Moscow won’t succeed in using Ukrainian radicals to destabilize Kyiv, Portnikov says

Oleh Tyahnybok, the leader of Svoboda party shouting at soldiers of Ukrainian National Guard protecting the Verkhovna Rada before the grenade explosion on August 31, 2015 (Image: video capture)

Oleh Tyahnybok, the leader of Svoboda party, shouting at soldiers of Ukrainian National Guard protecting the Verkhovna Rada before the grenade explosion on August 31, 2015 (Image: video capture) 


Having failed to find the number of backers for the “Russian world” in Ukraine it expected, Moscow in the opinion of many in Kyiv is seeking to use Ukrainian radicals in the pursuit of its goal of destabilizing Kyiv to the point that Ukraine will fall back into Russia’s orbit, according to Vitaly Portnikov.

But that calculation is based on a fundamental misperception of Ukraine and Ukrainian politics after the Maidan, the Ukrainian commentator says, a misreading that ascribes far too much importance to the radicals who helped make the earlier revolution but have been eclipsed by the more rational leaders who have succeeded them.

Commenting on the violent confrontation yesterday in front of the Verkhovna Rada, the Ukrainian commentator points out, “informed observers in Kyiv are speaking about the beginning of a Russian special operation called ‘Golden Fall,’” one that will pursue the same goals as “the Russian Spring” but with different cadres.

“In the Lubyanka, they have come to understand that there are too few people in Ukraine ready to be backers of this Putin project.” Those who say they are for it are hardly willing to fight for it let alone die. Instead, and “according to the old Russian tradition, they lie on their stoves and wait for others to save them.”

Consequently, in the view of many, Moscow is quite reasonably from its point of view now placing its bets “on the Ukrainian world,” some of whose radical members can be counted on to “rise against ‘the criminal junta’ and make it easier for Vladimir Vladimirovich [Putin] to gain the return of insubordinate Ukraine,” Portnikov argues.

“Social risings, meetings against the authorities, excesses which claim lives, all of these will be ‘the Golden Fall’ of the Russian return to Ukraine. All this” if it works “would allow the Chekists and also their comrades in the Russian Presidential Administration” to claim victory over Ukraine.

However, Portnikov says, “this isn’t ‘the Golden Fall’” Moscow hopes for or that some Ukrainians fear. Instead, it is “evidence of the most profound lack of understanding by Ukrainian politicians of the psychology of people whom they lead” as well as an equally profound lack of understanding in Moscow of where Ukraine now is.

Oleh Tyahnybok, the leader of Svoboda, did not play the role after the Maidan that some of his followers expected. He didn’t prevent the Russian occupation of Crimea, and “therefore after the Maidan the process of the disappearance of Svoboda from Ukrainian politics began.” His people didn’t get into the Verkhovna Rada, and he is losing positions in western Ukraine.

In order to try to save the situation, Tyahnybok has been trying “to reestablish a miracle – party out of the ruins,” and for him, “the voting on changes in the Constitution is a real gift,” because it allows him to strike a role and present himself on the political stage as someone standing up against “the treason of the authorities.”

“But Tyahnybok isn’t taking one thing into consideration,” Portnikov continues. In his rush to see treason under every bush, “he believes those who say that changes in the Constitution will bury Ukraine,” and thus, “he doesn’t understand why the National Guard is defending the traitors who must be blown up so they will not be able to vote.”


Like some other Ukrainian politicians, the commentator says, the Svoboda leader has been playing at politics over the last two years despite the fact that he is not in a theater as he appears to imagine but in the real world where people die and where “’the Golden Fall’ could turn out to be just as horrific as ‘the Russian Spring.’”

“It is necessary to stop playing,” but he and some others “will not stop. They simply are not able to do otherwise.” Not surprisingly, Moscow will do what it can to encourage them and exploit their actions for its own purpose. But hopefully, Portnikov concludes, the Ukrainian people will see through all this and not vote for those who are merely acting a part.

In another comment on yesterday’s events, this one for, Portnikov says that “what we are observing in Ukraine unfortunately is nothing new.” Instead, it is a feature of developments “after all successful risings” because “their more radical participants are never satisfied with the result.”

Such radicals “always suspect the more moderate part of society of betraying national interests. They are never in a position to realistically evaluate the potential of their own country and its role in the system of international relations … [and] they are always ready to kill their own” in pursuit of their radical goals.

He cites the examples of Ireland after it gained independence and of Israel, and he points out that “radical politicians always have it easier than do their supporters. For the politician, radicalism is a career. For their supporters, it is a faith. And each dead supporter becomes for the radical politician simply another step toward power.”

What is “most important,” Portnikov says, “is that the ambitions and populism of some and the naïve faith of others not lead to irreparable losses – death, war, and the destruction of the state.” Given what Ukraine is up against and its willingness to exploit anything it can for its purposes, those are real dangers: those who hear the calls of the radicals should remember that.

Edited by: A. N.

Dear readers! Since you’ ve made it to this point, we have a favor to ask. Russia’s hybrid war against Ukraine is ongoing, but major news agencies have gone away, which is why it's extra important to provide news about Ukraine in English. We are a small independent journalist team on a shoestring budget, have no political or state affiliation, and depend on our readers to keep going (using the chanсe - a big thank you to our generous supporters, we couldn't make it without you.)  If you like what you see, please help keep us online with a donation

Tags: , , , , , ,


  1. Avatar evanlarkspur says:

    Gosh, “screwdriver”, thanks for letting us all in on “what really happened!” What would we do without you?!

  2. Avatar Brent says:

    Hey “Screwball”, is that a swastika on the DPR terrorist patch that is your avatar?

    No, Moscow isn’t using radicals, thieves and murderers in Kyiv. It’s already busy enough managing those they have installed in Crimea and Donbass…..

    Which balaclava wearing chickensh*t are you in this photo?

    1. Avatar Brent says:

      Moscows radicals and hired thugs are all in Donbass. There are other ‘useful idiots’ in terrorist cells in Kharkiv, Odessa and other cities, but Donbass is lousy with Russia’s terrorists.

      You still haven’t said which one is you in the photo?

      1. Avatar Brent says:

        Guess what “Skippy” Screwball, it is no secret that some Ukrainians did align with Germany during World War II in order to try to get them to help rid Ukraine of their Russian overlords. It’s no secret. BUT WASN’T THE ENTIRE SOVIET EMPIRE ALSO THE ALLY OF GERMANY FOR THE FIRST TWO YEARS OF WORLD WAR II?

        You kind of forgot about that, didn’t you? TWO YEARS. ALLIES. MOLOTOV-RIBBENTROP PACT.

        And this year Russia even hosts fascist conferences in St Petersburg with your Vice Prime minister, Dmitry Rogozon as the host!!!


    2. Avatar Brent says:

      Why don’t you read what it says on the black sweatshirt… want to try and claim the “Kyiv street scene” as that propagandist rag would have someone wearing an ” I Russian” logo on their shirt?

      Nice try little sheeple….maybe you’ll also claim Pavel Gubarov, Alexei Milchakov and Anton Raevski are all fighting for Ukraine???