Copyright © 2024

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Pregnant, tortured, seriously ill: the women devoured by concentration camp of Russian-occupied Donbas

Civilian women illegally detained in Russia-occupied Donbas (from left to right): Oksana Parshyna, Nataliya Statsenko, Olena Zaitseva, Olha Mozolevska
Pregnant, tortured, seriously ill: the women devoured by concentration camp of Russian-occupied Donbas
Article by: Yuliia Rudenko
Edited by: Morgan Foster, Alya Shandra
Today, 295 people are held hostage in Moscow-controlled Donbas, 30 of them are women, Media Initiative For Human Rights reports. Behind these numbers, are individual stories. Innocent people are taken hostage regardless of age, gender and state of health. Human Rights Watch communicated four known cases of arbitrary detention and torture of women in Russia’s marionette “Donetsk people’s republic” (or “DNR.”) They are now experiencing serious health issues. One of the women is in her sixth month of pregnancy. Euromaidan Press now tells their stories.

These women include Oksana Parshyna, a pregnant woman detained on 14 May; Nataliya Statsenko, a doctor with a chronic spine condition requiring urgent medical treatment, taken hostage in July 2019; Olena Zaitseva who suffers severe bleedings from gynaecological problems, arrested in March 2019; and Olha Mozolevska who was tortured and held in isolation for four years until she was transferred to another prison this May.

Do these four cases have anything in common?

The specific details of why these women were detained remain unknown. What is known is that each of these women was arrested on the same fabricated espionage allegations. This is no coincidence.

According to the Russian Code of Criminal Procedure, when “criminal proceedings before a court may result in the disclosure of State or other information,” it is possible to hold a closed trial. And espionage cases fall under this category of hearings. Without the prying eyes of independent journalists, Russian kangaroo courts can easily breach criminal procedure and pressure defendants with the intention to keep them behind bars.

This can be observed in the case of Valentyn Vyhivskyi, a Ukrainian citizen and Euromaidan activist. In 2014 he was seized in Crimea, tortured into issuing a false confession, then wrongfully imprisoned in Russia for the alleged collection and dissemination of information containing Moscow’s state secrets.

Valentyn Vyhivskyi, a Ukrainian political prisoner of the Kremlin, at Euromaidan. Photo: family archives

Another motivation behind charges such as “espionage,” “participation in sabotage resistance” and “state treason” is to libel the defendants (who are ethnic Ukrainians) in the eyes of the society, as most people arrested on these charges uphold pro-Ukrainian views or have families who work in Ukraine’s law enforcement. This is one tactic through which Russian-backed authorities galvanize the support of the population for self-proclaimed republics and stifle opponents.

The same logic is applied in Crimea against indigenous Crimean Tatars, only the charges are different. The bulk of Russia’s repressions in the Crimean peninsula consist of framing the Crimean Tatars, who are ethnic Muslims and who resisted the occupation, as Islamic terrorists.

Russia’s vile attempts to discredit the Crimean Tatars must not be kept silent

These four women’s relatives share what they know of their family members’ detention.

Oksana Parshyna, 35 y. o.

Oksana Parshyna and her son Maksym. Photo shared by Monika Andruszewska

“I love you so much, come back and be with me, I know you can do this. I cannot wait for you any longer… I miss you so much. Even when I am playing at home, I miss you… When will you finally come back?” Oksana Parshyna’s 6-year-old son Maksym records his mom a video message though he does not understand why she does not reply.

He does not know that his mom is held captive by the Russia-controlled “Donetsk People’s Republic” authorities.

Oksana Parshyna is 35. She is an ethnic Polish and comes from Donetsk city. At the onset of the conflict in 2014, her house, located near Donetsk airport, a symbol of the war in Donbas, was completely wiped out in fighting. The situation forced her to flee her home and settle in Mariupol city within the Ukrainian-controlled territory of Donetsk Oblast.

In May 2021, Oksana and her mother set off to Donetsk to visit Oksana’s sister and deal with problems related to maintaining ownership of their property. Due to COVID-19 related restrictions on the border crossing from Ukraine into Russian-occupied territories, the pair elected to travel through Russia.

At the “Marinkova” checkpoint, members of the self-proclaimed “Donetsk People’s Republic” (DNR) detained Oksana with the explanation that they would check her documents and allow her to travel on the next available transport. Her mother continued the trip to Donetsk hoping her daughter would follow. Instead, for the next twenty-four hours, Oksana’s family could not find any information on her whereabouts.

The next day did not bring relief: Oksana’s mother’s home in Donetsk was searched by the DNR security service who seized a computer and religious literature. The family discovered Oksana had been placed under “administrative arrest” for 30 days on alleged “espionage” charges which bore the possibility of a 12-year prison sentence.

