Flight MH17 three years on: getting the truth out of Eastern Ukraine

Piece of wreckage from flight MH17 at the site of the plane crash near the village of Hrabove in East Ukraine. Photo: Mauricio Lima

Piece of wreckage from flight MH17 at the site of the plane crash near the village of Hrabove in East Ukraine. Photo: Mauricio Lima 

Analysis & Opinion, Russia, War in the Donbas

Where were you on 17 July 2014? On this day a Malaysian Airlines flight, which had taken off from Amsterdam bound for Kuala Lumpur, was shot down over Eastern Ukraine, killing all 298 passengers and crew, among them 80 children. To many, this tragic event became a watershed: the conflict in Eastern Ukraine ceased to be a regional problem and moved much closer to the life of a larger, global international community.

Very detailed evidence

Now, almost three years after, very detailed evidence has been gathered about the event. The governments of the states who lost most citizens in the catastrophe have set up a Joint Investigation Team (JIT), which has concluded that the plane was shot down by a BUK missile located in an area controlled by the Russia-supported rebels. Independent open source journalistic investigation has traced the missile launcher and the people who operated it from Russia into Ukraine and back again into Russia, and the Joint Investigation Team has agreed with these conclusions. With the anniversary approaching later this month, the states which are members of the Joint Investigation Team have collectively decided that the prosecution of suspects in the downing of flight MH17 can take place in the Netherlands.

Read also: MH17: Crime without punishment

Relatives of MH17 victims installed a bench with this memorial plaque near the Russian embassy in Hague on the eve of the tragedy’s third anniversary. Photo: Jildou van Opzeeland

Relatives of MH17 victims installed a bench with this memorial plaque near the Russian embassy in Hague on the eve of the tragedy’s third anniversary. Photo: Jildou van Opzeeland

Pro-Kremlin media aim at creating confusion

But in the world of pro-Kremlin media, things are different. Since the day of the attack, these outlets have, perhaps more eagerly and systematically than in regards to any other issue, fabricated and disseminated a series of alternative stories with the clear aim of muddying the waters and creating the false impression that there is no clarity. The pro-Kremlin disinformation campaign in regards to the downing of flight MH17 is a textbook example of the important point that these kinds of campaigns rarely aim at, making us believe in one particular truth. No, the aim has been and remains to confuse us, to promote the false belief that no clarity has been achieved and that we will probably never learn what really happened.

Read also: Russia’s MH17 narrative: a year of self-incrimination

The long list of pro-Kremlin disinformation about MH17

The latest example of pro-Kremlin disinformation about MH17 came last week, as reported in the latest issue of the Disinformation Review, when different pro-Kremlin media, among them Lenta.ru, claimed that newly emerged documentation and testimonies prove that MH17 was downed in a carefully planned operation by Ukraine’s armed forces. It is telling that Lenta.ru’s story refers to the findings of the Joint Investigation Team as a versiya,” i.e. a “version” —meaning just one explanation of many. This formulation is at the core of the narrative of the confusion campaign in pro-Kremlin media.

As the Disinformation Review has earlier reported, most recently in January, the list of “versions”, or alleged “theories”, in pro-Kremlin media is long—the story brought forward by Lenta.ru can be added to this list:

1. Ukrainian fighter jets were operating in the area around the crash, supposedly confirmed by a Spanish air traffic controller working in Ukraine named Carlos (Rossiya/Vesti: http://bit.ly/2evv8Xa);

2. The aim of the Ukrainian Air Force had been to shoot down President Putin’s plane (Lifenews: http://bit.ly/2eRF7nR);

3. For some “unknown reasons,” Ukraine had ordered the plane to descend just before the catastrophe (also Lifenews);

4. Local eyewitnesses said that some of the dead bodies had looked “unfresh,” and suggested that the plane had been loaded with dead bodies when it took off from Amsterdam (Russkaya Vesna: http://bit.ly/1n0rQbC);

5. MH17 was, in fact, flight MH370, which disappeared in March 2014 in Asia, a claim based on the untrue suggestion that no relatives of those killed on board MH17 had been identified (News2: http://bit.ly/2eGpWNO).

Cartoon by Jeff Darcy, 22 July 2014

Cartoon by Jeff Darcy, 22 July 2014

The Russian government has also attempted to explain what happened, in different versions:

6. In July 2014, the Russian Ministry of Defence presented radar imagery to allege there was a Ukrainian jet close to MH17, and that Ukraine had moved BUK missiles closer to “rebel” territory;

7. Two years later, the Russian Ministry of Defence presented a different and contradictory set of radar imagery.

Read also: Russian media forge more papers to blame Ukraine of downing MH17, make bad grammar mistakes

In addition, photoshopped images were used to support the Kremlin’s narrative on MH17. See, for example, the below images, the first an original Reuters photo, the second a faked version shared on Facebook http://bit.ly/2hj9GDe; and a report on this pro-Kremlin fake here: http://f24.my/2i5LN2a.

(It is worth noting that most of the stories above are not based on any kind of evidence, e.g. “Carlos” in Example 1 never existed, and, in any case, there are no Spanish air controllers in the area).

