Copyright © 2024 Euromaidanpress.com

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

See which countries side with Russia during the UNGA votes on Crimea

Crimean vote UNGA
The evolution of the vote on occupied Crimea at the UNGA. Snapshot from the report by ZMINA
See which countries side with Russia during the UNGA votes on Crimea
Article by: Tetyana Pechonchyk
Seven years ago, on 27 March 2014, 100 UN members condemned Russia’s occupation of Crimea by adopting a relevant resolution at the General Assembly. However, the support for Ukraine’s territorial integrity has been less pronounced in the following years. The human rights organization ZMINA analyzed which countries allied themselves with Russia, and who merely abstained, as well as what this means for Ukraine’s efforts to de-occupy Crimea.

Since 2014, the UN General Assembly has adopted resolutions on violations of human rights and international norms in Crimea committed by the Russian Federation. Over 7 years, the UN General Assembly has adopted 9 resolutions — on the territorial integrity of Ukraine (2014), on the human rights situation in Crimea (2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020), and on the militarization of the Crimean peninsula (2018, 2019, 2020)

Apart from the first resolution on the territorial integrity of Ukraine, which was more unequivocally supported and voted for by 100 countries, support for the human rights resolutions and militarization resolutions is slightly lower and the number of countries supporting these resolutions changes every year. The number of countries voting in favor ranges from 60-80, 20-30 countries vote against, and another 70-80 countries abstain.

Nonetheless, for voting to be valid and for the adoption of a resolution by the UN General Assembly, the ratio of votes for and against is what matters. So even if there are more countries that abstained than those that voted in favor, the resolution is still adopted.

Russia and its satellites always vote against – Venezuela, Syria, Cuba, Belarus, Armenia, etc. As well, countries with the greatest human rights problems, such as China or North Korea, become situational allies of Russia: they generally oppose resolutions focused on specific countries/territories.

However, the number of countries supporting the Crimean resolutions is an important indicator, because if more and more countries move from support to passive “abstention,” it indicates a certain “fatigue” from the Crimean issue, unwillingness to support Ukraine, which is in a state of war for seven years and opposes the occupation.

That is why the work of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and civil society is so important, so that focus is not lost on Crimean issues at the UN. We hope that the launch of the Crimean Platform, which Ukraine initiated in 2020, will be a new impetus for the consolidation and coordination of international efforts aimed at the de-occupation of Crimea and the protection of human rights there.

For many years, human rights organizations have called for the creation of an international platform for Crimea, and we hope that the efforts will be effective, help in the struggle for the release of political prisoners, and bring the day of Crimea’s return to Ukrainian control closer.

A PDF version of this report is available here.

Tetiana Pechonchyk is the head of the board at Human Rights Center ZMINA. Today, ZMINA focuses on monitoring the freedom of speech, the situation of journalists and human rights defenders in Crimea and supports local grass-root initiatives. ZMINA, together with three Crimean organizations, is a member of the Human Rights House Crimea (in exile). In September 2018 ZMINA organized an international human rights mission to Crimea with the involvement of Human Rights Houses from Azerbaijan, Belarus, and Ukraine. 

 

Read also:

You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here


    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!

    Related Posts