Copyright © 2024 Euromaidanpress.com

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Journalists demand dialogue with the government on Georgy Gongadze’s commemoration day

Journalists demand dialogue with the government on Georgy Gongadze’s commemoration day
Article by: Iryna Stelmakh
Translated by: Mariya Shcherbinina

On September 16, journalists in Kyiv and regions traditionally commemorated Georgy Gongadze and other journalists who died doing their professional duties for the fourteenth year in a row. However, media workers claim nothing has changed since Gongadze’s death, and call 2014 the most tragic year for Ukrainian journalism – during the ATO, 7 journalists have been killed and over 70 have been held hostage. In times of extreme hardship for the media, the government should offer a hand and engage with profiling laws, media experts ask. 

On Tuesday, starting the very morning, a banner with the inscription, Georgy, we have not forgotten emerged on the bridge between October Palace and Maidan Nezalezhnosti. In the evening, journalists came to the stella in Maidan to traditionally commemorate the fallen journalists with a mourning march and a candlelight vigil. This year the list includes seven more journalists.

“Throughout the eight months of 2014, 265 journalists were beaten. As of now, over 70 journalists have been held hostage on occupied territories, in both Crimea and in the East of Ukraine, and 7 journalists were killed. We documented also 120 instances of censure, 90% of which had to do with switching off Ukrainian TV channels or blocking the issue of Ukrainian media,” says executive director of the Mass Information Institute Oksana Romaniuk.

The reasons for the lack of protection for journalists in Ukraine is the lack of a systematic dialogue with the government. International journalist for Hromadske.TV Natalia Humeniuk, who is a frequent guest in the combat zone in the east, notes that the blame for this lies on state bodies, especially military ones, which frequently provide unverified information.

“It is not normal when our colleagues, who went to report on the events in the east, have to refute data produced by state government. I can say that significant exaggeration or lack of information verification on part of the Defense Ministry representatives and other official structure also significantly undermines their authority in the eyes of foreign journalists, who cannot trust those they should,” says Humeniuk.

As such, the investigation of Georgy Gongadze’s murder, just like the investigation of all crimes against journalists, is the government’s foremost task, if it wants to encourage the development of freedom of speech in Ukraine, say the media workers. This is why the journalists from Stop Censure! made a special address to the President, the Head of the MIA and the Prosecutor General.

“In Ukraine there are no platforms, within which we could meet and publicly raise these issues. We have not yet heard the position of the newly-elected President regarding freedom of speech, the investigation of attacks on journalists and social television. Therefore, I would like to address Petro Poroshenko, Prosecutor General Vitaly Yarema, Internal Minister Arsen Avakov, and ask them to begin systematic dialogue with the journalist community, begin active work not only on the investigations, but media reforms, which would protect the rights of Ukrainian citizens to information,” calls Oksana Romaniuk.

The media reforms journalists demand have to do with the creation of social broadcasting, the privatization of printed media, transparent media property and the liquidation of the National Committee for Social Morality. The media community relies on the journalists that decided to run in the parliamentary elections for their demands to be met.

Translated by: Mariya Shcherbinina
You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here



    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!

    Related Posts

    February 12: ”Normandy Four” negotiations concluded in Minsk with a disappointing result for Ukraine

    February 12 – "Normandy Four" negotiations concluded in Minsk with a disappointing result for Ukraine. Putin did not give in on a single point – there will be no withdrawal of Russian troops (they are, of course, nowhere close to Ukraine), no immediate resumption of control over the border, no reinstatement of sovereignty over occupied Crimea or Donbas. There are, however, the obligations on behalf of Ukraine to service social needs of separatists, legalize their armed gangs and hold fake elections under their watchful eye. The situation looks a lot like the surrender of Sudetenland (Czechoslovakia) to Hitler.

    February 12 – Total financial assistance to Ukraine from the IMF and other organizations could amount to 40 billion dollars over 4 years, – said IMF's Managing Director Christine Lagarde.

    February 12 – Russian Ministry for Emergency Situations has announced the preparations for the 14th so-called humanitarian aid convoy destined for Donbas – more weapons will be transported, no doubt.

    February 12 – Russia has transferred another lot of military equipment and artillery to the territory of Ukraine, controlled by militants – approximately 50 tanks, 40 "Grad", "Uragan" and "Smerch" multiple rocket launch systems and 40 armored vehicles crossed Russian-Ukrainian border at border crossing point Izvaryne, – said NSDC spokesman Andriy Lysenko.