Journalists seek the truth in Eastern Ukraine

As common sense has it, the first casualty of war is truth. We have certainly come to expect lies to be a part of the picture, perhaps even shameless lying about who killed innocent civilians on board a plane above the battle field, as well as lies about the EU funding concentration camps and about crucified children. More than ever, it becomes clear that, easy as it is to make up and spread disinformation, so is it demanding to get the truth out of the war zone in Eastern Ukraine. Without the work of investigative journalist communities and reporters on the ground, disinformation risks succeeding in its efforts to make us believe that we will never learn the truth.

Read also: Novaya Gazeta identifies Russian colonel involved in shooting down MH17

This article was originally published on euvsdisinfo.eu.


Since you’re here – we have a favor to ask. Russia’s hybrid war against Ukraine is ongoing, but major news agencies have gone away. But we’re here to stay, and will keep on providing quality, independent, open-access information on Ukrainian reforms, Russia’s hybrid war, human rights violations, political prisoners, Ukrainian history, and more. We are a non-profit, don’t have any political sponsors, and never will. If you like what you see, please help keep us online with a donation!

Tags: , , , ,

  • Victor Victory

    Nuke the Russia

    • Rafael Hernandez

      Somehow trying to destroy Russia, always ends in destruction for the attacker.

      • Brent

        Just like Russia vowing to “destroy the West”, “nuke Denmark”, and end American influence on the World is bringing about the downfall of your beloved Russia “Ralphie”….for once you may be on to something “walnut brain”…

        • focusser1

          What he doesn’t realise, the West don’t need to do anything to bring Russia down. Putin is doing a great job all by himself. I hope he runs for election next year. Another 5 years of Putin should finish the job.

        • Rafael Hernandez

          Hey, hemeroid, the Russians control the white house.

      • focusser1

        Name one war that Russia won by itself.

        • Rafael Hernandez

          French invasion of Russia 1812

          • focusser1

            Wrong. About 7% of the officer corps came from the Baltic German nobility from the governorates of Estonia and Livonia.

          • Rafael Hernandez

            Yeah, but Russia crushed the strongest army in the world

          • focusser1

            So your country didn’t win this war by itself. They needed foreign officers.

          • Rafael Hernandez

            Considering that my country is Norway, I hardly think so, lol :). If you are talking about Russia, Napoleon’s army had lost 70% of their original army when they reached Moscow. The return back, does not need an explanation. Of the 600000 soldiers that invaded Russia 11000 returned home

          • focusser1

            Of course it is. Find out how Russians that Russia killed by burning all the crops and destroying villages, as they retreated from Napoleon.

          • Ihor Dawydiak

            Considering the issue that you Raffi, are a trotsky-troll who escaped his native Venezuela to take refuge in the USA, are you and your Russian wife not concerned that Trump might soon deport you back to your real homeland where you will not be fit to survive? If not, you should be worried, very worried.

  • Dirk Smith
    • veth

      Terrorist 1 till 10…………….

    • veth


  • veth

    Netherlands to punish aggressor for MH17 tragedy – Poroshenko

    Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko has honored the memory of the victims of the MH17 flight, shot down on July 17, 2014; saying Ukraine and the Netherlands have signed an agreement on a mechanism to bring those who committed the crime to justice, according to the president’s Facebook page.

    Politics 16:59, 17 July 2017 Photo from UNIAN “Today, lighting candles in remembrance, we’re bowing our heads to the 298 innocent victims of the MH17 flight. A terrible tragedy and unspeakable pain, which touched the hearts of their relatives and friends, each of us, on that day, as now. It was a barefaced crime that could have been avoided if not for Russian aggression, the Russian system and a Russian missile that came from Russian territory,” Poroshenko wrote on Facebook. Poroshenko stressed that “our responsibility before the dead and before next generations is to show the aggressor’s terrorists that responsibility is unavoidable for all the crimes committed.” According to Poroshenko, that is why he decided to transfer the investigation to the Netherlands on the first days after the tragedy. “Without hesitation and according to my powers, I signed an agreement between Ukraine and the Netherlands a few days ago that confirmed the selection of a mechanism for bringing to justice those responsible for this crime,” the president said. Read also UK welcomes use of Dutch national prosecution for MH17 suspects Poroshenko stressed that this is “our common response to the geopolitical ambitions of those who are trying to derail the establishment of the truth at the highest international level.” “I am convinced that the objective and impartial Dutch justice will complete this path. It is our shared duty in the face of the memory of those whose beating hearts were stopped exactly three years ago by a Russian missile,” he wrote.

    Read more on UNIAN: https://www.unian.info/politics/2033316-netherlands-to-punish-aggressor-for-mh17-tragedy-poroshenko.html

  • veth
  • veth

    Renowned psychiatrist on Putin’s fears
    Ukrainian psychiatrist, dissident and former human rights activist Semen Gluzman told about the fears of Vladimir Putin in an interview to The Apostrof July 17:

    “Russia’s present leader is well aware that he is a looser in politics.

    Putin has lost, and he knows this as he is not a stupid man. Yes, he grabbed Crimea for good, he believes. However, he bit more than he can chew with Donbas. He failed.

    By nature he is not the man who can back up. He fears his own people – that is why his new national guard is so big. Читайте більше тут: http://zik.ua/en/news/2017/07/17/renowned_psychiatrist_on_putins_fears_1133237

  • Screwdriver

    Too bad that Kiev regime was using airstrikes on Donbass people. It could all be avoidable.
    Kiev nazi regime is soaked in blood of so many innocent victims.