Boston activists holding war boosters accountable for using their art to support Putin’s aggression

Spivakov-protest-Putin-Natasha.JPG
At the protest against Spivakov and Gerzmava on 2.06.2017 in Boston. Photo: Arts Against Aggression
Boston activists holding war boosters accountable for using their art to support Putin’s aggression
How tall is Putin? In Boston that depends on who’s wearing the costume. Since the fall of 2016, Arts Against Aggression have frequently included a participant dressed in a Putin costume in our protests. Thus, in October, while greeting pianist and Putin’s emissary Denis Matsuev with an installation entitled “Putin and Matsuev’s House of Horrors,” our Putin was appreciably taller than the actual President of Russian Federation. His presence unnerved some of the concertgoers, who wanted us to allow Mr. Matsuev to keep his music and his politics separate. Our response then, as now, is that when an artist chooses to use the reputation they built through their art to support a policy that results in a war that kills, maims, and displaces millions of people, through this political act the artist inextricably links their art to politics, and their art itself then supports war and aggression. On Friday, June 2nd, Arts Against Aggression organized a protest
to greet the performance at Emerson College’s Cutler Majestic Theatre by two other supporters of Mr. Putin’s war, Vladimir Spivakov and Hibla Gerzmava. The installation “Putin—Conductor of War” played a prominent part in our protest. This time, our Putin was much closer to the original’s height and build, though ours displayed far superior manners and sense of humor. Like Mr. Matsuev, Mr. Spivakov and Ms. Gerzmava signed the infamous letter in support of the policies of the President of Russian Federation related to Crimea and Ukraine (an English translation of the letter, along with the names of all the signatories can be found at http://russianartists4war.com/letter/). Like Mr. Matsuev, neither has ever expressed any regrets for allowing their names, and thus their artistic reputations, to be put to work promoting a war of aggression. In fact, in an interview with Rossiyskaya Gazeta, Mr. Spivakov explicitly stated that he does not regret signing the letter. Friday’s installation aimed to provide a rough outline of the consequences to date of the war these artists support. The installation consisted of six mannequins, representing the victims of Russia’s war in Ukraine. Four mannequins held signs summarizing the statistics on the number of dead, wounded, and displaced by the war, in the context of some of the painful images of the war. Some of these images are fairly well-known, such as the images of the debris of flight MH17 that was brought out of the sky by a Russian BUK missile, killing all 298 on board. Other images are far less known though no less devastating. Remaining two mannequins held portraits of the artists who with their signatures consigned themselves to the status of war boosters—Mr. Spivakov (#404) and Ms. Gerzmava (#98). Spivakov-installation.JPG Our protest on Friday was multigenerational— parents brought their children, and children brought their parents. The oldest participant was 89 years old. Folk musician Natasha Dukach emphasized the tremendous human tragedy of Putin’s war with her performance of a number of traditional Ukrainian folk melodies arranged in the style of violin concertos. Pieces such as “Dear Mother of Mine” contrast the false pretenses under which this war was started by the Russian government and the cost of the war in lives, extinguished or irreversibly altered. Spivakov-protest-oldest.JPG Some two dozen protest participants handed out flyers recounting the basic facts of Mr. Spivakov’s and Ms. Gerzmava’s support for the war and asking Emerson College and Arts Emerson—organizations that administer Cutler Majestic’s venerable stage,-- to acknowledge that renting space to Pr. Putin’s puppet artists does not reflect their values and to pledge that it will not happen in the future. We also handed out printed our copies of the Boston Globe article previewing our protest. Spivakov-protest-group.JPG It is our hope that the protest and the article raised awareness among the Boston arts community of the way in which Mr. Putin’s hybrid war against the West includes a cultural front. We also want to call attention to the fact that it is specifically artists that support the Kremlin regime who are then supported by the regime in their overseas tours. In the case of Mr. Spivakov, this tour was organized by Cherry Orchard Festival, a nonprofit organization closely related to a for-profit company called Maestro Artists Management, and counting among its sponsors NTV America, a TV channel with close ties to Kremlin and Gazprom, Russian state oil company. Interestingly, the advisory board of the nonprofit closely resembles the roster of artists it has recently brought to the US—Mr. Matsuev, Mr. Spivakov, and Ms. Gerzmava all serve on the board. Finally, we would like to emphasize that declining to rent space to Mr. Putin’s puppet artists is an act of self-preservation for any institution concerned with its reputation. As illustrated by the annotated picture of the poster for Mr. Spivakov and Ms. Gerzmava’s concert, these particular artists engaged in unabashed fraud by using a fake quote from the New York Times. And because the fake quote appeared on the Arts Emerson website, as well as on flyers that ushers at the Majestic handed out to attendees at other performances at the venue and on the poster that spent at least a week on the façade of the Theatre (real estate it shared with the Cutler Majestic’s logo), these artists made Arts Emerson complicit in the fraud that they committed. So it appears that quite aside from not wanting to aid and abet Mr. Putin in his assault on the West, not engaging in dealings with Mr. Putin’s puppets is simply good ethics hygiene. Spivakov-Majestic-poster-annotated.png Read more:

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here



    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!

