The Kremlin almost certainly decided to move against Memorial now lest that human rights group serve as a rallying cry and thus crystalize growing opposition among the Russian people against an expanded war against Ukraine, Moscow commentator Igor Chubais says.
Of course, given censorship and the lack of reliable information about what is taking place inside the corridors of power, he continues, it is impossible to sort out all the rumors now circulating about this decision; but the relationship between Memorial’s closing and Moscow’s moves in Ukraine is too obvious to miss.
Before giving “the final order” on Ukraine, the Russian leadership “cannot but consider public opinion and the position of the partially destroyed civil society inside its own country.”
Memorial is “the most serious and well-known civic organization with well-deserved authority inside the Russian Federation and abroad.”
That is especially the case, the Moscow writer says, because it is becoming “ever more obvious that our society is against the intensification of Russian military activity in Ukraine.” Shuttering Memorial will thus eliminate one important channel for those attitudes to come together and influence the West if not the Kremlin itself.
- “An attempt to ban memory.” Why Russia wants to shut down its top human rights NGO Memorial
- Russia’s moves toward fascism come ‘not just from Putin,’ Russian human rights campaigner says
- ‘Authoritarian international’ emerging to fight democracy and human rights, Shaburov says
- President of Memorial: Russian rights activists who backed Russia’s return to PACE repeated error of liberals in 1993
- The system of torture and rape in Russian prisons was imposed by Moscow, GULAGU.Net activist says
- Moscow moves from justifying GULAG to glorifying it
- Putin restores the GULAG by legalizing slave labor of convicts