Copyright © 2024

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Russian poetess: Evil and cruelty deified not condemned in Russia today

Olga Sedakova, Russian poetess (Image: / Dmitri Brushko)
Olga Sedakova, Russian poetess (Image: / Dmitri Brushko)
Russian poetess: Evil and cruelty deified not condemned in Russia today
Edited by: A. N.

In Russia today, the state by celebrating some of the most odious figures in the Russian past is promoting “the deification of evil and cruelty,” Olga Sedakova says. And such celebration of an evil past together with a desire to return to it is one of the things Vladimir Putin and the far right in the West share, according to Vitaly Portnikov.

The distinguished Russian Orthodox poetess was the first guest of Belarusian Nobelist Svetlana Aleksievich at her new intellectual club in Minsk on December 7. Sedakova devoted her presentation to “’Evil’ and Attitudes toward It in the Russian and European Traditions.

Sedakova says: “The historical role of Russia, is as a country of suffering.” The same is true with Belarus. This suffering was “extraordinary” but “it didn’t fall from the sky” or emerge as “a natural misfortune.” Instead, she argues, it was something human actions were responsible for.

In short, she continues, “someone did something in order that people have suffered.” But Russia stands out not so much because of the amount of suffering its people have undergone but because Western countries do not “associate themselves with the theme of suffering.” In Russia, however, this has “always” been the case.

Adding to this problem, Sedakova argues, is that Russians have never developed a good attitude to themselves as a group. They have not developed an ethics of “humanitarian solidarity” which promotes respect for others. Instead, they have developed “an ethic of war, and there is no understanding of peace.”

Joseph Brodsky translated the expression “’there is no bad without good’ as ‘there is no evil within which there isn’t at least a portion of good.’” That is “a characteristic Russian understanding of things.” Russians typically do not say that “inside evil there is something good.” Instead, they insist that some people do evil so that something good will come of it.

That has the effect of blocking criticism of evil and reflects the fact that while in European culture, there has always been “a precise distinction” between good and evil,” in Russian culture, there has been an insistence that the two are intertwined in ways that make pulling them apart impossible.

One manifestation of that – and Sedakova gives several – is the tendency of Russians to speak “’on the one hand, but on the other hand.’”

Thus, Russians say, “’Stalin destroyed millions of people but on the other hand, he industrialized the country.” One can’t imagine present-day Italians saying that about Mussolini or present-day Germans saying that about Hitler.

Another is the tendency to raise monuments to odious figures like Stalin and Ivan the Terrible. That could happen only in Russia, Sedakova says; and reflects “the deification of evil and cruelty” and their elevation over good and use to suppress any criticism of the state no matter how horrific its acts. 

She concludes: “The Soviet past deprived Russians of [the capacity for] repentance. They weren’t taught this,” and one of the consequences of that is the sense that they are always right and that no one has anything to teach them about either the past or the future.

Meanwhile, Ukrainian commentator Vitaly Portnikov suggests, in the course of an analysis of the far right in the West that it shares with the Putin regime a desire to insist that its predecessors did nothing wrong in the past and that the past is a place to which its supporters want to return.

To the extent that Sedakova and Portnikov are right, it may be fair to say that Putin’s ‘Russian world’ truly has achieved a victory over a significant portion of the population in Western societies. But it is a victory that promises not good but a return of evils in a new and perhaps “hybrid” and hyperbolic form.


Edited by: A. N.
You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here

    Will the West continue to support Ukraine?
    • Know what moves the world.
    • Premium journalism from across Europe.
    • Tailored to your needs, translated into English.
    Special discount
    for Euromaidan Press readers
    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!