Copyright © 2021

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.


World’s response to Putin: More than 100 countries now seek limits on veto power in UN Security Council

Edited by: A. N.

Two weeks ago, 67 countries said they favored limiting the veto powers of permanent members of the UN Security Council; now, more than 100 do, perhaps the best indication of growing anger in the international community about how Vladimir Putin is using this power to block investigations into his aggression and crimes.

The right of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council has been in place since the founding of the United Nations 70 years ago, and while some countries have occasionally questioned it, there has never been the kind of groundswell of opposition to this practice as there is today.

In large measure, this reflects anger at Putin’s vetoing of efforts to investigate the shooting down of the Malaysian airline and more generally at the UN’s ineffectiveness in responding to Russian aggression in Ukraine.

An armed personnel carrier with Russian mercenaries in Donbas, Ukraine (Image:
An armed personnel carrier with Russian mercenaries in Donbas, Ukraine (Image:

Despite the numbers of countries backing change, it is far from clear that this effort will succeed, especially since other permanent members of the UN Security Council view the veto as something they need to defend either themselves or their clients. But the fact that it has gotten this far certainly highlights one of Putin’s greatest negative achievements.

Yesterday, Yury Sergeyev, Ukraine’s permanent representative to the United Nations, said that “more than 100 UN member countries support the initiative of France concerning the introduction of changes in the UN Charter which would limit the use of the veto” in the UN Security Council.

Russian aggression: Devastated building in Lysychansk, Ukraine, 4 August 2014 (Image: Ліонкінг)
Russian aggression: Devastated building in Lysychansk, Donbas, Ukraine, 4 August 2014 (Image: Ліонкінг)

The Ukrainian diplomat said that “the first hope” for change is that the permanent members themselves will agree “not to apply a veto in cases of open conflict which threaten human life,” but that in the absence of that, other countries will continue to press for change even though this question is “complex” because it involves the UN Charter itself.

This week, Sergeyev continued, there will be a special session called by France and Mexico to consider the French initiative. “Ukraine supports” it, as do “already more than 100 countries.” The task now is to get as many others to join them as possible in order to create “a critical mass” to pressure others.


Edited by: A. N.
You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!
Related Posts