But what they could not find out is whether she received any medical care: at the time of her arrest, Oksana was in her tenth week of pregnancy. Now Oksana is held in a temporary detention facility without the possibility to contact her family. Her sister said that the “DNR” so-called authorities denied her requests to visit Oksana in detention.

The availability of legal aid to Parshyna also raises concerns. As Media Initiative for Human Rights reports, a lawyer assigned to Parshyna does nothing but stand by idly. Pashyna’s family have appealed to the Government of Ukraine concerning the issue.

“We very much hoped that officials of the “MGB” [an initialism for a Soviet Ministry of State Security; here in the meaning of “a respective body of the self-proclaimed entity”] would figure out all circumstances, recognise their mistake, and let [Parshyna] go. But this did not happen despite the pregnancy,” said one of Oksana’s relatives.

Nataliya Statsenko, 43 y. o.

Nataliya Statsenko. Photo: Media Initiative for Human Rights

“I will not live to see the next trial,” said 43-year-old seriously ill Nataliya Statsenko to the lawyers in one of the mock hearings of her case.

Nataliya is a dermatologist at a hospital in Makiivka, a city in Donetsk Oblast in eastern Ukraine. Seven years prior to her arbitrary detention on July 10, 2019, by enemy combatants, Statsenko suffered from pain in her neck, back, and legs. She underwent repeated treatment but her condition further deteriorated.

In June 2019, Nataliya was diagnosed with exacerbation of general spinal osteochondrosis with herniated disks and significant dysfunction of static and dynamic functions of the spine. The doctors said she needed surgery, but it was never able to happen because the following month pro-Russian militants detained Statsenko.

Nataliya’s father Oleksandr recalls her arrest:

“On that day Nataliya went to work like always — left home at 7 am, as she had to ride from Donetsk to Makiivka. Around 11 am, the head doctor of the clinic called me and asked, “Oleksandr Borysovych, where is Nataliya?” I said, “What do you mean, she went to work.” And he said again, “She is not at work.” Oleksandr and his wife began to search for their daughter.

Sometime later, it was discovered that Nataliya had been arrested by “The Ministry of State Security” members of the so-called “DNR.” Unidentified personnel and civilian witnesses came to Statsenko’s home to conduct a search to extract her phones and other electronic devices. Nataliya was also present at the search. Two days later, they called to tell Statsenko’s family she had been placed in custody for alleged “pro-Ukrainian activities.” Following the administrative arrest, criminal “espionage” charges were filed against Statsenko.

Nataliya was held in detention in the afore-mentioned Izolyatsia, then transferred to detention facility № 5 in Donetsk.

Izolyatsia is a former art center and now a secret prison within the territory of a military base in Russia-occupied Donetsk (Donbas). Predominantly civilian detainees who end up in Izolyatsia’s eight cells, two punishment boxes, and two basements are held in incommunicado detention, compelled to perform work against their will, and tortured.

Donetsk art center turned into concentration camp: former hostages share their memories

According to Stanislav Asieyev, a journalist covering life in occupied Donbas and a former prisoner of the Kremlin, Nataliya was detained after the “authorities” in Donetsk gained access to his social media accounts. He commented:

“She was thrown in a basement only for communicating with me.

Now this woman is suffering from daunting health issues: she needs spinal surgery.

We have repeatedly raised this matter within TKH [Trilateral Contact Group on Ukraine of representatives from Ukraine, the Russian Federation, and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe established to facilitate a diplomatic resolution to the conflict in the Donbas region in Ukraine], formed a list of 11 people who really need urgent medical treatment, and proposed her release for humanitarian reasons.”

Nataliya has been subjected to psychological pressure, former hostages told her father. He comments on his daughter health state:

“It is difficult to realize that my daughter is held behind bars, has serious health issues and I, her father, cannot help. For two years, I have been figuring out the way to release Nataliya, but to no avail. I am much concerned with her health as I am a doctor myself and am fully aware of the consequences.

While before captivity she suffered from severe back pain and could seek medical aid, while in confinement she does not receive adequate and qualified medical treatment for her conditions.

For two years, my daughter has been compelled to take nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to somehow take away the pain. But one cannot take such drugs for a long period of time as they have side effects — lead to a stomach ulcer, cirrhosis of the liver, hypertonic disease, and thyroid illness. And Nataliya already has such complications. She also had a seizure in the spine and limbs, headaches, and her left foot is paralyzed.”

On 30 August, a court is scheduled to hear Nataliya’s case. Ukraine’s Ombudsman invited a representative of Special Monitoring Mission OSCE to Ukraine to attend the “trial” to monitor violations of Statsenko’s procedural rights.

Olena Zaitseva, late forties

Olena Zaitseva. Photo: Media Initiative for Human Rights

Another hostage suffering from serious chronic health problems is Olena Zaitseva.

