaution, but “the Ukrainian authorities failed to do so.” Ukraine’s foreign minister Pavlo Klimkin replied then that the Ukrainian authorities had been unaware that antiaircraft weapons were being used in the area. Moreover, Gennadiy Zubko, Ukraine’s deputy PM, stressed that Ukraine “had been gradually closing all sky corridors of an altitude of 9,750 metres and less.” However, that was not enough, as MH-17 was shot down at at a cruising altitude of 10,100 metres. Clearly, no one thought that civil plains were at risk. There were also judicial matters to solve. On 5 July 2017, Bert Koenders, Dutch foreign minister, emphasized that the JIT countries have now decided that the suspects should be prosecuted in the Netherlands, and this process “will be rooted in ongoing international cooperation and support.” This is important, given that the victims came from 17 different countries on five continents, Koenders says. The US welcomed this decision.Read also: Ukraine had no reason to close its airspace above 10 000 m before MH17 disaster
There is another problem. It is highly unlikely that Russia will recognize any decision of the trial. In 2015, it did its best to block the very creation of the tribunal. In this case, the trial will be held even with the physical absence of the suspects. Meanwhile, families of the MH-17 continue to demand justice. They have held a protest near the Russian Embassy in the Hague to mark the three-year anniversary of the catastrophe, Hromadske reports. According to news piece by NOS, a memorial park bench in front of the embassy building was installed. In Ukraine, MH-17 catastrophe is still a big deal. Many Ukrainian media mentioned the anniversary and gave updates on the state of the investigation. Ukrainian officials also remembered to honor the victims. For instance, President Poroshenko expressed his hope for the successful trial for those who planned and executed this terrorist act. Pavlo Klimkin, Ukraine’s foreign minister, noted that the investigation is already “halfway there.” “We want to know who pushed the button, who gave the order and what was the ultimate chain of command,” he claimed. So will the investigation be able to find those responsible for the downing of MH-17 plane? Is anyone in Russia’s government connected to this crime? We might receive the answers in early 2018, as Liow Tiong Lai, Malaysia’s transport minister, revealed.Prepared by Vitalii Rybak and Viktoriia Chernova for UkraineWorld group (ukraineworld.org)
Read also:
- Why did Russia close its airspace near Donbas one day before flight MH17 was downed?
- Ukraine had no reason to close its airspace above 10 000 m before MH17 disaster | Infographic
- Russian media forge more papers to blame Ukraine of downing MH17, make bad grammar mistakes
- Flight MH17 three years on: getting the truth out of Eastern Ukraine
- Novaya Gazeta identifies Russian colonel involved in shooting down MH17
- MH17: Crime without punishment
- Moscow may soon blame extraterrestrials for MH17 catastrophe, Russian aviation expert says
- Bellingcat narrows list of possible MH17 culprits from Russian 53rd Brigade to 20 servicemen
- The most comprehensive guide ever to MH17 conspiracies
- Placing MH17 disaster in context, ahead of Dutch report
- Russia’s MH17 narrative: a year of self-incrimination
- Putin’s MH17 nightmare: an international tribunal
- A guide to Russian propaganda: Rapid fire conspiracy theories