The American style of identity Moscow fears to seek for Russians

The Mordvins, one of the indigenous ethnicities composing modern-day Russians. Photo of 1872.

The Mordvins, one of the indigenous ethnicities composing modern-day Russians. Photo of 1872. 

2017/02/15 - 13:15 • Analysis & Opinion, Russia

Those in Moscow who want Russians and non-Russians within the borders of the Russian Federation to give up their ethnic identities in favor of a political identity as ‘Rossiyane‘ often suggest that they are doing no more than copying the kind of political identity the United States has promoted.

But a Ukrainian portal has pointed out how wrong they are because Americans are and even are encouraged to be proud of their ethnic heritage and instead of shifting from their ethnic identities in becoming Americans combine the two and proudly declare that they are both ethnic and American.

Unfortunately, ethnic Russians continue to be denied this opportunity because to speak of their ethnic origins is to highlight their diversity and the fact that the word “Russian” is an adjective rather than a noun that modifies but doesn’t replace the underlying ethnic communities it has been applied to.

“In the US,” the portal says, “live more than 300 million people who speak 322 languages. Those who are citizens call themselves Americans but at the same time they clearly recall their roots, know about their origin and do not forget their ancestors.” They will tell you that they are “American Jews or Ethiopians or Irish or Poles or Chinese.”

“Practically EVERY American knows his or her nationality and as rule is proud of it: there are numerous ethnic festivals and parades.” There are a few who “consider themselves simply Americans [but] as a rule, these are children of mixed marriages who are not particularly interested in their genealogy.”

The writer continues that he has never met anyone in the US who was not proud of both his ethnic background and his citizenship.

“Why then do the representatives of the more than 180 peoples of Russia limit their national membership to an ADJECTIVE?” Why don’t you say that you are a Russian Mordvin or Pomor or Tuvin or Karel? Is it that you don’t know WHO you are? Or are you ashamed to recognize your national attachment? Or do you simply NOT WANT to know this?”

“WHY?”

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Five hundred years ago, there were no ethnic Russians, the portal continues. “The name RUSSIANS appeared after the Moscow princes beginning with Ivan the Terrible decided to build an empire” by engaging in wars of conquest and then calling the conquered peoples “RUSSIANS” even if they were Bashkirs or Chuvash or Buryats or Chukchis or Eskimos.

Some, but far from all of these primordial peoples, were able to retain their culture and even something of their identity, but the appearance of the name “RUSSIAN” which was thought up by Moscow tsars and forcibly applied to the population didn’t provide an adequate substitute for the content that was lost.

As a result, many who call themselves Russians found themselves without a clear definition of what that meant, and the 1917 revolution only made things worse by promoting “a new synonym for Russian: the SOVIET MAN or SOVOK.” And many have not been able to escape from that because they don’t know what they could replace it with.

Ukrainians who interact with Russians are compelled to ask: why do Russians continue to remain people who do not recall where they are from, who are satisfied with a national identity based on an adjective rather than a noun and one that was imposed from the top down not for their benefit but for the benefit of the imperial state?

And that leads to others: “why are [Russians], who are in fact representatives of various peoples and tribes turning away from their ethnicity, betraying in this way their ancestors, their historical roots and their national uniqueness? Why are [they] continuing to remain one” with few rights and many divisions? “Isn’t it time to change something?”

To ask those questions, of course, explains why Moscow is trying to impose the new political identity without any real ethnic content because to do otherwise would bring the entire falsity of the Russian identity as currently constructed into focus not only for others but for the Russians themselves.


Related:

 

Edited by: A. N.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

  • http://www.krantvannederland.nl/ Cees Boogaart

    In fact its even worse, the name RUS, and history was stolen from Ukraine , before 1721 and before 1000 whats now most Ukraine was called RUS(S) , Black Sea was called RUSS sea by Arabs.
    Before 1721 around Moscow was called Muscovy, but that can’t be applied to rest of RF.
    Russia as such never was, is , or will be a country!

    • laker48

      Exactly!

  • Alex George

    The Mordvins in the photo at the top of the page look REALLY happy about being Russian!

    • zorbatheturk

      LOL. Probably thinking ” Hey, where’s MY frikkin green card! “

  • zorbatheturk

    SARC on.

    Ivan the Terrible, Putin the Horrible, Stalin the Mass-mudering Genocidal Psychopath… gee, RuSSians are so lucky to have such wise and compassionate rulers.

    SARC off.