Profound contraction of ethnic Russians in former Soviet republics since 1989

Russian President Boris Yeltsin visiting Tyva Republic, a federal subject of the Russian Federation located on the border with Mongolia, in 1994

Russian President Boris Yeltsin visiting Tyva Republic, a federal subject of the Russian Federation located on the border with Mongolia, in 1994 

International, More

The number of ethnic Russians in what were the non-Russian republics of the former Soviet Union has fallen from 25 million in 1989 to 14 million today, but only 6.5 million of that decline consists of Russians who returned to the Russian Federation. The remainder is almost evenly divided by excess deaths over births and assimilation.

According to a new report by the Russian7 channel, approximately 2.5 million ethnic Russians changed their identity from Russian to that of the titular nationality. Of these approximately two million are in Ukraine.

The other decline in the number of ethnic Russians there reflected natural population losses because the members of that community had higher death rates and lower birthrates “than representatives of the other nationalities, the station reports, sometimes because of age structure and sometimes because of the actions of the authorities as in Tajikistan and Chechnya.

It is intriguing to say the least that this article on the decline of ethnic Russians in the former union republics also focuses on the decline of ethnic Russians from the non-Russian republics of the North Caucasus and the Middle Volga which at least nominally are still within the borders of the post-Soviet Russian Federation.

In what was the Chechen-Ingush ASSR in Soviet times, ethnic Russians numbered 290,000. Today in the two successor republics, they number only about 23,000.

In Daghestan and in Tatarstan, the situation is not as bad for ethnic Russians, the station continues, but in both places, there has been a decline in the number of ethnic Russians.

With regard to Ukraine, the ethnic Russian population there has “actively been assimilated.” Only a third of the three million decline in the number of ethnic Russians in Ukraine between 1989 and now is the product of emigration. The rest involves assimilation in the first case and lower birthrates and higher death rates among ethnic Russians.

Elsewhere, the picture is also bleak, the station says. In Kazakhstan, three million of the 6.5 million ethnic Russians who had lived in that Central Asian republic have emigrated.

But in the Baltic countries, despite problems for ethnic Russians in Estonia and Latvia, few Russians have emigrated because of the relatively better economic situation there.

The fewest Russians now remain in Tajikistan and Georgia. Only 30,000 of the 390,000 ethnic Russians who had been in the former in 1989 are still there. And in Georgia there has been a similar decline.


As for Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Azerbaijan, the number of Russians has declined by more than half.


Edited by: A. N.

Dear readers! Since you’ ve made it to this point, we have a favor to ask. Russia’s hybrid war against Ukraine is ongoing, but major news agencies have gone away, which is why it's extra important to provide news about Ukraine in English. We are a small independent journalist team on a shoestring budget, have no political or state affiliation, and depend on our readers to keep going (using the chanсe - a big thank you to our generous supporters, we couldn't make it without you.)  If you like what you see, please help keep us online with a donation

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


  1. Avatar Ihor Dawydiak says:

    There is one primary reason which prompted the mass exodus of ethnic Russians from all of the non-Russian former Republics of the USSR and to a lesser extent the non-Russian Autonomous Republics within Russia. The genie was let out of the bottle. To that effect, the ethnic Russians residing in the former Soviet Republics were no longer pampered, they were no longer considered as the “first among equals” (an allegory explaining this term can be found in George Orwell’s novel “The Animal Farm”), Russification had met its end and the Russian language was no longer considered as a prime language. Therefore, why would Pompous Putin even consider trying to restore a new Russian Empire? Then of course, why would anyone consider beating a dead horse? It simply doesn’t make any sense except for those who insist on living in the past with no eye for the future.

  2. Avatar zorbatheturk says:

    The Soviet Onion was an artificial entity. It created little, destroyed much, and has thankfully disappeared. Less RuSSians anywhere means more reasons to be happy. Of course most of those ex Soviet republics are now corrupt police states and effective dictatorships, like Uzbekistan.

    1. Avatar Scradje says:

      Yes. The S.U. was just the Russian empire under new management. Czarism, communism and now fascism under fuehrer pootler, the system of government changes but nothing else does. Unfortunately for Russia and the world.

      1. Avatar zorbatheturk says:

        A further breakup of the RuSSia is called for.