Lenincrash – Ukrainian performance  art 

Lenin hits the dust in Kharkiv, September 28, 2014

Lenin hits the dust in Kharkiv, September 28, 2014 

2016/03/14 • Analysis & Opinion, Culture, History, Ukraine

Article by: Nazar Zanos, political commentator, columnist

In Ukraine, toppling Lenin statues fulfills a number of objectives: it’s a popular spectacle, desacrilization of old myths, destructurization of historical figures, letting off steam and overt intimidation of ideological opponents

It’s very difficult to understand Ukrainian politics as politics per se. This is often due to its pettiness, monotony and primitive character. Therefore, Ukrainians want to interpret and perceive any spectacular displays of politics differently, read it in the light of more complex phenomena, draw analogies, build bridges, connect it to other events because politics does not exist in a vacuum, but interacts with other social sectors and domains. It definitely should not be viewed in a one-dimensional manner, but rather examined closely from several aspects as it contains codes that help us understand other areas of Ukrainian society.

Lenins-Staue-Is-Demolished-Kyiv-Ukraine-Double-Barrelled-Travel

Lenin demolished in Kyiv during Euromaidan protests, December 8, 2013

Today, most social and political life in Ukraine reflected in art revolves around the same themes: war, the annexation of Crimea, the occupied territories, reforms, decommunization, etc.  These themes first pass through the prism of media, politicians and culture activists, and then make their way through the country, penetrating all layers and classes of society.

F26E2DF5-8AE0-431B-B867-D87C0964E6EE_w600_r0_s

Pulling down Lenin in Kharkiv, September 28, 2014

Recently, Dnipropetrovsk got rid of its monument to Soviet revolutionary Hryhoriy Petrovsky; now residents and the city council are talking about renaming the city. Two years have passed since the Lenincrash phenomenon started in Ukraine. So, it would be a sin not to examine this particular element of decommunization. Lenincrash is worth looking at from a different perspective, as a popular manifestation. Perhaps we should also consider it an artistic performance and not an act of vandalism?

D6BCB6BB-79EA-4C69-B31F-E013B94ADBEA_w600_r0_s

Petrovsky falls in Dnipropetrovsk, January 29, 2016

The Maidan, like any major uprising, generated a flurry of folk art. Besides poetry, songs, kolomyyky, cartoons, caricatures, paintings and interesting political slogans, protesters created different and colourful means of artistic expression, such as performances, flash mobs, happenings and action events. Lenincrash fits perfectly into this context. In fact, it’s all of the fore-mentioned tied into one! And, it responds perfectly and eclectically to the desires of the Ukrainian people.

Lenincrash resembles a popular carnival… a theatrical performance with assigned roles and actions that are allowed before Christian Lent. It’s a carnival where masks are replaced by balaklavas, both of which are used for the same purpose. Don’t even try to pretend that no one will recognize you! As an actor/activist, you try to create an illusion of secrecy, a protective wall against judgments, and permission to be yourself for a while, forget about your boring daily routine and surrender to baser instincts allowed by pre-Lenten celebrations. But, you know very well that these masquerades and processions will soon end, and life won’t be all fun and buffoonery.

Like other complex popular phenomena, toppling Lenin statues fulfills a number of objectives: it’s a popular spectacle, desacrilization of old myths, destructurization of historical figures, letting off steam and overt intimidation of ideological opponents.

A81DE085-360E-4D83-A843-2C5074680270_w600_r0_s

Celebrating after Lenin’s downfall in Kharkiv, September 28, 2014

Maidan and the Middle Ages  

Given so many references to the Middle Ages (alarms, tolling of church bells, taking refuge behind church walls, building barricades and fortresses, violent clashes on Hrushevskoho, etc.), and the significant role of priests and churches in the Revolution of Dignity, the Lenincrash phenomenon can be viewed as an effort by Ukrainians to unconsciously repeat an event described in Povisti Mynulykh Lit (Tale of Bygone Years): “When [Prince Volodymyr] arrived, he ordered the idols to be destroyed – some were cut to pieces and others were burnt. He ordered the god Perun to be tied to a horse’s tail and dragged from the Mountain along Borichevo [descent] to the creek, and twelve men were to beat [him] with large sticks.”

