Copyright © 2021

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.


Moscow commentator: A Transdniestria-2 in the Donbas wouldn’t be a Russian victory

Some of the devastation in the Donbas caused by the Russian military aggression: ruins of the Donetsk airport.
Some of the devastation in the Donbas caused by the Russian military aggression: ruins of the Donetsk airport.
Edited by: A. N.

Vladimir Mamontov, head of the Moscow Speaks radio station, says that the creation of a Transdniestria-like entity in eastern Ukraine “should not be considered a victory” for Russia, a statement that has at least three possible meanings, none of which should be ignored.

First of all, Mamontov’s words could be what they purport to be, an argument for going further and annexing the Donbas as Moscow has already annexed the Crimea. Second, they could represent a warning to Putin that he should not underestimate Russian support for doing just that and pull back in any way.

Or, third — and most intriguingly – Mamontov’s comment may be intended to provide Putin with exactly the kind of argument he needs at home and abroad to organize a Transdniestria-2 in Ukraine by suggesting to Russians that this is what is possible now and to Western leaders that such an arrangement would be a compromise rather than “a victory.”

Arranging something like a Transdniestria in eastern Ukraine is “one of the variants of the development of the situation,” he says, and “not a bad one in fact if it is peaceful.” But that isn’t the case at present because of Kyiv’s actions. And consequently, a Ukrainian Transdniestria could find itself subject to a blockade.

“If we get such a blockaded variant of Donetsk and Luhansk,” Mamontov says, “then it seems to [him] that this must not be considered a victory.” These regions could remain within “a federal Ukraine, of course, “but that Ukraine must be different” than the current one, “politically, economically and legally.”

Edited by: A. N.
You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!
Related Posts