Investors fear default in Ukraine



Article by: Yury Vinnichuk

Ukraine is being compared with problematic Venezuela and Argentina which allowed default to happen. Loan givers do not believe in our country. 

Ukraine’s ‘default insurance’ has reached its maximum price since 2013. As such, on October 17, according to Deutsche Bank, Ukraine’s credit-default swaps (default insurance) have reached a maximum of 1402 for five-year bonds.

In simple terms, if an investor bought $10 million bonds from Ukraine, the insurance of sovereign risk (from possible default) will cost them $1,4 million annually. To compare, a year before such insurance cost $909 thousand for the same loan sum.

Today Ukraine’s loan bonds are in third place in terms of risk among 50 countries.

Venezuela takes second place, which this and next year have to return $17 billion of debt given to them before the presidential elections in 2012. Meanwhile only $20 billion remain in the country’s reserves. The situation is made more difficult due to the fall in prices on oil, the main export product of the country. “All the while, the Venezuelan government is not ready to make unpopular decisions such as devaluing state currency,” wrote The Economist in the beginning of October. Default insurance on Venezuelan debt costs 2067 points for five-year bonds.

And the leader of the anti-rating is Argentina, which allowed default in the end of June, even though its government never acknowledge it. This is the second default the South-American state is going through in the past 13 years. In 2001 the government of Argentina froze the citizens’ savings accounts. Mass protests and clashes with the police broke out in the streets, which resulted in several deaths.

The cost of current loans for Ukraine today is higher than it is, say, for Egypt or Kazakhstan.

“The loan cost for Ukraine is extremely high, as it is classified by international agencies as a pre-default country. De facto, today on the global market Ukraine’s default probability is viewed at 15%,” says head of projects with the League for Financial Development Andriy Blinov. “Overall Ukrainian sovereign bonds are profitable at a 20% annual level, which is extremely high for a European country.”

According to the specialist for bond sales at Dragon Capital Serghiy Fursa, investors do not believe in Ukraine due to high risks.

Since the beginning of the year, Euromaidan happened in Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovych and company fled, Russia occupied Crimea, separatist movements started in Donbas and, as a consequence, so did Ukraine’s war with terrorists and Russian troops, ruined industries and hryvnia’s 60% devaluation in relation to the dollar.

By the end of the year, Ukraine is to face a 8,3% GDP fall and over 20% of inflation. “Look at our ratings, they are extremely low,” Fursa says.

In 2014 rating agency Fitch lowered Ukraine’s rating to pre-default levels. Moody’s lowered the rating of our country (with a negative prognosis) to the level of Greece, Cyprus and Jamaica.

Ukrainian business bonds are now sold with great discounts. According to Fursa, Ukrlandfarming bonds are now sold at 65% of its nominal value, the discount is 35%. The discount on the bonds of the biggest mining and metallurgy holding Metinvest, belonging to Rinat Akhmetov and Vadym Novinsky, is 30%, and 40% for DTEK (which also belongs to Akhmetov).

Some companies, such as agricultural holding Mriya or the Kharkiv state-owned aviation factory, allowed a technical default. Recently Metinvest asked loan-givers to restructure a $500 million loan until November 2017.

Other companies, which have to pay their debts by the end of 2014 – 2015, will follow its example. The Ukrainian government is still silent about intentions to restructure even part of the loans and assures that Ukraine will not allow default to occur.

Finance experts aren’t this optimistic. “I would not be so sure that Ukraine will not allow default. It is the worst-case scenario, of course. It is not a cure but a trauma to the economy,” says executive parter at Capital Times Eric Nighman. “Once again, it is possible that selective debt restructuring may occur.”

In the end of 2013, after Yanukovych met with Vladimir Putin, Ukraine sold $3 billion Eurobonds to Russia with the payment due in December of 2015. The conditions of this agreement state that if the limit of the state debt surpasses 60% of Ukraine’s annual GDP (according to 2014 measures), Russia can demand that Ukraine pay the debt early.

As of the beginning of September, the state debt to GDP-2013 ratio constituted 61,8%, while in the beginning of the year the number was 43%. According to the IMF, Ukraine’s debt as a state in 2014 will constitute 67,6% of the GDP, and 73,4% in 2015.