This attempt to repeat Prince Volodymyr’s act has one objective – to desacrilize Lenin. In turn, desacrilization leads to the reconstruction of old myths and the creation of new ones, preparing the terrain for innovative ideas, cults and practices.

In addition, Lenincrash is a therapy to combat trauma caused not so much by the actual collapse of the Soviet Union, but by insufficient knowledge of traumatic experiences suffered by the Ukrainian population during this period. The symbolic act of destroying the “leader of the proletariat” and removing him from his pedestal should break all ties with the previous era, with the horrifying past, and help relieve post-traumatic syndromes. What was supposed to happen, but didn’t happen, in the eighties and nineties must be implemented now. There is great hope that such symbolic acts will make a difference.

When the Lenincrash phenomenon spread from Halychyna (western Ukraine) to all regions of the country, it demonstrated that the cult of the personality was finally debunked. Lenin is no more a sacred figure for the Ukrainian people.

Vandalism or art?

Many artists, art critics and public figures claim that Lenincrash is mere vandalism. It really could be treated as hooliganism or barbarism if artistic expression wasn’t a part of Lenin “hitting the dust”.

If anyone doubts that Lenincrash has a destructurizing feature, we refer them to other performances, such as Piotr Pavlensky setting fire to the door of FSB headquarters, Pussy Riot performances, the simulated sex performance presented near the Verkhovna Rada by blogger activist Oleksandr Volodarsky, the #onvacation event performed by Ukrainian artists and activists in the Russian pavilion at the Venice Biennale, etc.

Pavlensky-artist-Provocateur-6

Artist Piotr Pavlensky during a protest action titled “Threat”‘ in front of the Federal Security Service (FSB) headquarters in central Moscow, November 9, 2015

As a form of folk art, Lenincrash must appeal to the collective subconscious and to deeper instincts in order to be understood by the masses. It may cause fear in some and great joy in others. New folk art has no clear guidelines; that’s why it’s so chaotic and must grope its way forward, relying on old familiar techniques and genres.

Lenincrash is also a fight against the totalitarian regime that denied any other art but social realism, censored everything and left no room for creativity. Now, artists and critics, both leftists and libertarians, protect what was embodied in the era of censorship from actual “censorship”. There is no more instinct of self-preservation…

Finally, if we consider Lenincrash as a symbiosis of artistic techniques, we can assume that interpreting it as an act of barbarism is akin to censoring folk art. This is done by people who detest moral values ​​and references to censorship.

No less paradoxical is the fact that many monuments to Lenin and other Soviet leaders do not have the slightest artistic value, but the people who organize such events and pull down old idols turn their action into real performance art.

 

Translated by: Christine Chraibi
Source: Radio Liberty

Tags: , , ,

  • Nowhere Girl

    Perhaps I’m wrong, but if I remember well – first, the deadline for changing communist names is already over, and second – Dnipropetrovsk has already been renamed… to Dnipropetrovsk, but in honor of some non-communist with that name.
    This is called free decommunisation and is a very good idea. It’s also widely used in Poland. While we hardly had any communist city names – Katowice were at one point renamed Stalinogród, but returned to their previous name already in 1956 – we of course had lots of street names that needed to be changed. (In fact, some are still left. However, personally I DON’T support changing street names such as People’s Army Avenue – even though the People’s Army depended on the communist party, they also fought in the war and deserve some respect.) So the free decommunisation process looks like this: one needs to find some known person – at least a bit known, it may be for example a local historian, an artist, a scientist… – with the same name as the street patron. Then the city council issues a declaration that the street is named after that person and that’s all – no name is actually changed and people are spared formalities and costs related to changing their documents.
    If I remember well, Dniprodzerzhynsk has already been renamed too – to Dniprodzerzhynsk, but after the brother of Bloody Felix, who by the way studied in Kharkiv and so could be considered a person with some relationship to that region…

    • Lev Havryliv

      What “people’s army”? Ukraine was under Russian Communist occupation after being conquered by the Red Army.

      It is time to dump every last vestige of the brutal Russian Czarist and Russian Communist colonial rule and oppression of Ukraine.