Copyright © 2021

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Even ‘good Russians’ should stop being invited to discussions about Ukraine and, if invited, should shut up, ‘Grani’ editors say

Anti-Putin Russian activists abroad waving modified Russian flags symbolizing opposition to their country's aggressive war against Ukraine (Photo:
Anti-Putin Russian activists abroad waving modified Russian flags symbolizing opposition to their country’s aggressive war against Ukraine (Photo:
Even ‘good Russians’ should stop being invited to discussions about Ukraine and, if invited, should shut up, ‘Grani’ editors say

A month ago, Olha Rudenko, editor of The Kyiv Independent, posted on Facebook a comment about an unfortunate characteristic of roundtables held in the West about Ukraine. These meetings almost invariably invite “good” Russians and any discussion about Ukraine is hijacked by them.

Related: 87% of Russians approve potential military attack on EU countries – survey

Her words, not always welcome among Westerners let alone “good” Russians, have now been supported by the editors of the portal who say that she’s right, that Russians even “good” ones, shouldn’t be taking part in such discussions and that, if they’re invited, they should shut up.

Related: For Russians, their war in Ukraine is still ‘a TV war’ not directly involving them, Fedorov says

Rudenko’s words, especially now that they have been seconded by the portal, are important and deserve extensive quotation.

Related: All surveys since start of Ukrainian war show Putin’s standing among Russians up, ‘Nezavisimaya Gazeta’ reports

She posted her comment on the basis of her impressions, “not always pleasant,” of taking part in conferences about Ukraine, Putin’s war there, and the Ukrainian media across Europe. Here are the key passages of her remarks lightly edited for readability:

In the West, the Russian and Ukrainian narratives are still very strongly mixed. Russians are invited to roundtables about the reconstruction of Ukraine for some reason. You know, the ‘good’ Russians.


And with the Russians and without them, any conversation about Ukraine quickly turns into a conversation about the problems of Russia and Russian society. This is a great challenge for us now: to tell the world that we don’t need this and we can’t mix. Now, this is not just wrong; it is extremely inappropriate. The whole war is about the fact that Ukraine is not Russia. Ukrainians die for that every day.


In part this mixing happens because Russia’s attack on Ukraine led not only to what the West discovered about the brave and extraordinary Ukrainians but also to increased interest in Russia and Russian culture. Obviously, people are wondering how ‘the mysterious Russian soul’ explains all this.


Of course, it is important for our future that Russia is reborn into something normal. But that doesn’t mean that every conversation about Ukraine [should be] a conversation about Russia. Such mixing is a shameful and humiliating practice that directly follows both old Soviet and more recent Kremlin narratives.


Ukraine can’t wait until Russian society heals. The Russian military will not be stopped by media literacy and VPN for Russians. They will be stopped by javelins, NLAWs, and long-distance artillery. Before Russia can be treated, it must be stopped.


Russian liberals and independent media overwhelmingly seem to feel no responsibility at all for what is happening … They have the inherent view of themselves as the hero victim and don’t ask ‘where did we go wrong?’


Even foreigners close to us do not understand why we do not love ‘good Russians’ and are surprised when Ukrainians criticize liberal Russians … The West willingly accepts the Russians’ self-evaluation and tells Ukrainians ‘don’t argue with good Russians; you’ll need them.’ It’s not entirely clear for what, because they have contributed so little so far.


It’s hard for me to restrain myself when Russians say they are ‘victims of propaganda.’ Calling them “victims” removes all responsibility from then. But when 70+ percent of society supports the killing of civilians and a war of aggression, they are not victims, they are potential killers. So that propaganda could make killers out of people, they must either have darkness or emptiness in them from the beginning. In 30 years, Russian society has not created values to fill this void, and so it is filled by Solovyev and Simonyan [top propagandists of the Russian state – Editor]. Ukrainian society in contrast has created values, an identity and a national idea, all at a great price.


All this is clear to us; but quite obviously to the outside world, including societies and communities who support us, it is not. The world finally found out who we Ukrainians are, but we still have to work hard to explain to it who we are not.

Read More:

You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here

    Related Posts