    Related Posts

    January 16th: Donetsk Airport is site of ferocious fighting

    January 16 – 6 Ukrainian military were killed and 18 wounded in the ATO area in the last 24 hours, – informed NSDC spokesman Andriy Lysenko.

    January 16 – Ukrainian Parliament will attempt to abolish parliamentary and judicial immunity today, – said the Speaker Volodymyr Groysman.

    January 16 – Ukraine has recovered UAH 3.7 billion (cash) from the vaults of the National Bank of Ukraine, earlier seized from the annexed Crimea – President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko.

    January 16 – Global markets expect that Ukraine might default, but the government can still avoid such a scenario, – stated American financier and philanthropist George Soros during a meeting with reporters in Kyiv. The West – both the EU and the US – do not fully understand how significant the possibility of a default really is – emphasized the financier.

    January 16 – Former members of Ukrainian parliament Mykola Levchenko and Vadim Kolesnichenko (Party of Regions) were declared wanted on the charges of calls for separatism and breakup of Ukraine.

    January 16 – An attack on Donetsk airport begat at 8 am. The fighting continued throughout the day; the militants used tear-gas. The situation is fairly complicated, but overall under control. Ukrainian military are well supported by protective fire. If it weren't for protective fire, the terrorists would have gained an upper hand long ago. Those who are currently defending the site of Donetsk airport are able to carry out their duty as a result of such powerful protective fire. Airport is a site of most fierce opposition. According to journalist Andriy Tsaplienko, Ukrainian military blew up Russian mercenaries (Chechens and also Kadyrov supporters) who made their way into the basement of the airport a few days ago.

    January 16 -Russian terrorist fighters in the ATO zone are continuing to assemble heavy army supplies – RNBO spokesperson Andriy Lysenko: "During the last few days we are observing the assemblance of for fighters close to the demarcation of the border. Especially in the city there is a whole row of tanks that have stretched out over approximately 3 kilometers and moved in the direction of the positions of the Ukrainian sub-units," reported Lysenko.

    January 16 – U.S. Ambassadaor Jeffrey Payett stated that the attacks of the fighters on the Donetsk Airport is a violation of the Minsk agreement.

    January 16 – In the city of Kurakhiv in the Donetsk region, Security Forces detained a fighter of the diverse group, the so-called " DNR". Among the many crimes committed by the terrorist whose surname is "Tserber", is the murder of two peaceful citizens. The so-called "intelligence gatherers" actively terrified local residents, treathening them with physical harm. From words, they moved on to action, killed two two peaceful citizens – a man and a woman, and took over their automobile. While escaping the scene of the crime, the terrorists wounded a member of the street police of Ukraine.

    January 16 – Turkey is interested that Ukraine remains the transitioner of the Russian gas to the European Union. This was stated in Brussells by the Prime miister of Turkey, Akhmet Davutohlu in commenting on Russian plans to transport the gas through the territory of Turkey into Europe. In 2014, the transporting of Russian gas through Ukraine's territory, compared to the previous year, decreased by 28%. Davutohlu also noted that Turkey has good relations and a high level of cooperation with Ukraine as welll aswith Russia. However, the relations with Kyiv are solely based on the principles of the territorial integrity of the country.

    The director of NAK "Gas of Ukraine" Andriy Koboliev called the statement of Hazprom regarding the "Turkish Stream" a political bluff. Statements by Hazprom that the company is ready to curtail the relationship which has existed for many years with the EU, lack any economic sense at all and are a political bluff," stated Koboliev. The enterprise stated that Naftogaz is adhering to all agreements made in Brussells which are geared towards preserving the stability of the delivery of Russian gas to the countries of EU.

    Interview with Myroslava Gongadze, Ukrainian journalist

    One marine's story about the fall of Crimea

    NATO sends rapid-reaction forces to Russia's neighbors

    P.S.: Please spread this appeal as much as possible.