Protests in Moscow. Photo: Livejournal
The last frontier
Of course, the behavior of the protesters themselves is understandable. As calculated by Russian authorities, blocking independent candidates from taking part in the Moscow City Duma elections was such an insignificant event that it would not generate a serious protest wave. However, for the Russians, it became not just an ordinary case of injustice, but a symbol of radical change in the rules of the game, which the Russians were no longer willing to tolerate.
On the one hand, a “change of rules” is an almost permanent state of Russia since at least 2014. It was then, against the backdrop of the military mobilization of the entire society, that the flywheel of repressions against the most ordinary people – saleswomen, housewives, users of social networks, participants in single pickets, etc. – was launched. Since then, the scope of “stability” and “normal life” that the Russian majority had become accustomed to has been steadily narrowed, and new waves of restrictions of rights began affecting not only open opposition, but truckers, religious minorities, Moscow residents whose five-story buildings were forcibly renovated, citizens of pre-retirement age, and so on.
“Anti-sanctions” were added to the sanctions, objectionable sites were blocked, the abuse of power by the security forces increased exponentially, the standard of living fell, the international situation grew tense, but the Russians, with tenacity worthy of a better purpose, “swallowed” one innovation after another, not daring to protest. At the beginning of 2016, I ascribed this phenomenon to the psychological peculiarity of the Russian majority, when in the case of yet another stunt by the Russian government, the main necessity for the population becomes not changing the situation but simply getting an explanation for why such sacrifices were made.
This conformism, which was brought to an almost suicidal stage, gave rise to a special, irrational type of reaction to the aggression by the authorities – the desire to regain at all costs the feeling of lost comfort, a sense of security and stability. In order to regain this feeling, it would suffice to have a somewhat logical explanation that yet another blow against a person’s welfare was right, necessary and undertaken for his own good. Recall that even the disposal of sanctioned products did not cause strong outrage, but rather gave rise only to an increased need for an explanation. The second manifestation of this conformism was the desire to dissociate oneself from repressed groups, whether it be sexual minorities, Crimean Tatars, Jehovah’s Witnesses, “liberals” or someone else.
With the help of such a reaction, even the Russians who were not caught up in a wave of jingoism were able to reconcile themselves and “stop noticing” that their state had been waging an aggressive war on the territory of a neighboring country for six years and had turned itself into an outcast in international politics, so toxic in some countries that it led to a no longer an imaginary, but a real Russophobia. People had come to terms with falling incomes, criminal persecution for reposts, the disappearance of affordable medications, constant environmental disasters, and an almost daily menacing with a nuclear baton on TV. Local politics and solving local issues, including the fight against corruption, became a kind of “internal emigration”, the last illusion of freedom that was left to the active part of society and allowed people to feel that they could do something and influence something.
In response, the Kremlin made it clear: there will be no more pretense of democracy. The behavior of the election commissions, followed by the security officials, showed that the last island of an imaginary “normal life” with minimal freedom of action and choice was completely destroyed. Along with it, the Russians lost not only the remnants of freedom but also such a longed-for sense of inner comfort, a feeling that “nothing terrible has happened”, that “it can still be like it was before”. It’s no longer possible to explain the unexplainable or to “ignore” what is happening when the violence is being used directly against you. Violence by the authorities overcame the last frontier of psychological defense – of course, not for everyone, but for a fairly large part of the most active part of the population. It is no coincidence that Russian experts note the following:
“Now this is not just a demonstration for some elections to be fair, but this is a demonstration for me not to get a club to the head while walking in the center of Moscow. This is a demonstration for personal safety. And this has an incredible effect of mobilizing people”.
War until victory
Meanwhile, the method which the authorities have chosen to deal with popular discontent will apparently remain unchanged, and this marks the victory of the conventional “party of war”. Thus, the well-known Russian analyst and publicist Andrei Piontkovsky cites evidence of “insider sources” stating that a “mobilization party” has finally formed in Russia under the unspoken leadership of Nikolai Patrushev and Yuri Kovalchuk.
