“Most of the cases we see start from some fact. It might be a real quote, real events and they are just turned to make it fake. It’s just believable enough so you can just click it and give it a read. I think there is definitely a problem there that fake news operators are good at telling stories in a way we traditional journalists tell it. Another thing is that it might take 7 days from the time the story posts until we fact check it and the label appears. So it’s 7 days that the story is going to go around the world. And a lot of people who have seen it think it’s true. There are a lot of different problems. For instance there are websites that you know might be half fake news. But you can’t just blacklist the website and say that everything on this site is fake news.”According to the expert, media literacy of readers is a solution for the situation. He also gave the most telling example of the irresponsible attitude to the information:
“In the case of Donald Trump we've heard a lot after the election that he said a lot of specific things which were false. But his supporters did not really penalize him for that. And he said many things they knew were false, but said he’s correct nonetheless. He could say that the health care law was bad. And he might give the statistics which might be wrong, but his voters would say 'He is right, because the health care law is bad'.”Still, Sharockman strongly believes that people want to hold their politicians accountable. So the media has to think about the best way to arm people for this.
Check what you read


Share your ideas
And now it’s time for you to share your experience in media literacy and your tools of proceeding information. Please give the answers to the following questions.- How do you identify whether a source is trustworthy?
- Do you use special instruments to verify information? Which ones?
- Which sources about Ukraine do you consider trustworthy?
- What helps you to not get lost in the floods of information?