Copyright © 2024 Euromaidanpress.com

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

‘Russia’s dependency on China growing with each passing day,’ Felgenhauer says

At the recent Abu Dhabi arms show, Russian officials claimed that the long-awaited very-long-range missiles 40N6E for Russia's most advanced S-400 Triumf (NATO reporting name: SA-21 Growler) anti-aircraft weapon system that were purchased by China were damaged at sea during shipment and had to be destroyed. (Photo: Video screen capture of testing an S-400 at the Kapustin Yar Proving Grounds in Russia.)
At the recent Abu Dhabi arms show, Russian officials claimed that the long-awaited very-long-range missiles 40N6E for Russia’s most advanced S-400 Triumf (NATO reporting name: SA-21 Growler) anti-aircraft weapon system that were purchased by China were damaged at sea during shipment and had to be destroyed. (Photo: Video screen capture of testing an S-400 at the Kapustin Yar Proving Grounds in Russia.)
‘Russia’s dependency on China growing with each passing day,’ Felgenhauer says
Edited by: A. N.

Three days ago, Pavel Felgenhauer published in Moscow’s Novaya gazeta an article headlined “The Dependence of Russia on China is Growing with Each Passing Day.” It has now been taken down, something that only highlights its importance and does nothing to keep people from reading it.

That is because in the age of the Internet, suppressing articles is typically a fool’s errand, given that most are reposted elsewhere as in this case (charter97.org and censoru.net) and that suppression only encourages people to read what they might otherwise have ignored.

Felgenhauer is one of Moscow’s most respected independent military analysts, and this article is important not only for what it says about Russia’s increasing dependence on China for military technology, a reverse of what was true only a few decades ago, but also about the shifting geopolitical balance toward China at Russia’s expense.

The military analyst devotes most of his article to the way in which Russian officials blamed their inability to deliver on a military contract by saying that the equipment had been lost at sea. But this is obviously a cover for something more serious – the inability of Russia to meet its obligations and deliver the most advanced systems.

Claiming that equipment has been lost at sea, Felgenhauer points out, was “a classic Soviet means” of dispensing with outdated products and escaping responsibility for meeting its contractual obligations. What is worrisome is that nearly three decades after the end of the USSR, Moscow continues to use the same means.

“President Vladimir Putin,” the military analyst says, “publicly maintains the equal nature of Russian-Chinese interaction, but in reality, one can only dream about this today.”
China has been living under sanctions concerning dual use goods since the Tiananmen Square bloodbath. That forced Beijing to move quickly toward import substitution.

According to Felgenhauer, “in the 1990s, a comparatively poor and backward China had to buy in Russia what it couldn’t get in the West,” although Moscow was not willing to sell everything Beijing wanted. Nonetheless, “much then came from Russia into China.” But today, Russia, because of the sanctions imposed on it, can’t provide as many high-tech items.

In case after case, Russia can’t produce the military goods it would like to because many of the components it needs it can no longer obtain because of Western sanctions over its military aggression in Ukraine.
Unlike China, which has been largely successful in import substitution, Russia has not made much progress, Felgenhauer says.

And that has had another consequence that reflects the changing balance between Russia and China: Russia is now buying military equipment from China that it cannot now produce on the basis of its own resources. “China still needs Russia,” Felgenhauer concludes, but talk about equality in their relations is “ever less” true, as the balance shifts away from Moscow.

Read More:

Edited by: A. N.
You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here



    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!

    Related Posts