"It can quickly resume providing military aid to let Ukraine stabilize the front lines near the current locations. Or it can let the Russians defeat the Ukrainian military and drive toward the NATO borders from the Black Sea to central Poland."He emphasizes that there is no third option and that the long-term risks and costs of allowing Russia to defeat Ukraine far outweigh the short-term price of resuming assistance. The report also underscores the potential consequences of a Russian victory in Ukraine for NATO's defense. It argues that a successful Ukrainian military, even if it just holds the current frontlines, would make a future Russian attack on Poland or the Baltic States much harder and riskier. Conversely, if Russia defeats Ukraine, "NATO will face tremendous challenges in defending its northeastern members," and "the Russians will also impress hundreds of thousands or even millions of Ukrainians into military service, along with the defense industrial base Ukrainians are now constructing, significantly increasing Russia's military and economic potential." The ISW presents two maps to illustrate the advantages Russia would secure by defeating Ukraine and those that NATO would receive from helping Ukraine hold the line or push the Russians further east and south. The report concludes that "American interests now and in the future are served far better by resuming aid to Ukraine now than by allowing Russia to win."