    February 12 – The transfer of the amphibious assault ship "Vladivostok" (Mistral-class) to Russia could begin as early as next week.

    February 12 – EU High Representative for Common Foreign and Security Policy Federica Mogherini does not expect sanctions against Russia to be discussed during the summit of EU member-states leaders to be held on Thursday.

    February 12 – Secretary General of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Lamberto Zannier hassaid that at present it is impossible to determine whether the militants in Donbas are also soldiers of the regular Russian army. OSCE has completely exhausted itself as a security-oriented organization.

    February 12 – Agreements reached in Minsk during the meeting of the leaders of the countries of the "Normandy quartet" are absolutely weak. This was stated by the President of Lithuania, Dalia Grybaskaite, to journalists in Brussels before the EU Summit. "The fundamental part of the resolution is the control of the borders. It was not agreed upon and not resolved," she noted. "This means that the border is open for crossing by whatever soldiers and whatever artillery," remarked Grybaskaite. "This means that the resolution is totally weak," emphasized the President of Lithuania. She is also not very optimistic about the agreements on the cease-fire.

    "Five months ago we already had one agreement about a cease-fire which was not implemented. Let's see what happens with this one," underlined Grybaskaite. "We will observe in the next few days how at least these partial agreements will be implemented," she added.

    War is hell! (photo report from occupied Vuhlehirsk)

    Russia lies... great start to Minsk agreement (Savchenko cannot be released!!)

    Timothy Ash

    Ukraine – deal thoughts


    I guess with hindsight, a deal was always going to be done. Merkel was not going to get on a flight to Minsk, after Kyiv, Moscow, and Berlin, and not get something. And Putin needed to try and rebuild some bridges with Merkel, after seemingly upsetting her at Brisbane. Merkel is probably the honest broker in all this. She really feels for the Ukrainian position, but understands the real threat from Russia – she reads Putin better than any other Western leader, and cannot be bought. But it is Bismark-style real politik for Merkel, and she was desperate to stop the fighting – almost at any cost, which is entirely understandable. Hollande will likely get his aircraft carriers delivered, and sees all this as offering the hope of ressurection in terms of his presidency at home – a global leader, strutting the international stage and making Cameron, et al look like poodles, or rather a bulldog with no teeth. Putin gets his aircraft carriers, which will no doubt have a nice shiny berth now awaiting in Sebastopol. Putin also fended off near term threats of sanctions from the West, and can sell himself to allies in Europe (there are many) as a peacemaker – again heading off further sanctions threats. He has also not agreed to very much, as I don't think his signature is on the document, so if it fails (and it likely will) he can blame others. He has also headed off the threat of the US arming Ukraine – and therein he is in cahoots with Obama himself, who will see this deal as being useful in fending off calls from the DC consensus (including within his own administration) now to arm Ukraine – and can return to his own "splendid isolation" or "strategic patience" as it is now called stateside. That's a nice term for doing as little as possible. Poroshenko gets his IMF programme, and can try and roll out reforms attached to this to try and assure the supporters of Maydan that this team is really the Real Deal in terms of the reforms they so desire. Note the IMF press release was timed for 10am, just as news of the Minsk deal broke – so my sense is that someone was telling the Ukrainians that an IMF deal was contingent on a Minsk ceasefire deal. No ceasefire – no IMF deal. And the IMF gets to roll out its new programme, which it has been working on for months. Poroshenko probably also thinks that the ceasefire will buy time for Ukraine to regroup, rearm against the clear and present danger of further Russian intervention. But will it all stick/last? I just do not think so, as I still fail to see from this deal what is different to Minsk I in terms of delivery on Russian strategic objectives in Ukraine. Minsk I clearly did not deliver for Russia, hence that ceasefire did not last long, so let's see what is really different this time around. The issues of real autonomy/federalism, and border control don't appear to be properly addressed in this document. Constitutional reform towards the Russian agenda will be impossible for Poroshenko to deliver. And finally and fundamentally why I do not think that the status quo is sustainable – one year ago Russia felt the need to annex Crimea, and intervene in eastern Ukraine. But one year ago Ukraine was no threat to Russia as a) it was non aligned; b) popular support for Nato membership was low single digits, and there was little support in parliament or amongst political elites to drive Ukraine NATO membership. C) the west really did not want Ukraine in NATO as they saw this as a red rag to the Russian bull, and as events have proved could not defend Ukraine under NATO's TOR; c) the Ukrainian military had limited fighting capability as was proven in the early days of the conflict, but subsequently changed; d) the govt in Kyiv was weak and disarray and the Ukrainian economy on the brink of collapse; e) and as events have proven Russia had de facto control of Crimea via the stationing of 26,000 troops and the long term BSF agreement. And f) and finally Ukrainians were not anti-russian or even particularly anti-Putin. If Moscow was not a real threat a year ago, but Moscow felt compelled to intervene, look at the risk from a Russian perspective now from Ukraine – a) Ukraine is no longer non aligned. B) it now wants to join NATO and opinion polls now show majority support for this. C) Ukraine is rebuilding military capability and the military doctrine is now against the threat from Russia; d) Ukraine has a reform admin in Kyiv, which has a real chance of succeeding now with imf support. It can offer a rival and successful model of development to Putin's power vertical and sovereign democracy. E) Opinion polls show strong ukrainian opposition/distaste for the Putin regime. So, net-net the above still suggests the risk of further future Russian intervention in Ukraine.

