Ryanair canceled its plans to enter Ukrainian market. Is the story over?

Image: Wikimedia commons 


Article by: Vitalii Rybak

Ryanair lowcost airline announced on 10 July it had canceled its planned entry into Ukrainian market. David O’Brien, Ryanair’s Chief Commercial Officer, said in an official statement that “Ukraine is not yet a sufficiently mature or reliable business location to invest valuable Ryanair aircraft capacity.” According to O’Brien, the withdrawal will result in the “loss of over 500,000 customers and 400 airport jobs in the first year alone, which would have provided a significant boost to the Ukrainian economy.”

This development follows Boryspil airport’s failure to honor a growth agreement reached at the Ministry of Infrastructure with airport officials and the current airport director general, Pavlo Ryabikin. Ryabikin himself, however, is sure that this was a right decision.

“Ryanair’s demands were extremely harsh and far from market standards. This deal would have resulted in 2 billion hryvnias losses yearly for the airport,” Boryspil’s director general argued at a press-briefing.

He also recalled that another Kyiv’s airport, Zhuliany, had also closed negotiations with Ryanair in May 2017 due to the very same reasons, but nobody paid attention because hopes for Boryspil were high.

Economichna Pravda published a list of Ryanair’s demands which was announced by Ryabikin. They are:

  • Free air navigation;
  • Free registration desks;
  • Free taxi stops;
  • Free ad spaces;
  • Free rent of space for commercial points in terminals;
  • Free baggage claim system;
  • Free ticket offices;
  • Free land near airport for hotel construction;
  • Constant parking spaces for plains;
  • Airport charge of 7,5 dollars per passenger for the next 4 years;
  • 35% share of duty-free incomes;
  • Possibility of 60-day credit from airport’s side.

Meanwhile, the Ukrainian government has a different opinion. Volodymyr Omelian, Ukraine’s infrastructure minister, has argued that Ryanair scrapped its plans because of the resistance of Ukraine’s International Airlines (UIA), a Ukrainian air carrier monopolist, and Boryspil airport.

“In the meantime, Lviv airport has signed an absolutely lucrative contract with Ryanair. Boryspil has been offered the same conditions. However, Boryspil’s goal was different from the outset: to block Ryanair’s entry into Ukraine without any space for negotiations. I hoped Mr. Ryabikin would heed not only to the opinion of [Boryspil stakeholders] Mayberg or Kolomoiskiy but to the leadership of the country. He decided to play his own way,” the minister said. Omelyan also suggested to fire Ryabikin.

Social networks were furious about this development and blame UIA of unfair competition which “kicked Ryanair out.” UIA has a bad reputation among Ukrainians due to its high fares and mediocre service. Moreover, UIA is positioned as Ukraine’s national airline, even though it belongs to Ihor Kolomoiskiy, a Ukrainian oligarch. Moreover, UIA owes UAH 300 mn ($11.5 mn) to the state.

Users are also complaining that it would be harder to enjoy benefits of the visa-free regime, as only WizzAir offers cheap flights to Europe. Moreover, Ryanair’s entry has a huge symbolic importance of Ukrainians, as this airline is considered to be the cheapest and most widespread in Europe and therefore connects Europe.

At the same time, experts see additional reasons for Ryanair’s decision to pull out from Ukraine. Artur Viniukov-Proshchenko, an expert of Ukrainian logistical alliance, suggested in a commentary for Ukrinform that Irish company was not impressed by the pre-sales of tickets in Ukraine and marked this market as not perspective enough.

In the meantime, Volodymyr Groysman, Ukraine’s PM, announced that talks with Ryanair will continue. Groysman said he held a special meeting with the leadership of the infrastructure and justice ministries, Boryspil airport, Airports Association of Ukraine and Office of Investment Promotion and Support. As a result, decisions were made, which were “accepted by all participants,” Ukraine’s PM noted. Here is what has been decided:

  • The National Anti-Corruption Bureau and the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine will assess the entire negotiation process regarding compliance with the legislation and conditions of the competition. Infrastructure and justice ministries, as well as the Boryspil airport will participate as well;
  • The negotiation process with Ryanair will continue. Daniel Bilak, the director of the Investment Promotion Office, will be involved alongside the infrastructure ministry and Boryspil airport;
  • The infrastructure ministry will speed up the development of the Transport Sector Development Strategy in the air segment. Moreover, a strategy for the development of Ukrainian airports will be looked into, including the involvement of low-cost airlines.

These signals show that the story of Ryanair’s attempt to enter Ukrainian market is not over yet.

Prepared by Vitalii Rybak for UkraineWorld group (ukraineworld.org)

Read more:



Source: ukraineworld.org

Dear readers! Since you’ ve made it to this point, we have a favor to ask. Russia’s hybrid war against Ukraine is ongoing, but major news agencies have gone away, which is why it's extra important to provide news about Ukraine in English. We are a small independent journalist team on a shoestring budget, have no political or state affiliation, and depend on our readers to keep going (using the chanсe - a big thank you to our generous supporters, we couldn't make it without you.)  If you like what you see, please help keep us online with a donation

Tags: , , , ,


  1. Avatar Screwdriver says:

    “Ukraine is not yet a sufficiently mature or reliable business location” – What a surprise! LOL

    1. Avatar veth says:

      Russia is a fascist nazzi-state, no credible business partner!

  2. Avatar Scradje says:

    Wizzair is a better airline and does not exploit its passengers. Ryanair is a disagreeable flying experience and even more disagreeable to deal with for suppliers and business partners. Chiselers.

    1. Avatar Steve says:

      I cannot speak about Ryanair as I have never traveled with them. But my experience with Wizzair was absolutely THEE worst experience in my almost 50 years of air travel not only as a passenger but as a person who is also a pilot himself.

      1. Avatar Scradje says:

        Of dear! Of course all budget airlines cut corners, sometimes with unpleasant results. The unusual thing about the boss of Ryanair though, is apart from his ahem, robust sense of humour, he is rather proud of the company’s attitude to customers: they’re scum! Quite an innovative approach, but strangely it seems to work for them:

  3. Avatar Tony says:

    Well it seems they wanted many free services from the airport, is that normal or predatory?
    “35% share of duty-free incomes”
    Is that what the airport pays Ryanair or the other way around? The former would be a bit insane.

    “Free land near airport for hotel construction”
    That’s a tough call, the airport would need to buy land and gift it to Ryan air. On the other hand they would create jobs by building and running a hotel (which would take business away from competitors).
    It’s difficult to judge if these terms would be a net gain or loss for Kyiv. How did they determine that it was a “lucrative” for Lviv?