“The mobilization party sees a huge and powerful revanchist Soviet state that controls half the world. And the rest of the world is afraid of it,” openly claims one of the insiders, Alexei Venediktov.
Police detains protesters in Moscow on 10 August.
According to another source, Valery Solovey, this party seeks to finally defeat the West, primarily through direct aggression combined with a constant increase in tension, bluffing and nuclear blackmail that the Western countries will not be able to withstand and as a result will surrender to the onslaught from Moscow. And, of course, this party intends to completely cleanse the Russian political sphere from any manifestations of opposition.
Andrei Piontkovsky’s conclusions are echoed by Russian military analysts. Thus, Valery Kamenev, a regular author at the Military Review website which is close to the Ministry of Defense, admits quite frankly: both in foreign and domestic politics, the Kremlin will no longer pretend to be peaceful, and repressions against the Russian opposition is only a reflection of the new trend in global politics.
“After all this, Russia can’t expect anything from the United States: Trump is not eternal, the “democrats” Biden-Clinton and Congress are successfully chewing him up today. But if there’s nothing more to come from an agreement with Washington, there’s no point in enduring further the Western special project “Navalny” and turning a blind eye to its financing by the West. The wheel of the “big game” has turned and Moscow’s policy towards the United States is changing: Putin officially announced that Russia “will no longer come forward with political initiatives.” Trump’s America is undemocratic, so our “democrats” are no longer needed either. And the Investigative Committee has seen a criminal billion rubles in the accounts of FBK “anti-corruption” Navalny. Under the slogan “For Fair Elections”, they will close his project based on him being an accomplice in the interference of the Western special services in the Russian elections, which received funding from abroad for their actions,” predicts Kamenev.
The trends at the moment are obvious: the “mobilization party” will continue its aggressive onslaught against the “internal and external” enemies, increasingly narrowing for the thinking Russians the possibility of “internal emigration” to imaginary-liberal local islands. At the same time, the number of protest-minded Russians will also increase: first from a natural desire to defend at least the last barrier before the cliff – personal security, and second, due to growing economic problems. The “Party of War” made it clear that in the confrontation with the West, it relies on determination in brandishing arms and psychological pressure, and not on the economic competition between the systems. Moreover, judging by the logic of Patrushev and Co., in the current environment, an already weak economy will simply be ignored, compensated by the growing militaristic hysteria.
Apparently, given the peaceful nature of the protests, the repressive machine will emerge victorious from this situation. Similar processes could be observed during the failed Belarusian “Revolution through Social Networks” in 2011: despite large-scale protests throughout the country that lasted almost a year, repressions did its job, again suppressing popular discontent for several years. On the other hand, the already mentioned Valery Solovey predicts that a full-fledged dictatorship in Russia will not be established, and protest activity will increase.
Kseniya Kirillova for QHA Media
- Russian protests don’t threaten Kremlin for one simple reason, Portnikov says
- Ex-Berkut chief suspected of organizing Euromaidan massacre now dispersing protests in Moscow
- “Russia now has more prostitutes than doctors, farmers and firemen combined”
- ‘Is Putin a CIA agent or only the richest man on Earth?’
- Given rising Russian protests, Putin has three options – and none is good for Ukraine, Portnikov says
- Protests on the rise across Russia – even where there never were ever before
- Kremlin’s ‘Mobilization Party’ believes limited nuclear strike would save its power at home and boost Russia abroad
- Moscow deploys Russian Guard and OMON against truckers in Daghestan
- Moscow seeks to discredit Russian protests by suggesting Ukraine is behind them
- ’14 million Russians don’t have enough money even for food’
- Russia’s long-haul truckers resume strike on Rotenberg’s birthday
- Moscow police make arrests during series of protests against war in Ukraine