    P.S.: Please spread this appeal as much as possible.

    February 5: Parliament of Ukraine has stripped the fourth President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych of his presidential title

    February 4 – 4 Ukrainian military were killed and 25 injured in the ATO are in the last 24 hours, – informed the spokesman of NSDC Information Center Andriy Lysenko.

    February 4 – Facilitated by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the government of Ukraine is preparing a bill to limit "sovereign immunity", which will enable Ukrainian citizens and businesses to sue Russia as a state. Thus MFA of Ukraine is preparing grounds to seize assets as a result of Crimea's annexation.

    February 4 – Parliament of Ukraine has stripped the fourth President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych of his presidential title. The initiators of the law, point out that Yanukovych "has encroached power, which led to undermined foundations of national security and defense of Ukraine, as well as wrongful violation of human rights". Law enforcement authorities are currently searching for Yanukovych.

    February 4 – Ukrainian Parliament has recognized the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (the Hague Tribunal) regarding the situation that has developed as a result of Russia's military aggression against Ukraine since February 27th 2014 and international crimes that have been committed in Ukraine.

    February 4 – Officers of the Security Service of Ukraine (SSU) have detained Lieutenant Colonel of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine who is one of the organizers of a fake attack on the Presidential Administration on February 3rd, – stated SSU Chief Valentyn Nalyvaichenko.

    February 4 – Armed Forces of Ukraine have killed 11 Russian military who participated in the shelling of Mariupol on January 24th (Russian officer-terrorist who led the artillery attack and 10 his accomplices). All of them were killed near the village of Bezimenne (Novoazovsk rayon). Russian troops continue to hide the traces of these crimes. Russian soldiers have been transporting the bodies of the terrorists to Russia so that the relatives are able to bury them, – informed SSU Chief Valentyn Nalyvaichenko at a press conference. According to him, SSU has identified everyone who shelled Mariupol but "operation continues to identify terrorists who attacked civilians in Volnovakha and other areas".

    February 4 – in the Donbas region the general number of fighters already exceeds 3 thousand people and they are continuing to increse their strength. This is written by the organizer of the group "Informational Opposition" and deputy Dmytro Tymchuk. "Within a 24-hour period we have noted the arrival of live forces on 24 covered trucks as well as 11 units of impenetrable carriers (including one tank)," writes Tymchuk.

    February 4 – On Wednesday around 12 noon a hospital was shelled; casualties include wounded and killed.

    February 4 – Counter reconnaissance of SBUhave apprehended near Horlivka a 44-year old corrector of artillery fire. "Her building was located at a height from which from her 7th floor there can be seen the armed technical force of ATO within a radius of 5 kilometers," informed a conversationalist. According to him, the woman corrected the fire and traced the track of the firings by the fighters at goals in Debaltsev, Myronivsk, Mayorsk, Vuhlehirsk. "She even had a looking glass and a photo camera. She went to different points and took photographs of what the ammunition hit," he added. "The woman said that she passed on these photographs to the fighters through her daughter who still attends school," he continued. He added that two sons of the woman are fighting on the side of the fighters of "DNR".

    Ukraine is bleeding

    Wolfgang Ischinger

    Pledge weapons for Ukraine or the violence will go on

    Taras Kuzio

    Arm Ukraine and force Putin back to the negotiating table

    Ukraine crisis: Leaders in new diplomatic push for peace

    Illegal land grab and expropriation in occupied Crimea

    More about occupied Crimea

    Putin is dangerous psychopath

    Roger Boyes

    Arming Ukraine will stop Putin in his tracks

    P.S.: Please spread this appeal as much as possible.