European powers shift stance on frozen Russian asset seizure

France, Germany, and UK are moving toward seizing the frozen Russian Central Bank assets to Ukraine for military support if Russia violates a ceasefire.
european powers shift stance frozen russian asset seizure central bank russia file censornet c8dd6917e802e0e8265f98c863048590 increasingly willing consider seizing more than €200 billion assets eu develop plans potential ceasefire deal ukraine
Central Bank of Russia. File photo via censor.net
European powers shift stance on frozen Russian asset seizure

European powers are increasingly willing to consider seizing more than €200 billion of Russian assets frozen in the EU as they develop plans for a potential ceasefire deal in Ukraine. The diplomatic efforts, led by France and the UK, come in response to US President Donald Trump’s decision to open bilateral negotiations with Moscow allegedly aimed at ending the Russo-Ukrainian war. Trump’s recent confrontational meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has added urgency to finding alternative funding sources for Ukraine.

Key European capitals, including Berlin, Paris, and Brussels, had previously resisted the idea of seizing Russian central bank assets held in the EU due to concerns about setting a precedent under international law by seizing state property. France and Germany are now discussing with the UK and other countries ways these funds could be used to support Ukraine, the Financial Times reports.

French officials have proposed a plan where European capitals would seize the assets if Moscow violates a future ceasefire agreement in Ukraine, according to three people briefed on the talks cited by FT. This approach is seen as a way to hold Russia accountable to any agreement while providing Kyiv with security guarantees.

In 2022, G7 nations froze about €300 billion in Russian Central Bank assets after Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine. Most of it – roughly €190 billion – is held in Belgium’s Euroclear, with smaller amounts in France, the UK, Japan, Switzerland, and the US.

Currently, only the income generated by these assets – mostly cash and government bonds – is being used to repay G7 nations for $50 billion worth of loans to Ukraine, while the underlying assets remain untouched.

Growing support for complete asset transfer

Ukraine, Poland, and the Baltic States have long advocated for seizing the underlying assets.

Enough talking, it’s time to act!” Poland’s Prime Minister Donald Tusk wrote on X last month. “Let’s finance our aid for Ukraine from the Russian frozen assets.”

The Baltic Nations – Estonia, Lithuania, and Latvia – have joined this call.

The time is ripe now to take the next step,” Estonia’s Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna said last month, NYT reports.

Previous resistance from major European powers and changing the stance

During recent talks with Trump, French President Emmanuel Macron said seizing the assets immediately would not be “respecting international law” but suggested the money could be “part of the negotiation at the end of the war,” according to FT.

The European Central Bank has also expressed concerns that the euro’s status as a safe option for foreign reserves would be jeopardized, as most of the frozen assets are denominated in euros.

Germany’s chancellor-in-waiting Friedrich Merz has indicated he would consider backing a proposal involving seizing frozen Russian assets, FT reports, citing a person familiar with the matter. Merz was scheduled to speak with outgoing Chancellor Olaf Scholz to align positions ahead of a March 6 summit of EU leaders.

UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said on Monday that London was examining how the assets might be deployed.

Obviously the proceeds and profits are being used,” he told MPs after signing a deal with Zelenskyy for the UK to lend $2.8 billion to Ukraine backed by profits from Russian assets. “On the [underlying] assets themselves, it’s a very complicated issue. It’s not straightforward,” Starmer added. “But I do think we need to do more, and we are doing more work to look at what the possibilities are at least, along with other countries.”

The World Bank recently estimated that Ukraine needs $524 billion over 10 years for reconstruction, according to NYT.

Legal experts and government officials have previously warned that confiscating Russian assets could violate international law and undermine confidence in Western financial institutions. Some have expressed concern that American and European assets held in other countries might be more vulnerable in future disputes.

However, several legal and financial experts, including Lawrence H. Summers, a former Treasury secretary have argued that both the legal and financial hurdles could be overcome, NYT reports.

Related:

You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here



    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!

    Related Posts