"Only two people will be smiling: one of them is Vladimir Putin in Russia, the other is Xi Jinping in Beijing. I don't know about you, but I don't want to give either of those two a Christmas present," UK Foreign Secretary David Cameron told the Aspen Security Forum.Intense debates over Ukraine in the US might create the impression that Kyiv has lost its earlier American support. However, this is not true. US military backing for Kyiv is unquestionably in America's interests. If Putin succeeds in capturing Ukraine, Washington will face significant challenges. In such a scenario, Americans may need to decide if they are willing to risk lives, perhaps for Estonia, a potential next target for Russia.
"We can't let Putin win. If Putin takes Ukraine, he won't stop there. If Putin attacks a NATO ally, and we've committed, as a NATO member, to defend every inch of NATO territory, then we'll have something that we don't seek, and that we don't have today - American troops fighting Russian troops," said US President Joe Biden.

What's hindering the right choice?
So, what's causing the disagreements and intentional delays in decisions clearly beneficial for Americans? Support for Ukraine seems to have become a pawn in domestic political maneuvering. Since September 2023, Biden has urged Congress for an extra $24 billion in aid for Ukraine, but disagreements with Republicans thwarted this request. In late September, Congress passed a temporary budget that excluded aid to Ukraine, which Biden subsequently signed. Following this, the Biden administration made another attempt. The proposal, presented to the Senate, sought approval for a $110.5 billion allocation to support Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan, with $61 billion specifically designated for Ukraine. However, Republicans, recognizing the importance of ongoing military aid to Ukraine for the Biden administration, decided to use their votes to push through an issue crucial to them: addressing the urgent migration crisis at the US-Mexico border. Democrats are hesitant to include these measures, creating a point of contention.
Inside the Senate fray
Over the past few weeks, the US Senate has become the central platform for negotiating additional funding for Ukraine. Intense bargaining took place between Republicans and Democrats. In particular, one closed-door meeting in which Volodymyr Zelenskyy canceled his online speech erupted into a massive argument between senators and President Biden's administration representatives. Ultimately, on 6 December, the vote failed when the issue was brought to the Senate floor again. Senators - including every single Republican - voted 51 to 49 against advancing the bill, with 60 votes needed. The Democratic Party holds a 51-seat majority in the Senate, but Republicans took advantage of the filibuster tactic - an endless debate on the bill that requires at least 60 votes to end. The vote throws into uncertainty the future of aid to Ukraine and sends lawmakers back to the negotiating table just days before Congress has scheduled its winter recess.What's on the Republican wish list?
Trending Now

"The Biden administration has done this intentionally. For what reason? Everybody asks me all the time. I think that ultimately they hope to turn all these illegals into voters for their side. It sounds sinister, but there's no other explanation for what's happening down there," said the US House of Representatives speaker, Republican Mike Johnson, in May 2023.

Clock for Ukraine aid is ticking
Time is running out for Congress to approve aid for Ukraine before the 14 December deadline when lawmakers go on winter recess. House Speaker Mike Johnson has indicated he does not plan to extend the House schedule. Therefore, after that date, Congress cannot approve any additional funding. The White House will only have about $4.5 billion available from a Pentagon accounting error.
- Putin declares goal to reshape global order, funds major military surge
- What's at stake if Ukraine loses?
- Biden: “Failure to support Ukraine is just absolutely crazy”