EU Eastern Partnership experts say Ukraine’s opening of KGB archives is exemplary

The opening of KGB archives is prescribed by one of the decommunization laws adopted in 2015. Photo: SBU archive

The opening of KGB archives is prescribed by one of the decommunization laws adopted in 2015. Photo: SBU archive 

Analysis & Opinion

Ukraine’s decommunization laws sparked controversy when they were adopted in 2015. Two years later, one of the laws has proven to yield excellent results – the opening of the KGB archives. The way Ukraine is exposing the workings of its repressive apparatus is being praised by experts from EU Eastern Partnership countries, the societies of which were deeply permeated and controlled by the Soviet secret police.

Experts from the countries of the Eastern Partnership spoke about access to the archives of the communist secret services in their countries during a press conference held at the Ukraine Crisis Media Center in Kyiv.

The experts in the Ukrainian Crisis Media Center

The experts in the Ukrainian Crisis Media Center. Photo: snapshot from video

Samvel Martirosyan, media expert, Armenia:

“Armenia demolished all the monuments to Lenin as early as the 90s. The State Security Committee (KGB) timely said that it was siding with the new authority. Armenia was considering the opening of the archives largely in the context of lustration but our archives have been closed so far. Everyone is afraid that there will be a lot of scandals because Armenia is a small country where everyone knows each other. However, it’s important for historians, political scientists, or analysts to have access to archives, and they must be open to them.”

Dmitry Drozd, historian and archivist, Belarus:

“Not only do our Lenins not fall but, on the contrary, there are new ones. There are also new monuments to Stalin. Stalin Line Museum was created near Minsk, and there are Stalin Streets. There is a monument to Dzerzhinsky [founder of Soviet repressive organs] at the police school. In such conditions, there can be no question of the opening of documents. Historians in Belarus have no prospects of dealing with the field of the 20th century: the state does not support such topics.”

Igor Kashu, Director of the Center for the Study of Totalitarianism, History, and Philosophy of the Moldovan State University, Moldova:

“We de facto began decommunization and the opening of archives back in 2010 when the Commission for the Study and Evaluation of the Communist Totalitarian Regime under the President of Moldova was established. For some reason, the KGB archives are inside the [Communist] Party archives and not in the archives of the Security Service. We found many important documents, particularly about the 19461947 famine in Moldova and Bessarabia. A ministerial “special folder” cited 152 cases of cannibalism, a criterion that indicates the ultimate stage of the famine.

 

Opening of these documents is very important for the health of society. This is not just the past because, in words of the English historian, history for the society is like psychoanalysis for an individual. We can become healthy only if we again pass what our ancestors passed and free ourselves from it.

In Ukraine, not only the archives have been opened but also the information has been made public on what funds exist and what they can be searched for. We suppose that we may also have such funds but we do not know yet where to reach them. Ukraine today becomes an example of how to open KGB archives.”

Ukrainian Insurgent Army participants from the Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast and bofons (money of the Ukrainian rebels). Photo: SBU archive

Ukrainian Insurgent Army participants from the Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast and bofons (money of the Ukrainian rebels). Photo: SBU archiveз

Rafik Ramahanov, Archives of the Azerbaijani Security Service:

“We finished with the communists back in the 90s. Then people were burning their [Communist] party cards and demolishing Lenin monuments. They [party cards] have not preserved even in the archives. However, there is only partial access to the KGB documentation. Much secret information has preserved: about agents, secret informants, and the pieces stamped as ‘classified.’ Victims of repression and their relatives have the right to get acquainted with their case files but for this purpose they must provide relevant documents confirming the kinship. These requests are considered by a special expert council. There is no question about the complete opening of the archives.

 

Ukraine has done enormous work before the opening of the archives: information campaigns, work with focus groups, and expert interviews. This is a positive example of serving the people to restore the truth.”

Irakli Hvadagiani, Georgian Research Laboratory SovLab:

“It’s nearly impossible for a researcher to be openly denied access to the files. The opening of the archives formally took place after the Rose Revolution. However, if they do not want to give out the file, they use two formulas: it either burned down or was carried to Russia. Some of the KGB archives were indeed burned down in Georgia in the 90s, and another part was transferred to Smolensk. In addition, this topic is not very popular among historians—for the most part, such documents are requested by foreign researchers who come to Georgia.

What prevents the work in the archives are the inconceivable prices. The cost of copying one page of a document is 1.50 euros. Imagine how much money you have to spend in order to write one small academic article. The fact that, in Ukraine, it is possible to take copies of the documents for free is really impressive.”

On 2122 September, the seminar “Open access to the archives of the KGB: Ukrainian experience for the Eastern Partnership countries” was held in Kyiv. It was organized by the Center for the Study of the Liberation Movement with the support of the Czech Embassy in Ukraine. For two days, Ukrainian experts were discussing how to make the archives of the communist secret services open, which risks should be avoided, and how to talk about the evidence preserved in KGB documents.

In April 2015, the Ukrainian Parliament voted for the “decommunization laws” pack, including the law “On access to archives of repressive agencies of the 19171991 totalitarian communist regime.” Today, Ukraine has been one of the most liberal modes of legislation regarding access to the files among other post-Soviet countries: researchers can study archival files at no charge, make photocopies, and freely distribute the information.

Read also:

Translated by: Ihor Vynokurov
Source: cdvr.org.ua

Tags: , , ,

  • Ihor Dawydiak

    “The truth will set you free”. While this may not be the case in the immediate and current interests of the national security of a nation, it should not be relevant in the case of Soviet archives as the USSR was disbanded in 1991. For those who maintain that these archives should be hidden from public view then it could only be surmised that they have something to hide which in turn could affect in a negative way those who are in power. The Putin regime would be a classic example of this inability or refusal to reveal the truth as they are just as bad as their Soviet predecessors.