Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 was shot down on its way from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur five years ago on 17 July 2014 over the Russia-occupied area of Ukraine’s far-eastern oblast of Donetsk, killing all 298 passengers and crew members on board. As the JIT found earlier, the passenger airliner was shot out of the sky using a Buk-M2 surface-to-air missile (SAM), launched from a self-propelled BUK transporter erector launcher and radar (TELAR) deployed in an agricultural field near the town of Snizhne. The team traced the entire route of the BUK TELAR from a Russian military unit near the city of Kursk to Ukraine’s Donbas region, and the route of its subsequent evacuation back to Russia via Luhansk Oblast after the MH17 crash.
The newly-released intercepts dating back to March-August 2014 are published in JIT’s new witness appeal. The investigators are seeking new witnesses who are able to testify about the military and administrative hierarchy who enabled the shooting down of MH17 and about the role that Russian officials might have had. Each group of the published conversations is concluded by the questions the JIT poses to the potential witnesses.
June charges
Earlier this year, on 19 June, the JIT charged four persons – Russian nationals Igor Girkin, Sergey Dubinsky, Oleg Pulatov, and Ukrainian citizen Leonid Kharchenko – with downing Flight MH17. The court trial will begin on 9 March 2020 and the defendants will be tried in the Netherlands under Dutch law whether they will be present in court or not.
As the Joint Investigation Team stated, “Together [the four suspects] formed a chain linking the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic with the Russian Federation.”
The intercepted phone calls released by the JIT in June showed that “DNR” leaders maintained contact with Russian government officials, in particular, with Russian-appointed leader for occupied Crimea Sergey Aksyonov and Putin’s aide Vladislav Surkov on the issue of Russian military support.
Key findings
The reason for today’s appeal for witnesses is a “recent analysis of witness statements and other information revealed that Russian influence on the DNR went beyond military support and that the ties between Russian officials and DNR-leaders appear closer” [“DNR” is an anglicized acronym for “DNR”] and that “The intensity of Russian influence is relevant to investigating further individuals involved in the downing of MH17,” according to the international investigators of the JIT.
Russia’s military and security control of “DNR”
The intercepted conversations suggest further evidence of Russia’s control over the occupied part of Donetsk Oblast.
Russian citizens Alexandr Borodai and defendant Igor Girkin, “DNR prime minister” and “defense minister” at the moment of downing MH17, publicly stated that they volunteered against Ukraine as private citizens and denied any involvement of Russian officials in the Russia-orchestrated rebellion.
The JIT, however, says that several witnesses who were “DNR” members in summer 2014 stated that “key figures of the [“DNR”] armed group were directed from within the Russian Federation.” Moreover, in one of the intercepted calls dated 3 July 2014, allegedly Borodai himself makes it clear that he executes orders coming from Russia,
“I’m carrying out orders and protecting the interests of one and only state, the Russian Federation. That’s the bottom line,” he says.
In another call, dated 1 July 2014, a DNR-member tells a local commander that “men are coming with a mandate from Shoygu” to “kick the local warlords out of the units,” and “people from Moscow” are going to take over the command. Sergey Shoygu is the defense minister of Russia and the information is aligned with subsequent assassinations, expulsions, or just suspending from command of most pro-Russian warlords in Luhansk and Donetsk oblasts.
Read also:
- Alleged “military coup” followed by purge of “LNR” chieftains (2016)
- Mysterious deaths of chieftains in Russian-backed “republics” since 2015 in a nutshell – #Infographic (2017)
- New footage shows Russian PMC Wagner involved in crucial 2015 Debaltseve battle in Ukraine
In the 18 July conversation, two “DNR” members admit that they both receive orders from Moscow, but one of them from the FSB security agency, and the other from the GRU military intelligence agency.
The JIT says that several former “DNR” members gave their testimonies about Russia’s military influence. For example, a “senior member” said that local warlords “discussed military matters with representatives of the Russian intelligence services in Moscow.”
