ISW: Kremlin portrays Ukraine surrender terms as reasonable peace offer to manipulate Western opinion

Putin’s insistence on Ukraine accepting the 2022 Istanbul protocols, described as surrender terms for Ukraine, serves to distract from Russia’s failures to make a significant progress on the battlefield over the last two years.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Vladimir Putin
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Russian President Vladimir Putin, illustrative image. Photo via Eastnews.ua.
ISW: Kremlin portrays Ukraine surrender terms as reasonable peace offer to manipulate Western opinion

Russian President Vladimir Putin is attempting to manipulate ceasefire discussions regarding Ukraine in what appears to be an effort to undermine unity between Ukraine, the United States, and European partners, according to the analysis by the Institute for the Study of War (ISW).

This comes after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy spoke with President Trump and various NATO leaders on 10 May, where they collectively endorsed an immediate 30-day ceasefire proposal set to begin 12 May without preconditions. Afterwards, Zelenskyy proposed meeting Putin in Türkiye on 15 May  to pursue peace talks, emphasizing Ukraine’s readiness for dialogue but insisting on a full, unconditional ceasefire before any negotiations. However, Putin rejected the 30-day ceasefire proposal, insisting on direct talks without preconditions and suggesting a ceasefire might only be discussed during negotiations, with no commitment to halt hostilities beforehand.

Putin’s recent press conference and comments by Kremlin Spokesperson Dmitry Peskov are described as part of an attempt to inject Kremlin narratives into Western information spaces, according to ISW.

According to the analysis, this communication campaign aims to intimidate Ukraine and its allies into accepting Russia’s terms. This rhetoric serves to mask Russia’s lack of substantial military progress over the past two years, while Kremlin officials continue to insist on peace conditions that would effectively require Ukraine’s complete surrender, rejecting any compromise that doesn’t fully satisfy their demands.

Rather than accepting a joint US-Ukrainian-European proposal for a comprehensive 30-day ceasefire beginning 12 May, Putin instead proposed resuming direct bilateral negotiations with Ukraine on 15 May, based on the 2022 Istanbul protocols.

President Zelenskyy and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan accepted Putin’s proposal to hold talks in Türkiye. Zelenskyy stated he will personally wait for Putin in Türkiye and that Ukraine is still waiting for Russia to agree to the US-Ukrainian-European ceasefire proposal.

Putin is rejecting the joint Western ceasefire proposal while demanding Ukrainian surrender “in an attempt to secure his strategic goals by drawing out negotiations while continuing to make battlefield gains,” according to ISW.

Deputy Head of the Ukrainian Presidential Office Pavlo Palisa noted that Russia’s main objective remains to secure the administrative borders of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts and establish a “buffer zone” along Ukraine’s border in Kharkiv and Sumy oblasts to protect Russian territory from Ukrainian counterattacks.

Additionally, Russian forces are expected to attempt breakthroughs on the Zaporizhzhia front and conduct river-crossing operations in Kherson Oblast, which remains partially occupied.

European leaders, including France’s Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot, emphasized that negotiations cannot proceed “under drones” amid ongoing attacks.

2022 Istanbul protocols amount to Ukraine’s surrender

ISW characterizes these protocols as including terms that “would have amounted to Ukraine’s surrender and left Ukraine helpless to defend against potential future Russian aggression.”

The protocols from 2022 include severe Russian demands such as Ukraine becoming a permanently neutral state, renouncing NATO membership, drastically limiting its military forces to 85,000 soldiers and restricted weaponry, and prohibiting foreign military presence or aid. Russia also sought to install a pro-Moscow leader and grant official status to the Russian language in Ukraine.

The Kremlin’s position falsely portrays itself as willing to engage in good-faith negotiations while continuing attacks on Ukrainian positions and “setting conditions for further military aggression against Ukraine and NATO in the coming years,” the ISW concludes.

 

You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here



    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!