Many Ukrainians remain “Soviet people” decades after collapse of the USSR. How to eliminate “Bolshevism of the mind”?

A Soviet placard featuring Stalin and peoples of the USSR, Ukrainians are represented by a woman in vyshyvanka embroidered shirt on the left. The text reads, "Under leadership of great Stalin, forward to communism!"

A Soviet placard featuring Stalin and peoples of the USSR, Ukrainians are represented by a woman in vyshyvanka embroidered shirt on the left. The text reads, "Under leadership of great Stalin, forward to communism!" 

More, Ukraine

Article by: Vira Hyrych
Soviet traits continue to dominate the consciousness of Ukrainians: antagonism towards one another, intolerance, and split moralities.

In the evening of 25 October 1917, a blank shot from the forecastle gun of the Cruiser “Aurora” signaled the start of the assault on the Winter Palace in Saint Petersburg, which was to be the beginning of the Bolshevik Revolution. Her salvo introduced a new political class – the proletariat – to the rulers of the Russian Empire. This political movement was led by the Bolsheviks – “the Majority” – the wing of the Communist Party led by Vladimir Lenin, and its instruments were war, terror, deliberate starvation of millions, repression, and deportations. And although Bolshevism has long ago ceased to be the sole political idea in Ukraine. Consequences of that Avrora’s blank shot are still felt to this day.

A Soviet kindergarten. In the USSR, the paternalist figure of "grandfather Lenin" was coming into your life at kindergarten and haunted you for the rest of your life. Photograph:

A Soviet kindergarten. In the USSR, the paternalist figure of “grandfather Lenin” was coming into your life at kindergarten and then haunted you for the rest of your life. Photograph:

In 2012 the Institute of Global Politics analyzed, in a special investigation, the effects of post-Soviet life in the politics and societies of several countries which once constituted the USSR, and discovered no small number of common features. Inherent to each was a single and similar worldview, reflected in the behavior of people and which displayed itself in politics.

Life strategy of post-Soviet people

Paternalism. Post-Soviet people overwhelmingly look to the state as a holy, all-powerful authority which must offer solutions to all problems.

Conformity. Post-Soviet people, when making decisions or plans, often take consideration only of “what other people would say”, or decide “I want to be like everybody else.”

Late Adoption of Innovations and Fear of Reform. Post-Soviet people very often do not understand the significance of reforms, and neither adopt nor desire changes. The fear of reform was created in Soviet times by collectivization and industrialization.

Intolerance. Post-Soviet people are not always ready to understand or willingly tolerate people of other cultures, societies, religions, or sexualities.

Opposition to Individualism. Individualism is not valued by Soviet people. This phenomenon may be observed in the low value which post-Soviet individuals place in themselves.

Social Alienation. Post-Soviet people feel alienated from even their closest social surroundings. They may throw their garbage in the elevators and dirty the walls of the buildings in which they live. They feel only minimal responsibility towards each other.

Undervaluing Talent and Knowledge. The overwhelming majority of post-Soviet people are unable to appreciate talent, capability or mastery of skills in other people.

These features form a specific model of behavior: lack of principles, unfriendliness, an irrational way of life. In politics, these features show themselves in the apparent predominance of nepotism, in the perception of statecraft as a business-project, in personalities overpowering institutions, in the privileges of status and the absence of responsibility for lying to the public.
Labor Day demonstration. Kyiv, 1980s.

Labor Day demonstration. Kyiv, the 1980s.

For several years these tendencies, despite the warnings of experts, became the political mainstream. The prevalence of populism in contemporary Ukrainian politics is something about which everybody speaks. But not a single Ukrainian politician has ever lost voter support by lying. And none ever took political responsibility for it.

Which traits of Soviet mentality predominate in Ukrainians

Sociological investigations up to the present have determined certain Soviet traits which dominate the mentality of Ukrainians: inclination towards simplification of the situation, antagonism towards one another, intolerance and a split morality.


They vocally criticize political corruption and peacefully tolerate a corrupt way of life, with a Bolshevik flourish they generalize all flaws and refuse to notice the benefits.

For example, research by the Institute of Sociology has shown that the majority of Ukrainians consider others immoral. In one questionnaire 70.8% of those surveyed affirmed the belief that other Ukrainians would commit dishonest acts for their own benefit. According to Yevhen Holovakha, a sociologist, this reflects the fact that a part of Ukrainian society is attracted towards a simplification of any situation. Instead of distinguishing for themselves who acts ethically who does not, most prefer to think of everybody as unethical.

Educated people, according to Holovakha, are less likely to consider others unethical and are less inclined to generalize about the immorality of society as a whole, even if they encounter dishonest behavior in multiple situations. An example of the difference in perceptions is illustrated by posing a question to students, whether or not they would tell their teacher, if their friend wrote on a desk. In the post-Soviet system of values to do so seems unethical, even a betrayal. On the other hand, most European students responded that they would tell their teachers. Holovakha explains: the majority of affirmative responses (“Yes, I would tell the teacher”) came from wealthier countries.