“Everyone expects that Russia will demand early payoffs for the $3 billion Eurobonds and this will provoke Ukraine’s decision to declare default,” says Nighman.

Overall in 2015 Ukraine has to pay back $9 billion to the loan-givers. Another $5 billion and $8 billion are due in 2016 and 2017, respectively.

Ukraine plans to pay the debts using the funds it receives from the IMF. So far out of the $17 billion prescribed in the two-year program, it has received $4,4 billion in 2014.

Translated by: Mariya Shcherbinina

Source: Insider

Dear readers! Since you’ ve made it to this point, we have a favor to ask. Russia’s hybrid war against Ukraine is ongoing, but major news agencies have gone away, which is why it's extra important to provide news about Ukraine in English. We are a small independent journalist team on a shoestring budget, have no political or state affiliation, and depend on our readers to keep going (using ťhe chance - a big thank you to our generous supporters, we couldn't make it without you). We are now $5,000 short of our financial goal and need your support to continue working. If you like what you see, please help keep us online with a donation!

Tags: , ,


  1. Avatar Rods says:

    As Margaret Thatcher famously said ‘you can’t buck the markets’. At the end of the day investors are either investing their own money or somebody else’s on their behalf. They will look at the risks and at the rewards of interest or dividend payments and / or capital growth against the risks of default for the businesses or government bonds they are looking to invest in. Return ‘of’ the money is always more important than return ‘on’ the money, due to the length of time it takes to recover from any total or near total losses. Markets and the pricing of risk v reward have a little fashion, but almost no bias or sentiment. It is always about the money.

    Ukraine, has a direct war with Russia in the East with the economic costs of fighting that, along with the loss of industrial and agricultural production and taxes, damage to infrastructure and many other forms of disruption, plus there is a further indirect war on your economy by Putin, who is using every tool at his disposal, to make conditions for the Ukrainian economy as difficult as possible.

    Personally from day one, I have thought that where Ukraine has had problems with Russia over the EU agreement, that Putin’s strategy is to try and turn Ukraine into a failed state to secures his own political position and long term future, so he can point to Ukraine and say that is what happens if you move towards the west! It is vital for Ukraine’s future that this is contested and won, which is why the reform of Ukraine’s corrupt and broken system is so vital, where the country needs to move from the mega-wealthy corrupt few, to the reasonably well off many, who reap the rewards from their skills and hard work.

    Ukraine’s old fashioned business laws and the resultant difficulty in doing business, but even more importantly the endemic corruption is holding back your economy. This corruption is everything from a Rada Deputy, who is above the law, making you a well undervalued offer for your business that you can’t refuse, to significant sums in brown envelopes for everything from getting you accounts signed off, settling tax disputes, to getting the licences required to operate. All of this corruption is time consuming for the business owner(s), where they want to get on with running the business, drives up the cost of doing business by increases costs, reduces competitiveness and means there is less money for investment in new plant and expanding the business.

    Therefore, to win the peace it is vital that Ukraine reforms, simplifies and streamlines their laws, makes the judiciary transparent, but most of all dramatically reduces corruption and makes it very easy for this to be exposed, so corrupt officials live in fear of their illegal acts being publicized and ending up not on in a court of law but also in the court of public opinion. To me this corruption especially that of the police, tax officials, border guards and customs officers, plus many other state officials is Ukraine’s biggest challenge. Ukraine’s success or failure rests on the success or failure of defeating this corruption. Part of succeeding on this must be by making, the taking bribes, being seen by the vast majority of the public as a highly anti-social act, that makes everybody poorer.

    The pluses are that Ukraine has a well educated, skilled, workforce, has a strong agricultural sector, some natural resources and a collective will to succeed. If Ukraine succeeds with it modernization, you will get the foreign investment and a rapidly growing economy, to become over the next 20 years or so, a rich European nation. The once in a generation opportunely, as you currently have the political will at the top, means it is in the hands of all of the people in Ukraine to keep the pressure on to make sure you succeed.

    Euromaiden, please keep pushing the politicians on reform, so all your hard work and all the sacrifices that have been made, to date, are not in vain, but bring you and the Ukrainian people the success and rewards you deserve.

    Glory to Ukraine.

  2. Avatar W8post says:

    Not a pretty sight of the Maidan, but very impressive!