Even though Russian officials and commentators have felt free to call Ukraine and Ukrainians other names, the suggestion by Ukrainian writer Larysa Nitsoi that Russia should be called Muscovy has sparked outrage among Russians – even though Muscovy is a more historical term for what is now Russia than many terms Russians now use for Ukraine.
![Ukrainian writer Larysa Nitsoi (Image: culturemeter.od.ua)](http://euromaidanpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Larysa-Nitsoi-300x244.jpg)
Residents of Ukraine should “apply to the Russian Federation the historical name ‘Muscovy since the term ‘Rus’ was stolen from the Ukrainians by the Russians,” Ukrainian writer Larysa Nitsoi says. Moreover, she continues, the tsars had to impose the name Russia on reluctant Muscovites.
“Do you know how they became Russians?” she asks rhetorically. The Russian tsars first stole the name ‘Rus’ from us. They were at the time Muscovites. Rus is ours. It’s as if someone stole the house of your parents and then you say that the owners are those who did the stealing,” Nitsoi continues.
People in Ukraine are in fact “’Russians,’” she tells an interviewer. “You and I are Russians; they are Muscovites. The Muscovite tsardom by order of Peter I called itself Rus. Just imagine if Germany woke up today, and France had issued an order specifying that we now are Germany. This is the same nonsense!”
![XVII-century view of Moscow Kremlin from the West. (Source: "Drawings of Muscovy from The Mayerberg Album." In February 1661, the Holy Roman Emperor sent to Muscovy an embassy headed by Baron Augustin von Mayerberg and Horatio Gugliemo Clavuccio. They arrived in Moscow May 25, 1661, and departed May 5, 1662.)](http://euromaidanpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/mayerb41.jpg)
Indeed, Nitsoi recalls, “the Muscovites continued to call themselves Muscovites,” forcing Catherine II to issue a decree – all Muscovites who call themselves Muscovites will be piteously beaten. This is a historic fact; it can be confirmed in museums! As a result, the Muscovites were called and forced to call themselves Russians.”
Few things anger those who call themselves Russians now than anyone who calls attention to some of the problematic aspects of their history, their names or the name of their language. And not surprisingly, Nitsoi’s remarks sparked an immediate and universally negative response in the Russian Federation.
For a sample of these reactions by politicians and commentators, see among many others regnum.ru, ura.news and velykoross.ru.
Read More:
- Ukrainian conflict is between ‘heirs of Kyivan Rus’ and ‘heirs of Golden Horde’
- How Moscow hijacked the history of Kyivan Rus
- Forgotten history: What tour guides at Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra aren’t saying…
- Tatar historian: ‘Russians are no more European than are the Tatars’
- Why there are Muslim crescents on Orthodox crosses in Moscow but not in Kyiv
- Russian journalist Valeriy Solovey: What Russians don’t like about Ukrainians
- The life and death of people in medieval Ukraine, told by a paleoanthropologist
- Inozemtsev: Russian Empire’s special features haven’t disappeared in Russia today
- “Malorossiya”: yet another Russian imperial myth salvaged from the garbage dump of history
- Only ‘de-Muscovization’ can save Russia from disaster, Eidman says
- Ukrainian parliament mulls requiring officials to call the Russian state ‘Muscovy’
- Rename Russia “Muscovy”, some Ukrainians say