Trump’s mineral deal demands higher GDP share from Ukraine than Germany’s WWI reparations

A leaked contract reveals Trump’s demand for a $500 billion “payback” from Ukraine for previous aid, granting the US economic control, as per The Telegraph.
President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Donald Trump. Photo: president.gov.ua
President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy and US President Donald Trump. Photo: president.gov.ua
Trump’s mineral deal demands higher GDP share from Ukraine than Germany’s WWI reparations

The Telegraph has obtained a confidential draft contract revealing Donald Trump’s demands for a $500 billion “payback” from Ukraine for the previous US aid amid the ongoing Russian invasion. The contract implied establishing US economic control over the country’s resources in perpetuity. As we reported earlier, Ukraine had rejected Trump’s proposal.

Ukraine possesses 109 significant mineral deposits, including titanium, rare-earth metals, and natural gas. Some are in Russian-occupied or front-line areas. Their full value remains uncertain due to the ongoing Russian invasion and regulatory hurdles. In early 2024, state energy firm Naftogaz reported over $500 million in profits, highlighting the sector’s economic importance.

The pre-decisional contract, marked “Privileged & Confidential” and dated 7 February 2025, landed at Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s office a week ago, The Telegraph reports.

According to the document, the US and Ukraine would form a joint investment fund ensuring “hostile parties to the conflict do not benefit from the reconstruction of Ukraine.” The agreement covers the “economic value associated with resources of Ukraine,” including “mineral resources, oil and gas resources, ports, other infrastructure (as agreed).

The contract stipulates that “this agreement shall be governed by New York law, without regard to conflict of laws principles,” Telegraph reports.

Under the terms, the US would take 50% of recurring revenues received by Ukraine from resource extraction and 50% of the financial value of “all new licenses issued to third parties” for future resource monetization. The contract establishes “a lien on such revenues” in favor of the US.

That clause means ‘pay us first, and then feed your children,’” one source close to the negotiations told Telegraph.

The draft further states that “for all future licenses, the US will have a right of first refusal for the purchase of exportable minerals.” Washington would acquire near-total control over most of Ukraine’s commodity and resource economy, with the fund having “the exclusive right to establish the method, selection criteria, terms, and conditions” of all future licenses and projects.

Infographic: The Telegraph

Telegraph says the document appears to have been written by private lawyers, not the US departments of state or commerce.

President Zelenskyy himself proposed giving the US a stake in Ukraine’s rare earth elements and critical minerals during a visit to Trump Tower in September, hoping to secure continued arms deliveries.

However, Telegraph reports Zelenskyy likely did not expect terms normally imposed on defeated aggressor states, which exceed financial penalties imposed on Germany and Japan after 1945.

Infographic: The Telegraph

A new Versailles

If accepted, Trump’s demands would claim “a higher share of Ukrainian GDP than reparations imposed on Germany at the Versailles Treaty, later whittled down at the London Conference in 1921, and by the Dawes Plan in 1924. At the same time, he seems willing to let Russia off the hook entirely,” The Telegraph says.

Donald Trump told Fox News that Ukraine had “essentially agreed” to the $500 billion arrangement. He warned Ukraine would face Russian control if it rejected the terms:

“They may make a deal. They may not make a deal. They may be Russian someday, or they may not be Russian someday. But I want this money back,” Trump threatened.

The American President claimed the US had allegedly spent $300 billion on the war, saying it would be “stupid” to provide more aid. The Telegraph notes that the five congressional packages actually total $175 billion, with $70 billion spent in the US on weapons production. While some funding was humanitarian grants, much was lend-lease money requiring repayment, The Telegraph stated.

Impossible demands

Ukraine cannot realistically meet the $500 billion demand within any reasonable timeframe, The Telegraph argues, questioning whether it is appropriate to treat a nation that has defended democracies for three years at great sacrifice.

The Telegraph characterizes Trump’s demand as “iron-fist coercion by a neo-imperial power against a weaker nation with its back to the wall, and all for a commodity bonanza that exists chiefly in Trump’s head.”

Related:

You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here



    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!