Biggest opposition to land reform in Ukraine is fear

Analysis & Opinion

Mr. Denys Nizalov, Associate Lecturer in Economics at the University of Kent, UK, believes that the Ukraine’s moratorium on sale of agricultural land remains a key reason why agricultural productivity in Ukraine is among the lowest in Europe despite the fact that Ukraine has some of the best soils. He states, “The biggest opposition to land reform is fear that something will go wrong.”

Here we publish key highlights from the interview with Mr. Nizalov on land reform issues in Ukraine. You can watch the full interview on the video attached to this article.

 

Ban on sale of agricultural land in Ukraine

Ukraine does not have a functional market for agricultural land Ukraine imposed a ban on sale of agricultural land, a moratorium, impacting most private plots and all state agricultural land – about 42 million hectares in total.

Under this moratorium, owners cannot fully exercise their constitutional rights for free disposal of their private property. Moratorium causes significant inefficiencies in agricultural production and remains a key reason why agricultural productivity is among the lowest in Europe despite the fact that Ukraine has some of the best soils and weather conditions in the world for crops. The moratorium is also the reason why agriculture is under invested.

Farmers cannot use land as collateral for borrowing from banks. And in the case of foreclosure, banks have no use for land that it cannot sell. This moratorium prevents potential investment of billions of dollars in Ukrainian agriculture.

Most vulnerable are small and medium farms, farmers which are credit constrained. Large farms have access to international markets and cheap credit.

In Ukraine, 27 million hectares are private while 10 million belongs to the state. Both private and state land cannot be sold. Land can be distributed through the rental market. Currently, 16 million hectares are rented to agricultural producers.

The original reason for moratorium on sale of land in Ukraine was the fear that land would be quickly accumulated by a small group of landowners and large producers. Property rights and land plots need to be properly recorded by the government.

Agriculture producers learned that operating under the moratorium was more profitable in the short-term because land rental prices remained very low. As such, these producers have established a significant lobby in the government. However, the market has hit a ceiling and things have changed

Land reform advantages

Political populism interferes with land reform. Significant grey market, shadow market for land, competes with large producers who operate formally. Shadow market has different, lower cost structures, and established opportunities for corruption

Land reform would have significant economic benefits to Ukraine’s economy. Most producers, however, are involved in commodity crops, low value-added crops. Relative to other countries, Ukraine has a small share of high value-added crops, e.g. fruits, vegetables, specialty crops, orchards, livestock. Significant amounts would be invested in irrigation infrastructure, greenhouses, etc.

User rights, rental rights are not properly recorded or registered. Tenants are vulnerable to wrongdoings. Many errors were made in recording land parcels.

No banking products or financial instruments that would accept land as collateral; Government of Ukraine should establish various instruments such as partial guarantee funds, special programs for small farmers, partial interest rate reimbursement, etc. Without this infrastructure, land reforms in Ukraine will not succeed. Rights of all owners and users must be equally protected, otherwise, there will be excessive concentration of land ownership, control, and other negative consequences

Gradual market opening and transition period will see an oversupply of land flooding the market because unused land parcels accumulated during the moratorium. The government should impose controls on excessive speculation and pricing during this period.

Biggest opposition to land reform

I spent 50% of my time in Ukraine communicating directly with different stakeholders: farm associations, local government representatives, etc. Most producers understand the moratorium is a roadblock.

The biggest opposition to land reform is fear that something will go wrong, rights will not be protected. The legal system must be upgraded to protect rights. Greater transparency required over governance of land resources, i.e. land governance monitoring system. Lack of accountability in government and legal system.

People have very little trust in government. Regardless if reforms are good or not, any action by the government is viewed as a potential threat. People are afraid of changes a potential threat. People are afraid of change.


Read also:

 

About Dr. Denys Nizalov

  • Associate Lecturer in Economics at the University of Kent, UK
  • Former Assistant Professor at Kyiv School of Economics, Ukraine
  • Director of the project “Capacity Development for Evidence-Based Land & Agricultural Policy Making Project in Ukraine”
  • Editor at VoxUkraine

Source: UkeTube

Tags: , ,

  • Ihor Dawydiak

    There are in fact many different ways that the Ukrainian Government could employ to allay any fear or concern that a few rich citizens or companies might buy up a very high percentage of commercially viable land or any land for that matter without the use of a moratorium. One way would be to restrict through various criteria the amount of land owned by a single individual or company and anyone else who might be affiliated both directly and indirectly with a specified individual or company. In any case, monopolization can prove to be harmful in the way of price fixing, usurpation of power as well as general competition. Therefore, unless any individual, group or company can prove that any excess purchase of land would only work in favor of the national interest then their holdings should be limited as to the specified amount permitted by the laws of Ukraine.