Numerous calls intercepted in July 2014 when “DNR” was engaged in heavy fighting with Ukrainian forces shows the involvement of a not yet known person mentioned and addressed as “Vladimir Ivanovich” in overseeing military activities in the Donbas. In one of the conversations, he is referred to as a “higher-ranking boss” “who flew over from Moscow.” In the conversation dated 31 July 2014, “DNR defense minister” Girkin says that “Vladimir Ivanovich” gives orders to him, however, he himself commands his people.
One of the conversations shows the role of the commander of Russia’s Southern Military District, General Serdyukov in delivering the military equipment for a mission, which was coordinated, as other conversations show, by Aksyonov with FSB director Bortnikov.
Surkov’s control of the occupation administration
In an August 2014 interview, “DNR defense minister” Girkin apparently admits that on Surkov’s direction he was ordered to transfer command to another warlord, Alexandr Zakharchenko,
“I was ordered to transfer command to Zakharchenko. […Q: And why do you think that he was chosen?] Well, I don’t know, he and Borodai went to meet with Surkov. And apparently he was chosen, that is for the formal head of command. And why and how this happened… Surkov’s choices are always shit,” told Girkin.
Vladislav Surkov is Putin’s aide who oversees the political and economic issues of the Russia-occupied areas in Georgia and Ukraine.
In the intercepted call of 3 July 2014, Surkov encourages “DNR PM” to appoint Vladimir Antyufeyev he sends in place of Alexander Khodakovsky as “head of the GB [‘gosbezopasnost’ – ‘state security’].” A week later at his press conference with Girkin and Borodai in Donetsk, Antyufeyev tells that he arrived from Russia to take the “state security, home affairs, and justice of the DNR” under his responsibility.
One of Surkov’s leaked emails had an attached list of candidates for the “DNR government.” Not all candidates from the list got their appointments and a wiretapped conversation between Borodai’s assistant and current “DNR head” Denis Pushilin shows that “government” appointments required Moscow’s approval.
-
Read also: The Surkov Leaks: Major report on Russia’s hybrid war in Ukraine published at RUSI Institute
The record is dated 15 May 2014 – the day when Pushilin became head of “DNR’s” fake parliament. Borodai’s aide tells Pushilin that “Moscow approved the closed list” but one of DNR leaders, Andrei Purgin, proposed for the “DNR security council,” was excluded from the list.
Russian funding
The JIT reports,
“Various sources, including witness statements, indicate that the self-proclaimed DNR government was financed by Russian beneficiaries. According to a high ranking DNR-member, nearly the entire DNR budget was paid by Russian funds.”
In a phone conversation recorded on 12 July 2014, “DNR PM” Borodai discusses money issues and mentions that he’s running out of money spending his funds to warlords and that someone named “Kolya” had promised him “180,000,” however, the money was still in Moscow requiring confirmation for payment.
Read more:
- Ukrainian court releases alleged MH17 accomplice Tsemakh on recognizance
- JIT charges four suspects over downing MH17, Bellingcat identifies eight more
- Flight MH17: Why can’t the Kremlin tell the truth?
- Novaya Gazeta identifies Russian colonel involved in shooting down MH17
- The most comprehensive guide ever to MH17 conspiracies
- Russian media forge more papers to blame Ukraine of downing MH17, make bad grammar mistakes
- Why did Russia close its airspace near Donbas one day before flight MH17 was downed?
- Four years on, Russian MH17 disinformation campaign still going strong
- MH-17 flight downed 3 years ago. How much do we know now?
- Flight MH17 three years on: getting the truth out of Eastern Ukraine
- Russia planned to shoot down Aeroflot plane to justify invasion — SBU
- Ukrainian dep’t at Russian troll factory exploded after MH17 crash: analysis of 750,000 tweets
- Ukraine had no reason to close its airspace above 10 000 m before MH17 disaster | Infographic
- SBU: Wiretap proves terrorists possessed ‘Buk’ missile launcher
- Breaking News:Malaysian plane crashes on Ukraine-Russia border (2014)
