Copyright © 2024

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Yanukovych’s representative said that a forceful scenario is not considered

Yanukovych’s representative said that a forceful scenario is not considered
Article by: Yuriy Lukanov
Translated by: Christine Chraibi
Edited by: A. N.

The President’s representative in the Verkhovna Rada (Parliament) Yuriy Miroshnichenko alleged that resolving the political crisis Ukraine within a forceful scenario is not considered. He stated this during a broadcast of the “Freedom of speech” program at ICTV.

“By the way, the President said at our meeting (with the Party of Regions fraction): “We have real opportunities to clear the administrative buildings and even Maidan in a forceful manner”. But he also said: “I would never let this happen because they are also our citizens”…” – the MP cited Yanukovych. “That’s why the forceful scenario is not considered,” – Miroshnichenko pointed out.

“We talked too much last week, and the week before, about an emergency state. It will not be introduced,” – he emphasized. “The President said: “If politicians cannot make arrangements, reach a common decision and fulfill it, then we have only one democratic way of solving this situation and that is pre-term elections (for changing the Constitution, pre-term parliamentary and presidential elections),” – stated Miroshnichenko. “And he (Yanukovych) said: “You will go to the pre-term elections and I will go to the pre-term elections”.

Earlier, the Verkhovna Rada had adopted the bill for amnesty of protesters of Yuriy Miroshnichenko’s preparation. 232 MPs gave their votes for it. The Svoboda leader Oleh Tyahnybok stated that the voting was passed with violation of the regulations and that Maidan would not abide by this law. At the same time MP Inna Bogoslovska considered that the amnesty law was passed so that “the authorities got a chance to rest, regroup their forces, and execute the forceful scenario”.


Translated by Anatoliy Shara

Edited by Alya Shandra

Translated by: Christine Chraibi
Edited by: A. N.
You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here

    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!

    Related Posts