Putin follows Hitler and Stalin in seeking to repress Jehovah’s Witnesses

Image: jw-russia.org 

International, More

In declaring the Jehovah’s Witnesses an extremist organization, Vladimir Putin’s regime is following in the steps of Hitler and Stalin both of whom sought to extirpate this religious group. Neither was successful, and Putin is unlikely to be either. But his moves against it represent another attack on religious freedom and freedom in general in Russia.

Yesterday, the Russian Supreme Court declared the Jehovah’s Witnesses an extremist organization on the basis of a complaint by the justice ministry, banned its continued functioning on the territory of the Russian Federation and transferred all the property of the religious organization to the state.

In Russia today, this could not have happened without the approval of Vladimir Putin and so he must be held accountable for an action that echoes the efforts of earlier dictators to wipe out the Jehovah’s Witnesses, efforts that not only have been ineffectual – the Witnesses have simply gone underground – but have been denounced as a threat to the freedom of all.

Following the Russian court’s decision, numerous Russian commentators pointed out both the absurdity of its reasoning, the near certainty that the decision won’t end the activities of the Witnesses, but the equal certainty that Moscow’s moves against them presage further moves against other religious and civic groups.

Yegor Sedov pointedly entitled his commentary, “Those Hitler Repressed Have Been Declared Extremists in Russia,” and suggested those behind the case in Russia were behaving in exactly the same way the Nazis did. At the same time, he said, the new ban is unlikely to stop the 175,000 Witnesses in Russia.

Other experts on religious affairs agreed, pointing out that the Witnesses had learned how to work under repressive regimes in Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union and would do the same now under Putin (see newsland.com, blog.oup.com and rbc.ru).

And still a third group – Lev Levinson is emblematic of its position – argued that Russians must see the attack on the Jehovah’s Witnesses as an attack on all of them because without freedom of conscience and religious belief, there is no religious freedom and consequently no freedom in general.



Edited by: A. N.

Dear readers! Since you’ ve made it to this point, we have a favor to ask. Russia’s hybrid war against Ukraine is ongoing, but major news agencies have gone away, which is why it's extra important to provide news about Ukraine in English. We are a small independent journalist team on a shoestring budget, have no political or state affiliation, and depend on our readers to keep going (using the chanсe - a big thank you to our generous supporters, we couldn't make it without you.)  If you like what you see, please help keep us online with a donation

Tags: , , , , , ,


  1. Avatar Robert says:

    So, to continue the analogy, does vlady perish as did hitler?

    1. Avatar Alex George says:


  2. Avatar Alex George says:

    The JWs are pacifists.

    I guess that makes them “extremists” – they don’t believe in shooting anyone.

  3. Avatar Terry Washington says:

    Erm, how are Jehovah’s Witnesses extremists?!

    1. Avatar zorbatheturk says:

      They do have some weird ideas.

    2. Avatar Quartermaster says:

      They are completely apolitical, something Putin can’t tolerate.

  4. Avatar zorbatheturk says:

    All RuSSians are allowed to worship only the Putin and the RuSSian state.

    1. Avatar Quartermaster says:

      The lyrics to the revised Stalinist national anthem refers to “our sacred state.”

      1. Avatar zorbatheturk says:

        Since every single nation state is an artificial entity, investing them with any kind of spurious holiness is ludicrous. A state acquires legitimacy if it provides a decent life for its citizens, protects various freedoms, and also makes some kind of geopolitical sense. The RF tends to fail on those metrics. It is just a bunch of ex-KGB crooks sitting in the Krumlin.