Copyright © 2024 Euromaidanpress.com

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Biden pardons his son, draws bipartisan criticism

Hunter biden in Ukraine, bruisma
Hunter and Joe Biden in 2016. Photo: Kris Connor/WireImage
Biden pardons his son, draws bipartisan criticism

Outgoing President Joe Biden has pardoned his son Hunter Biden over federal tax and gun crimes, for which he was supposed to be sentenced this month.

The pardon covers offenses he “has committed or may have committed or taken part in” between 1 January 2014 and 1 December 2024. This includes the period when he joined the board of the Ukrainian energy company Burisma.

Biden had repeatedly denied that he’d pardon his son before claiming Sunday that the charges were politically motivated.

“No reasonable person who looks at the facts of Hunter’s cases can reach any other conclusion than Hunter was singled out only because he is my son – and that is wrong,” Biden said.

President’s decision drew anger from both sides of the political spectrum. Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.) took to X (Twitter) to state that “Joe Biden has lied from start to finish about his family’s corrupt influence peddling activities.” He added: “Not only has he falsely claimed that he never met with his son’s foreign business associates and that his son did nothing wrong, but he also lied when he said he would not pardon Hunter Biden.”

Meanwhile, Rep. Greg Stanton (D-Ariz.) wrote that while he respects President Biden, he believes that he “got this one wrong.”

“This wasn’t a politically-motivated prosecution. Hunter committed felonies, and was convicted by a jury of his peers,” he added.

Hunter Biden’s long-standing connections with Ukraine have been a source of major contention among the Republicans who believe that the outgoing President personally benefitted from his son’s opaque business deals. While no meaningful evidence was produced to substantiate the claim, it has greatly impacted the GOP’s perception of Ukraine and Ukraine-related affairs.

Burisma ceased to exist in 2023.

You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here



    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!

    Related Posts