Copyright © 2024 Euromaidanpress.com

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

NATO condemns Russia’s Black Sea mayhem but will only increase surveillance

The Alliance has issued condemnations of Russia’s missile attacks on the “grain deal,” but pledged only to increase surveillance, ten days after the Pentagon rejected an offer for the Navy to escort merchant ships.
NATO, illustrative image. Photo: Kenzo Tribuillard Getty Images.
NATO, illustrative image. Photo: Kenzo Tribuillard Getty Images.
NATO condemns Russia’s Black Sea mayhem but will only increase surveillance

On 26 July, the NATO-Ukraine Council held its first meeting, during which the Alliance condemned Russia’s unilateral suspension of participation in the Black Sea Grain Initiative and the shelling of Ukrainian port infrastructure. It also said it would ramp up surveillance measures, according to the official NATO portal.

“The Allies condemned Russia’s decision to withdraw from the Black Sea grain deal and its deliberate attempts to stop Ukraine’s agricultural exports on which hundreds of millions of people worldwide depend. They [NATO] also condemned Russia’s recent missile attacks on Odesa, Mykolaiv, and other port cities, including an attack on the Ukrainian facility in the Danube, close to the Romanian border,” NATO wrote.

NATO also welcomed Türkiye’s efforts to restore the “grain deal” and confirmed that they would continue to enhance surveillance and reconnaissance in the Black Sea region, including through maritime patrol aircraft and drones.

This meeting happened according to the new format of Ukraine-NATO relations — the Ukraine-NATO Council, which was established at the recent NATO summit. It is intended as a platform for Ukraine-NATO consultations in crises. So Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has requested it after Russia withdrew its security guarantees for shipping in the Black Sea, jeopardizing a deal to unblock Ukrainian grain exports.

Zelenskyy greeted the meeting:

“We welcome сlear and unequivocal condemnation by the Alliance of Russia’s withdrawal from the grain deal. Established only 2 weeks ago in Vilnius, the Council has already proved to be an effective mechanism for crisis consultations.

Ukraine will continue to fulfill its obligations in providing global food security and we value the support of the Allies in this regard. We stay united with the Alliance as we are moving along the path towards our NATO membership,” he tweeted.

After withdrawal from the “grain deal” brokered by Türkiye and the UN on 17 July, Russia began missile strikes on Ukraine’s port infrastructure. The biggest were:

  • On 19 July, attacked terminals and infrastructure at the ports of Odesa and Chornomorsk. Tanks and piers at Odesa port were damaged along with the grain infrastructure of international and Ukrainian traders, including Kernel, Viterra, and CMA CGM Group.
  • On 23 July, Russia destroyed the largest and oldest Orthodox Cathedral of Odesa in its night missile attack.

Attacking Ukraine’s port cities, Russia announced it would consider all ships traveling to Ukraine ports as potential carriers of military cargo. Such a statement threatened the food prices escalation and potential mass starvation, as grain ships could no longer safely transit the conflict-ridden waters of the Black Sea without the risk of a Russian attack.

To avoid the potential Russian attack and irreversible results of it, Ukraine set up a temporary shipping route to maintain grain shipments. Its idea was the ships were escorting via the territorial waters of NATO nations instead of via international waters in the black sea. The Pentagon discussed it but rejected it on 17 July.

Ukraine says that with the strikes, Russia blackmails the West to accept its demands to resume the grain corridor.

Since the NATO-Ukraine Council did not offer any realistic solution for the resumption of Ukraine’s Black Sea trade, and the USA refused the proposal to escort merchant vessels with navy ships, it is likely that Russia will feel free to continue its escalation in the Black Sea, as forecasted by Head of the Institute for Strategic Black Sea Studies, Andriy Klymenko.

He offers the following scenario for the Black Sea:

  • “NATO will continue to be irrationally afraid of Russia;

  • Russia will mockingly laugh at the impotent NATO, stop merchant ships for inspection (searches) and simulate air attacks on NATO reconnaissance drones, and continue to destroy port facilities in Ukrainian ports (including on the Danube); put its mining of approaches to Ukrainian ports on display, and stall for time before Putin visits or has a phone conversation with Erdogan;

  • When Türkiye sees that the Black Sea is turning into a ‘Russian lake,’ it will be forced to ‘escalate’ — that is, to send its shipowners’ merchant ships to Ukrainian ports or (as a last resort) to demonstrate its military presence in the Black Sea in some way;

  • Until this Turkish decision (if any), the only way for Ukrainian agricultural products to reach European ports will be by rail.”

Related:

You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here



    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!

    Related Posts
    survey results public opinion Ukraine
    Read More

    Ukrainians’ support for wartime criticism of authorities risen since 2022 

    When Russia’s full-scale invasion started in 2022, the majority of Ukrainians believed that it was not necessary to critisize the government to avoid destabilizing the situation, however a survey by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (KIIS) in May 2024 reveals that 31% of Ukrainians think criticism should be harsh and uncompromising, while 63% believe it should be constructive.