Copyright © 2024

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Putin’s “annexation” of Donbas showed Crimea was no special case and his loss of Kherson shows Ukraine can retake it, Portnikov says

simferopol russia occupied crimea putin russian propaganda billboards
On the streets of Simferopol, the capital of the Russian-occupied Autonomous Republic of Crimea, billboards with various Putin quotes. This one reads: “Our task is the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine.” #wedon’tleaveours/ Source: Flickr, SebastianBerlin
Putin’s “annexation” of Donbas showed Crimea was no special case and his loss of Kherson shows Ukraine can retake it, Portnikov says
Edited by: Kate Ryabchiy
Both were no more than imperial langrabs. Kherson demonstrates that militarism can and must be defeated, even in Ukraine’s Crimea, says the Ukrainian columnist.

Putin justified his 2014 Anschluss of Ukraine’s Crimea by claiming that Crimea had long been a “sacred” part of the Russian world. Furthermore, he was simply reversing Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev’s criminal decision to give this “Russian” region to Ukraine.

Many Russians and far too many Westerners accepted and continue to get this notion, arguing that regardless of the fate of other parts of Ukraine, Kyiv must not challenge Moscow on Crimea. However, two recent developments have shattered such claims and arguments, Vitaly Portnikov says.

On the one hand, when Putin declared that he was annexing parts of the Donbas, the Kremlin leader made no distinction between what he was doing there and what he did in Crimea. It demonstrated that both were nothing more than imperial land grabs, according to the Ukrainian columnist.

On the other hand, when Ukrainian forces pushed back the Russian invaders and retook Kherson, they proved they could defeat Russian troops on Ukrainian territory. They also compelled Russian occupation officials in Crimea to take steps to defend their earlier conquest. This highlighted yet another similarity between Crimea and the Donbas.

According to Portnikov, “it has become evident that the ‘sacredness’ [of Crimea, as Putin likes to assert and many in the West accept] was only a pathetic excuse” because the Kremlin leader planned and attempted to annex more of Ukraine.

However, his defeat at Kherson shows that this is not irreversible, regardless of what he or others believe.

Russian occupation does not provide people with security and is not permanent, the Ukrainian columnist continues.

Instead, Putin’s occupation of Crimea “brought war and fear to the peninsula and was the first step in a war against all of Ukraine. It wasn’t ‘sacred’ at all, and Putin made no effort to secure it.” Alternatively, Crimea was “merely the first victim of resurgent Russian militarism.”

Nevertheless, Kherson demonstrates that militarism can and must be defeated, even in Ukraine’s Crimea.

Edited by: Kate Ryabchiy
You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here

    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!

    Related Posts