Vladimir Putin views autocephaly for the Ukrainian Orthodox as having an equally fateful and negative impact on Russia as the disintegration of the Soviet Union, Andrey Illarionov says. The Kremlin leader will never forgive Kyiv for this and will do all he can to block it.
During a conversation with Ukraine’s Glavred news agency, the former Putin advisor and current senior fellow at Washington’s Cato Institute says that the Kremlin is truly alarmed about Ukrainian autocephaly.
Since 2014, he argues, Ukraine has done nothing as important as its pursuit of autocephaly except for military resistance. Gaining that independent status for the church shores up the country’s political independence and weakens “the imperial position” of the Moscow church, pointing to its eventual exit from Ukraine and ultimately from Belarus as well.
According to Illarionov,
That is because the Kremlin leader knows that if he loses on this, he loses far more than he can and still have his current agenda survive.
After both those events, “the political disintegration of the empire began in the religious sphere. Putin understands this very well and therefore doesn’t intend to surrender his positions.”
If the Kremlin leader can’t stop autocephaly – and it certainly appears that that train has left the station, Illarionov says – he will certainly seek “’to punish’ Ukraine for its acquisition” out of his own self-regard and because such punishment will serve as a warning to others not to try anything similar.
What Putin will try will depend, however, not only on the mechanisms at his command but also on the reaction of Ukraine, other post-Soviet states and the West, where unfortunately many do yet not understand that Moscow’s loss of an imperial church just like its earlier loss of an imperial communist party prefigures much broader losses in other sectors as well.
Consequently, Putin’s response almost certainly will be far more negative than most in the West now imagine, including the possibility of a major military move. In the mind of the Kremlin ruler, that – despite all the negative consequences it would entail – may pose fewer negatives than doing nothing and watching his imperial dreams dissolve.
Further Reading:
- Moscow Patriarchate’s Church in Ukraine will survive autocephaly, but as marginal force, Yurash says
- Moscow laying groundwork for alternative patriarchate in Muslim Türkiye
- Putin’s ‘Russian world’ rapidly contracting in Ukraine and elsewhere, Sokolov says
- More fallout from Ukrainian autocephaly: Russians learn Moscow Orthodox hierarchs were KGB officers
- Constantinople: Moscow could be stripped of autocephaly, while Belarus could gain it
- Ukrainian mufti puts a Russian one in his place over Orthodox autocephaly
- Tomos ante portas: a short guide to Ukrainian church independence
- Constantinople decision on Ukrainian Church truly has global consequences
- The next domino – Belarusian Orthodox hope for autocephaly
- Moscow having failed to block Ukrainian autocephaly now attempting to exploit it
- Constantinople could grant autocephaly to Belarusian Orthodox Church next, Gorbik says
- Constantinople moves to grant autocephaly to Ukrainian Church, outraging Moscow
- Three signs Moscow Patriarch Kirill knows he’s lost on Ukrainian autocephaly
- Ecumenical Patriarch to grant Ukrainian Orthodox autocephaly, Greek Church source says
- Waiting for Constantinople’s historical decision on Church autocephaly in Ukraine
- Implicitly conceding Ukrainian autocephaly, Moscow makes plans to split Orthodoxy and dominate one part of it, analysts say
