Copyright © 2021

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

UEFA’s Russian U-Turn shows public pressure works

Faced with a chorus of dissent, UEFA’s backpedaling on its Russian U-17 decision underscores the potency of united opposition.
LVIV, UKRAINE – NOVEMBER 14, 2015 Ukrainian supporters show their support during UEFA EURO 2016 Play-off for Final Tournament game between Ukraine and Slovenia at Lviv Arena. Credit: Credit: Depositphotos
UEFA’s Russian U-Turn shows public pressure works

On 26 September, the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) announced that it would readmit children’s teams from Russia into its competitions. The announcement came 21 months after the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, when FIFA and UEFA stated that Russia would be suspended from all international competitions.

In UEFA’s 26 September announcement, the organization stated that it “was the first sports body to react to the war in Ukraine,” where it “took decisive action in February 2022 – suspending all Russian teams from its competitions.” European football’s governing body, however, then stated it was “also aware that children should not be punished for actions whose responsibility lies exclusively with adults.”

FIFA then made a similar statement. In its announcement on 4 October, the governing body of international football announced that it would partially lift “its ban on Russian teams competing in international play, allowing under-17 boys and girls teams to compete without openly representing their country.”

UEFA’s statement was quickly condemned. In its own announcement, the Ukrainian Association of Football said it would boycott all UEFA competitions that included Russia. Numerous European football organizations said they also opposed UEFA’s decisions. In a matter of days, football governing bodies from Ukraine, England, Poland, Romania, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Finland, Sweden, Norway, Iceland, Denmark, and Ireland stated they would not compete in UEFA competitions where the Russian teams would participate. In other words, one-fourth of UEFA’s member nations said they would boycott future competitions that included Russia.

After receiving this backlash, European football’s governing body decided to backtrack on its decision. On 10 October, UEFA announced that “Russia will not be allowed to take part in qualifying for the Under-17 European Championship.” The boycott had worked.

“Russian football remains isolated, where it belongs,” the Ukrainian Association of Football stated after UEFA’s reversal. The Ukrainians also said that the policy change showed that UEFA was willing to listen to the dissatisfied member nations, and that their voices had been heard by the organization.

The events that unfolded within European football have shown a variety of lessons. First, it showed that numerous countries are still united beyond Ukraine in its fight for survival. Multiple members stated that Russia was still launching its illegal and unnecessary invasion of Ukraine, and that allowing Russian U-17 teams to participate in UEFA competitions would suggest that Russia is being rewarded for its behavior.

Second, some UEFA members were willing to gamble their revenue, opting to pursue a moral ground instead. National teams participating in UEFA competitions, ranging from qualification to the finals, generate millions of euros in revenue. The countries boycotting UEFA’s Russian reversal were willing to risk this financial compensation, choosing a moral group instead. Their gamble worked, and eventually, UEFA sided with the protestors.

Third, the success of the boycott showed that it is important to take a stand when an organization is making a wrong decision. Following UEFA’s announcement, one-fourth of its members stated they would not participate in UEFA competitions as long as Russia was allowed to participate. UEFA then revoked its decision. Should these European countries continue to make a stand, it is likely that FIFA will revert its decision as well. This suggests that these international organizations are willing to listen to their members, and that they value the opinions of their member states. In other words, opinions and voices matter.

Overall, the decision to uphold the suspension of Russian teams competing in UEFA competitions is welcomed. Russia should not be invited back into the European Football Organization until the invasion ends, Ukraine’s 1991 borders are restored, and Ukraine is rebuilt. Inviting Russia to participate in UEFA competitions prior to Ukraine’s restoration will only normalize Russia’s war, and it will present the globe with a false pretense that autocrats may do as they please when invading and killing their neighbors.


You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here

    Related Posts