On 24 April in Washington, Ukrainian Finance Minister Serhii Marchenko told Reuters that despite progress, he does not expect the signing of a US President Donald Trump-proposed minerals deal between Ukraine and the United States this week. The two sides are still working through some unresolved issues, not detailed by Marchenko, Ukrainian representatives are working to seal a deal “as fast as we can.“
This comes after Marchenko and other Ukrainian officials met with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on 23 April to continue discussions on the proposed deal.
“We have a minerals deal, which I guess is going to be signed on Thursday, next Thursday,” Trump stated last week, referring to 24 April as a date of signing.
Marchenko emphasized the urgency of finalizing the agreement, but he added that a signing this week was unlikely.
“There was progress and now our teams are working very closely together,” Marchenko said, but without a specific timeline for completion. He added: “There are still some questions which we are discussing.”
The deal has faced significant delays. In February 2025, a planned signing was postponed following a tense meeting between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Oval Office.
In addition to the minerals pact, Marchenko and US officials have also discussed the issue of frozen Russian assets, which Ukraine wants to be transferred to Ukraine to cover war damages and losses caused by the ongoing war. Marchenko says Bessent has indicated that the resolution of this issue should be part of broader negotiations between the two countries.
Related:
- Trump says he may “take a pass” within days on his futile efforts to freeze Russo-Ukrainian war
- Ukrainian official denies that minerals deal turns past US aid into debt
- Ukraine and US sign memorandum of intent on critical minerals cooperation
- “Antagonistic” tone marks US-Ukraine minerals deal talks, says Reuters source
- Ukraine-US minerals deal talks to begin April 11-12 in Washington
- The US wants Ukraine’s minerals. The deal is worse than you think