Moss-covered "last Lenin in Kyiv" found after decommunization. The monument was recently discovered by construction workers while building the new Ring Road. Photograph:

Moss-covered “last Lenin of Kyiv” discovered this month by construction workers after most of the monuments to the Soviet-era leaders were dismantled amid decommunization in Ukraine. Photograph:

The 2016 sociological questionnaire entitled Who are We and who do We Imagine Ourselves to be? from the Renaissance and Democratic Initiatives foundations showed that despite the perception of change reflected in society, only a minority of Ukrainians are ready to change their own behaviors. Ukrainians noticed the rise of citizen activism, but most remained passive. 50% of respondents considered themselves more ready to take part in civic organizations, but only 18% of those questioned actually took part in activism. 43% considered that they were more willing to take part in political life, but only 12% actually took on a greater role in politics. The result, sociologists believe, attests to the sidelining of society from politics.

The same division was observed in questions over the control of the civil authority. 44% of those questioned believed that participation is rising, versus only 16% of respondents who were ready to take more control over civil authority.

The resolution of problems is in the hands of others

Questionnaires show that the majority of Ukrainians believe others are capable of dishonest actions, though they will not believe themselves capable of dishonest actions. Ukrainians witness changes in society, but demonstrate an unwillingness to likewise change themselves. They take note of civic activism around themselves, but nonetheless choose to remain passive. They celebrate the success in taking control of authorities, but they show no similar willingness to exercise self-control.

Experts have begun to speak about a new aspect of paternalism: instead of all-embracing faith in the state, a new faith is forming in civic organizations. A common feature of both is this: others must be responsible for the order of society.

In the previous years, many talked about the lack of responsibility in society and that this tendency, which is inherent to post-Soviet countries, further spread itself across the globe and became a common threat to democracy.

Politically incompetent citizens are not able to make good decisions. This makes the mechanisms of elections ineffective and makes the idea of democracy worthless as an institution. Tied to this tendency is the Brexit, the radicalization of political moods in Europe, the result of the presidential election in the USA. In Ukraine It brings with it the threat of political revenge and less effective reforms. Incompetent voters bring demagogues to power. But few voters connect fraud in politics and in power with their own foolish choices.

Read more:

Translated by: Peter Koropey

Edited by: Yuri Zoria


Dear readers! Since you’ ve made it to this point, we have a favor to ask. Russia’s hybrid war against Ukraine is ongoing, but major news agencies have gone away, which is why it's extra important to provide news about Ukraine in English. We are a small independent journalist team on a shoestring budget, have no political or state affiliation, and depend on our readers to keep going (using the chanсe - a big thank you to our generous supporters, we couldn't make it without you.)  If you like what you see, please help keep us online with a donation

Tags: , , , , ,


  1. Avatar Hurd Harley says:

    I see some contradictory stuff here. If Ukrainians are conformist and look to the state to solve their problems; why do they report someone who writes on his desk less than Europeans? And sure, their talk about civic activism is bigger than their actual participation. But 18% who actually are active is a big number; bigger than corresponding % in USA, I think.

  2. Avatar veth says:

    Head of Luhansk People’s Republic resigns

    Pasechnyk claimed that the LPR will stick to the support of the Minsk Agreements after the resign of Plotnytsky.

  3. Avatar Tony says:

    Any country can improve on its cultural flaws, Ukraine is no exception and in my opinion this is the #1 most important reform for any society.

    Germany, Japan and russia were destroyed in WW2 yet Germany and Japan rebuilt themselves to an even higher level, meanwhile russia went in circles.
    Africa has large mineral resources yet remains poor. Singapore is tiny and without significant natural resources yet it is extremely well developed, neighbouring Malaysia which used to hold Singapore as a territory meanwhile lags behind. Taiwan, its basically a break away part of China and it enjoys a far higher GDP per capita than China. What can explain these differences in performance if not culture? Government styles, maybe but to change government wouldnt one first need to change the cultural norms and expectations? I know its unpopular to admit cultural flaws but doing so is the first step towards improvement.

    1. Avatar AmounRah says:

      “I know its unpopular to admit cultural flaws but doing so is the first step towards improvement.”
      Is this why any cornered Ukietroll resorts to derogatory comments towards any non-anti-Russian poster?
      Just wondering….

  4. Avatar treepot says:

    Resistance to Moscow’s rule was not restricted to western Ukraine (Halycyna and Bukovyna) during WWI. Resistance to Communist invasion occurred in several eastern regions as well, including Kholodney Yar. Eastern Ukraine was under Moscow control for over 300 years, thus behavior of that population can be interpreted from several perspectives, including Stockholm Syndrome. There is no doubt that Ukraine has chosen Western style of living, although their overall behavior does not resemble any of their neighbors. This article chose to compare that behavior to that of Russia, but by the same token one would find many similarities to Ukraine’s western neighbors.

  5. Avatar zorbatheturk says:

    What an evil bunch the Bolshies were, and their successors, the Castros, Putins, Chavezes, Mugabes, Maduros, Ortegas, Xis, etc. Assclowns United.

    1. Avatar gmab says:

      Getting rid of PUtin is a good start. Had he not accepted the deal to protect Yeltsin & his corruption, Nemtsov, who was Yeltsin’s first choice would be president now. Berezowky, a corrupt oligarch who brokered the deal liked KGB Putler also- big mistake for him. Nemtsov would have steered the country in the right direction towards a stable democracy. Putin has relied on this soviet craze he instigated & fanned to hysteria to save himself & distract Russians from the disaster of his new Russia.

      1. Avatar zorbatheturk says:

        Damn good analysis. RuSSia under Putin is farked.