Copyright © 2021 Euromaidanpress.com

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Rebecca Harms: Germany and France should stop supporting Russia’s unconditional return to PACE

Rebecca Harms in the EU Parliament on 14.02.2017, urging to strengthen sanctions against Russia because of its aggression in Eastern Ukraine. Photo: screenshot from video
Article by: Rebecca Harms

A few days ago, the International Maritime Tribunal in Hamburg ruled in favor of the Ukrainian lawsuit and ruled that Russia must immediately release 24 sailors who had been captured on three Ukrainian Navy ships last year following an attack by the Russian Coast Guard. The 24 Ukrainians have since then been in Russian jail. Russia has not participated in the trial in Hamburg. The Russian leadership tried to ignore the tribunal. The Ukrainian side received applause from all over the world for its success in court. The applause was especially meant for (and rightly so) the work of Deputy Foreign Minister Olena Zerkal. Now rumors say that Russia is preparing to release the Ukrainian sailors. That would be a great pleasure and relief. But that would also show how important the international solidarity campaign and the International Maritime Law Tribunal were for the captured sailors.

The applause for the work of the Ukrainian plaintiff in court in Hamburg was met eagerly in Ukraine. Beyond this applause, the international community must finally do more to strengthen Ukraine’s rights and position in the face of Putin’s aggressive policies.

The attack in the Kerch Strait was one of the many terrifying signs of the ongoing Russian escalation in Ukraine. And it was a renewed Russian test for international solidarity with Ukraine, a country which is since 2014 partially occupied by the nuclear power Russia, against which Russia is waging war because Ukraine wanted and got an association agreement with the European Union.

I use the Hamburg judge’s ruling as an opportunity to repeat what I have already said on 13 May in Brussels at the Foreign Affairs Council, where we took stock of the 10 years of Eastern Partnership. Despite many problems of social and economic transformation in the countries associated with the European Union, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine, there is also a lot of progress.

We also have experienced a breath-taking democratic awakening in Armenia. In recent elections, it has become clear in several of these countries that citizens there clearly rely on EU support for developing democracy and the rule of law.

As different as the processes in the individual countries may be, almost all of them have a very large and so far unsolvable challenge in common. Almost all of our eastern partner countries are affected by Putin’s aggressive course, albeit to varying degrees.

None of our partner countries will be able, with solely their own resources, to overcome Russian aggression or the occupation or control of entire parts of the country. As reasonable as the West’s response to the beginning of the Russian occupation and the war against Ukraine was – to seek no military solution, but rely on sanctions and diplomacy – as weak this concept is currently perceived by the Ukrainians. The attack on naval ships and the Russian “gunboat diplomacy” in the Sea of Azov and Putin’s new order to distribute Russian passports in the Donbas show that Russia is simply continuing its aggression and violating international law and treaties. Putin obviously feels encouraged by Germany’s continued support for Nord Stream.

The simultaneous support of many western states, led by Germany and France for an unconditional return of Russia to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, will not bring him to give in. Why should Putin see a reason to back down when Old Europe and Germany keep on approaching the Russian President, ignoring and overruling Central and Eastern European states? On the contrary, this is exactly the division of the EU that Putin wants. I fully agree with former Foreign Minister Klimkin, who stated at the Council meeting in Brussels that the Minsk Agreements are dead if even after the decree on the distribution of Russian passports and its gunboat diplomacy in the Sea of Azov Russia will unconditionally return to the Council of Europe.

The verdict from Hamburg on the release of the sailors should be an occasion to clarify conditions for the return of the Duma delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. Of course, I understand the urge of Russian civil society to continue to be able to appeal to the Human Rights Court in Strasbourg. But as long as Russia remains a member of the Council of Europe, this will be the case.

Those in Russia who need the Strasbourg court should be particularly interested in obliging the Russian government to respect the decisions of international courts and institutions.

Germany and France should stop supporting the unconditional return of the Russian delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. Together with the other EU member states, they should oblige the Russian Government to end the blockade of the Kerch Strait. They must reach the release of the Azov sailors and all Ukrainians unlawfully imprisoned in Russia, in occupied Crimea and in the parts in Eastern Ukraine controlled by Russia. The decree for the distribution of Russian passports in Ukraine must be withdrawn.

Moreover, there must be a new start for the withdrawal of Russian weapons and soldiers from Ukraine. It must be made clear that the occupation of Crimea is illegal and the sanctions remain in force until the occupation ends. Germany and France must not ignore the Minsk Agreements, for which people like to praise themselves in Paris and Berlin and overlook blatant breaches for the sake of their business interests. They have to do more to enforce the Minsk Agreements. This includes setting conditions for Russia’s return to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. They would be doing something for peace and justice in Ukraine and beyond. And they would do something against the rift between East and West in the European Union.

Rebecca Harms is a German politician and former Member of the European Parliament (MEP) from Germany. She is a member of the Alliance ’90/The Greens, part of the European Green Party. From 2010 till 2016, she has been the president of The Greens–European Free Alliance group in the European Parliament. During 2017-2019, she was the chairwoman of the delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly, which deals with relations with Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine.

Read more:

You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!
Total
0
Shares
Related Posts