Copyright © 2024 Euromaidanpress.com

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Prigozhin’s rebellion exposed severe weaknesses in Kremlin and Russian Ministry of Defense – ISW

Prigozhin’s rebellion exposed severe weaknesses in Kremlin and Russian Ministry of Defense – ISW
Wagner’s insurrection exposed an erosion in Putin’s monopoly on force and put a spotlight on the fragility of Russia’s military reserves.

The Kremlin’s response to the recent armed rebellion led by Yevgeniy Prigozhin reveals alarming vulnerabilities within Russia’s power structures, says the Institute for the Study of War (ISW). Prigozhin’s rapid advancement toward Moscow revealed significant shortcomings in the Kremlin’s ability to quickly mobilize against an internal threat, as well as glaring inefficiencies in the Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD).

As ISW reports, this revolt, which exposed an erosion in Putin’s monopoly on force, has not only undermined the Russian security apparatus but also demonstrated that independent military forces can achieve notable results, even against Russia’s regular forces. As a result, key figures within Russia’s government and state-owned enterprises have been left to ponder the power dynamics between the central state and private military forces. This event has put a spotlight on the fragility of Russia’s military reserves, which are heavily committed to the ongoing war in Ukraine.

Despite being caught off guard by the rebellion, Kremlin showed no resistance to Prigozhin’s forces in Rostov-on-Don, a development that has raised questions about the effectiveness of Russia’s domestic intelligence service, the FSB. The fact that Prigozhin had consistently escalated his rhetoric against the Russian Ministry of Defense before the armed rebellion and Putin’s failure to mitigate this risk paints a bleak picture of the state’s internal security mechanisms.

The ISW report further points out that while the Kremlin struggled to mount a swift response to Prigozhin’s advances, Russian authorities mobilized the Russian National Guard and other special units to counter the rebellion. Despite their activation, these forces failed to engage with Prigozhin’s forces, even as they captured key military assets.

In a similar vein, the report highlights that the rebellion has shown the deficiency of Russian forces in many rear areas, and it will almost certainly affect the morale of Russian personnel in Ukraine, potentially influencing the Ukrainian forces’ strategy against Russian defenses.

In response to Prigozhin’s rebellion, Putin decided to back the Russian Ministry of Defense, underlining his ongoing efforts to centralize control of Russian irregular forces, including Wagner, over Prigozhin. However, the Lukashenko-brokered agreement will likely result in the dissolution of the Wagner Group as an independent entity led by Prigozhin. The agreement, which strips Prigozhin of his control over the Wagner Group, may lead to the integration of some part of the Wagner Group under the Russian Ministry of Defense.

In the aftermath of the rebellion, Prigozhin’s support base within the ultranationalist community, the Russian government, and elements of the Wagner Group itself, have likely been further eroded. Furthermore, the direct involvement of Belarusian President Lukashenko in halting the military advance on Moscow is considered humiliating for Putin and might have granted Lukashenko some unforeseen benefits.

ISW states that it would refrain from speculating on the concrete impacts of Prigozhin’s rebellion and the Kremlin’s weak response, but it does hint at the potential for substantial damage to Putin’s government and the Russian war effort in Ukraine.

You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here


    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!

    Related Posts