Copyright © 2024 Euromaidanpress.com

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

ISW: Recent Russian missile strike shows no new nuclear threat

Russia showcased its missile capabilities with a strike on Dnipro using new ballistic missiles, alongside Putin’s threats to the West, continuing Moscow’s nuclear deterrence rhetoric.
isw recent russian missile strike shows new nuclear threat rs-26 rubezh thought what putin calls oreshnik media militarnyi b11673dcccf3647b russia showcased its capabilities dnipro using ballistic missiles alongside putin's threats
RS-26 “Rubezh” thought to be what Putin calls the Oreshnik. Photo: Russian media, via Militarnyi.
ISW: Recent Russian missile strike shows no new nuclear threat

The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) assesses that neither Russia’s recent Oreshnik ballistic missile strike on Ukraine nor President Vladimir Putin’s 21 November statement indicate any significant change in Russian strike capabilities or likelihood of using nuclear weapons.

Russia’s 21 November strike on Dnipro marked the first combat use of a nuclear-capable Multiple Independently-targetable Reentry Vehicle (MIRV) ballistic missile carrying conventional warheads, representing a significant escalation by Russia in the Russo-Ukrainian War.

Russian forces conducted a complex strike against critical infrastructure and industrial enterprises in Dnipro City, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, on the morning of 21 November. The attack included a Kh-47M2 Kinzhal ballistic missile fired from Tambov Oblast, seven Kh-101 cruise missiles launched from Volgograd Oblast, and an experimental medium-range ballistic missile with reentry vehicles – likely a modified RS-26 “Rubezh” intermediate-range ballistic missile – fired from Astrakhan Oblast.

Ukrainian forces reportedly downed six Kh-101 cruise missiles, with the remaining missiles causing no significant damage. The strike damaged an unspecified industrial enterprise – ISW notes it’s likely Ukraine’s Pivdenmash factory that manufactures missiles and space rockets, a medical facility, and residential areas in Dnipro City, as well as residential areas in Kryvyi Rih, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast.

CNN: Russia breaks Cold War deterrence doctrine with multiple warhead missile strike on Dnipro

ISW cites Western officials who indicated that the ballistic missile targeting Dnipro City was not an intercontinental ballistic missile but more likely a shorter-range ballistic missile.

The think tank says that Putin gave an address on the evening of 21 November, claiming Russian forces conducted a combined missile strike against Dnipro City, including with a new “Oreshnik” non-nuclear ballistic missile. ISW notes that Putin framed the strike as a direct response to recent Ukrainian ATACMS and Storm Shadow strikes against military objects in Russia and alleged “aggressive actions” of NATO states against Russia.

However, ISW emphasizes that Russian forces routinely fire nuclear-capable Iskander ballistic missiles, Kinzhal hypersonic ballistic missiles, and nuclear-capable Kh-101 cruise missiles against Ukraine. The institute points out that previous Russian missile strikes have targeted industrial and critical infrastructure in Dnipro City that caused greater damage.

According to ISW’s assessment, the only fundamentally new characteristic of the Russian strikes against Dnipro City on 21 November was the Oreshnik missile itself, which ostentatiously showcased reentry vehicles to amplify the spectacle of the strike and further imply a nuclear threat.

Neither the Oreshnik ballistic missile strike nor Putin’s November 21 statement represent a significant inflection in Russian strike capabilities or likeliness to use a nuclear weapon,” ISW wrote.

ISW cites US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Director Bill Burns, who in September 2024 cautioned Western policymakers against fearing Putin’s nuclear rhetoric, describing Putin as a “bully” who will “continue to saber rattle from time to time.”

Related:

You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here



    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!

    Related Posts