For me, well it's fairly obvious to me that the trouble in Donbas didn't come from within. In the space of 6 months of walking past the main square twice each day, I rarely saw Russian/Soviet demonstrations but when I did, there were no more than 2 or 3 people showing interest. Almost everyone walked past and made negative comments or laughed. And I'd like to do a report on Sloviansk as the before, during and after really does show the truth about what's happening elsewhere in Donbas and Crimea. The simple story of how quickly the terror ends immediately after the invaders leave. There in Sloviansk is a massive uncovering of the truth where people are now free of terror and able to connect the dots. However, I have already noticed some previous Russian news about Sloviansk have been withdrawn because they are target to locals being able to identify it as fake. One such example is a particular hole in the side of a particular building seen on most Media channels with claims of ATO responsibility. However, people connected with that building in Sloviansk have quite a different story about that hole in the wall. It's one thing to expose StopFakes but it would go a step further to be able to make more thorough investigations of some of these cases that affect real people. And go into these places and talk with everyone. Certainly nobody from Russian media asked anyone from that building about the events. They just were instructed where and when the hole would appear to go and take the photos. Some foreign correspondents took videos and made similar stories under the advice of people disguised as locals who appeal on the spot. Someone also needs to produce a simple but comprehensive overview of Russia and Ukrainian History - both distant and more recent. And to show the events that contributed to factors that made Crimea and Donbas targets for Putin. We know the Crimean referendum results are fake and irrelevant but the situation where Russian ethnicity is the majority there has been seen by some international viewers as a potential justification. To me, when connected with history it's quite the opposite. We see isolated reports about things like a few Russian historians opposing this or that. Most don't see it. Only those with a heightened interest for truthful information about Ukraine will see all reports and piece everything together. Nobody else will and especially Russians or those enraged about Ukraine by the Save the Donbas fake news. Only simple and well presented reports that compare the facts are likely to reach a wide audience. One well presented short documentary should be sufficient to connect information to make it impossible for people to argue that most of Russia's history is a construction. Such a project would require a lot of research. And I haven't seen a simple report that collects various simple statements by Putin and others that show a clear picture of Russia's involvement and their admission of guilt. It would be difficult though to present as a documentary rather than a comedy show. I'm sure lots of people are frustrated about the lies of this war and have ideas they would like to present." [hr]Sam King can be contacted at sam (a) ukraine.co.nz
You are running out of time, Europe
It’s time to face the truth. Western “media democracies” are a crucial agenda-setter for politics. The fact that…