Copyright © 2024

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

84% of Ukrainians believe in populist economic fairy tales

Image: Ukrinform
84% of Ukrainians believe in populist economic fairy tales
Edited by: Alya Shandra
Sociologists from the Center for Economic strategy revealed that a tremendous number of Ukrainians support unrealistic populist economic policies in Ukraine. They questioned 2000 Ukrainians about their support for policies ranging from a sixfold hike in minimum salaries to state-regulated prices for food and medicines and found that not only 84% of Ukrainians believe that populistic measures will not only be good for their wellbeing, but 59% think it’s possible to implement them in the first place.

Researchers from the Center for Economic strategy selected eight populist reforms from the programs of presidential candidates. All eight policies that were examined fall under the common framework of socialist or left-wing policies, the implementation of which is unrealistic under Ukraine’s current conditions. They can seem like a simple solution to a complicated problem but can carry great long-term negative consequences. They include:

  • introducing state regulation of prices for medicine and food – a potentially harmful measure, as artificial depression of prices for products below market levels will eventually lead to their deficit and deterioration of quality;
  • a twofold reduction of gas prices, which were for years subsidized by the state and raised from their ridiculously low position to market levels only after the Euromaidan Revolution upon the demand of the IMF;
  • using gas extracted in Ukraine for the needs of the population – an unrealistic promise, as the volume of gas extracted by state companies is insufficient for covering Ukraine’s needs, and the state can’t force private companies to sell gas to citizens at low prices;
  • a $1000 minimum wage, a far cry from the current $167, which will lead to the growth of a shadow economy and unemployment, a three-fold rise in the minimum pension, which will lead to a budget deficit and will lead to inflation, as well as establishing a top limit for salaries, which will negatively impact labor incentives and, consequently, limit economic growth;
  • state-guaranteed employment for all citizens, which is impossible to achieve as the state can’t force private businesses to have more employees. The only way this promise can be met is by expanding the number of workplaces in the state sector, but this requires state expenditures Ukraine cannot meet;
  • rolling back the IMF-prodded decision to gradually increase the retirement age from 55 to 60 for women and from 60 to 60-65 for men. The step was needed because Ukraine, with one of the lowest retirement ages in Europe but low birthrates, is struggling to support its army of pensioners.

While these labor demands are part and parcel of the democratic debate in many countries, Ukraine’s economy simply cannot cover such demands, as anybody with a fleeting understanding of the country’s financial situation and the market economy understands.

The results of the poll are more striking when we consider the electoral choices such voters make in the democracy which is Ukraine. On average, 84% of respondents consider populist policies positive for their personal wellbeing while 59% think that they are also realistic. What is most shocking, 52% of Ukrainians think that all 8 policies are positive and only 1% support none of them.

How to persuade people of the opposite?

Speaking in brief, it’s not that easy. Yet, experts from the Center for Economic Strategy asked several more questions and found out that much fewer respondents (54% instead of 84%) favor a populist policy if they should choose among two alternatives rather than say whether they support a particular policy or not. Therefore, it was concluded that it’s better to explain the available alternatives to populist policies and what positive consequences they bear, rather than to say only about the negative effects of one populist policy.

Another recommendation confirmed by the research is to explain from a personal, egoistic point of view. Much fewer people choose to lower the pension age if they are rationally informed about the amount of their pension, that will be lowered proportionately to the pension age and vice versa.

Edited by: Alya Shandra
You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here

    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!

    Related Posts