According to Ukrainian human rights advocate Tetiana Katrychenko, Olena has experienced recurrent episodes of heavy bleeding, the result of severe gynaecological problems, possibly cancerous in nature, and likely requiring immediate surgery.

Olena Zaitseva was detained in March 2019 in her attempts to prevent the detention of her son by DNR militants. Olena was first placed in the notorious Izolyatsia, then transferred to a prison in Donetsk city, according to one of her relatives.

These claims were reiterated by a former hostage who met Olena while they were in Izolyatsia together. She told Human Rights Watch that when she last saw Zaitseva back in August 2019, Olena looked like she “didn’t have long left.” That is when Zaitseva shared with the woman that her health was deteriorating: she suffered severe pain yet received no medical help.

Depriving detainees of crucial medical care may be equated to torture, as the European Court of Human Rights ruled on numerous occasions. One of them is the case Ilascu and Others v Moldova and Russia (2004) when four detainees were held in a dire prison environment that deteriorated their health but they did not receive adequate medical care. The Court likened such treatment to torture. 

And in the case Jasinskis v. Latvia (2010), the Court ruled that by failing to medically examine the detainee prior to taking him into custody, the state breached the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture standards.

Olha Mozolevska, 35 y. o.

Olha Mozolevska. Photo: Media Initiative for Human Rights

“Olia [short name for “Olha”] disappeared suddenly in mid-October 2017. I don’t know the exact date because my wife was in Donetsk by herself and dropped out of contact around 15 October,” said Olha Mozolevska’s husband Vitaliy.

For more than three years, Olha’s close family have been unaware of her whereabouts.

Olha and Vitaliy come from Avdiivka, Donetsk Oblast. When the conflict started, they moved to Marinka Raion within the Ukrainian-controlled region of Donetsk Oblast. Vitaliy said they fled “where they would shoot less as we had a little son.”

A cook by profession, Olha soon found a new job as a waitress, and later as a manager at a restaurant in Donetsk where she would go for a few weeks and then return home.

Without warning, Olha disappeared from contact and did not pick up her phone for a few days. Olha’s husband, Vitaly, searched exhaustively for his wife until he eventually found that she was being held captive in a basement under a false identity.

Vitaly received calls from Donetsk in which the person on the other end of the phone invited Vitaliy to visit the Russia-occupied city regarding his missing-person report on Olha. However, the caller refused to identify themselves. As the State Security Service of Ukraine told Vitaliy, a manipulative attempt by the “DNR” authorities to coax him and pressure his wife.

According to Ukrainian human rights activists, Olha Mozolevska was held in isolation in Izolyatsia for four years.

First public photos of Russian-run Donetsk concentration camp leaked online

Information about her only became known when former detainees who were released in prisoner exchanges in December 2019 and April 2020 contacted her husband Vitaliy.

One of the Kremlin’s former Ukrainian hostages Oleksandr Tymofieyev identified Olha in a photo as someone he saw during their imprisonment. He told the Media Initiative for Human Rights about forced labour in the prison:

“I was made to perform domestic work on the territory of Izolyatsia… Every time we worked together, around 10-12 men. We removed snow, leaves, dug the ground, and whitewashed trees. Usually, we were watched by a few guards. Several times during work I saw a young woman who worked in the kitchen and canteen for the guards. She is a skinny young woman, 30 years old, blond hair in a ponytail, with an exhausted face. We probably wouldn’t have paid attention to her, [we] worked with our eyes downcast, if not for one of the guards who sometimes shouted so that we did not stare at her when she took out the trash or stood on the kitchen doorstep.”

One of the former prisoners called Oleksandr Tymofieyev to inform him that Olha had never seen a detective nor had she been interrogated. Olha was not even aware of the exact accusations that held her there. Most likely, they concerned “espionage.”

The released prisoners also confirm Olha was subjected to torture with the aim of extracting a false confession. When she refused to “admit to” spying, the security service agent would beat her across her body and face and smash her against the wall. An investigator would walk in and repeatedly ask, “Why is there blood on your face? Did you fall? Now will you tell the truth?” Eventually, Olha “confessed.”

Torture and humiliation: freed Ukrainians talk about Donbas captivity

Vitaliy explained that a few weeks prior he had heard his wife’s voice for the first time in four years when she was taken to another detention facility. She did not disclose any details about her detention and condition, her husband said. And added: “She’d also asked me to save money because she said she would need a lot of medical treatment.”

From 2014 to 2021, around 4,000 detainees (3,400 men and 600 women) were victims of torture and abuse in Russia-occupied Donbas, including 340 victims of sexual violence, the UN reports.


Edited by: Morgan Foster, Alya Shandra
You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here

    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!