Copyright © 2024 Euromaidanpress.com

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Bakhmut withdrawal backpedaling suggests Prigozhin’s diminished leverage – ISW

Bakhmut withdrawal backpedaling suggests Prigozhin’s diminished leverage – ISW

Yevgeny Prigozhin, financier of the Wagner Group,has backpedaled on his earlier ultimatum to withdraw forces from Bakhmut, Ukraine, if Russia’s Ministry of Defense does not deliver sufficient ammunition, according to the Institute for the Study of War (ISW). His backtracking suggests a lack of leverage within the Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD), contrary to what was previously perceived.

Prigozhin, who was expected to enforce the withdrawal by his self-imposed deadline of 10 May, decided to continue fighting for Bakhmut despite not receiving the ammunition promised by the Russian MoD. On 9 May, Prigozhin revealed that Wagner received only 10% of the requested ammunition on 8 May. He added that an order from the Russian MoD threatened Wagner with treason if they withdrew from Bakhmut, likely a factor in his decision not to follow through with his threat.

Prigozhin’s failure to carry out his threat, as ISW notes, shows his awareness of his reliance on the Russian MoD. The financier had sought to pressure the MoD into prioritizing the Bakhmut offensive, hoping to claim an independent victory in the city. However, his inability to enforce his demands and his failure to reach Army General Sergey Surovikin, the deputy theater commander in Ukraine and the intermediary between the Russian MoD and Wagner, signal a lack of influence within the ministry.

In the same vein, Prigozhin used the Victory Day holiday to mock and question the judgment of President Putin, often referred to as the “grandfather.” He criticized unnamed figures, likely referring to Putin and senior Russian MoD figures, for showing off on Red Square. His escalating attacks on Putin, if left unchecked by the Kremlin, could further erode the established norm where individual actors can vie for position and influence but not openly criticize Putin.

You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here


    Will the West continue to support Ukraine?
    • Know what moves the world.
    • Premium journalism from across Europe.
    • Tailored to your needs, translated into English.
    Special discount
    for Euromaidan Press readers
    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!

    Related Posts