Copyright © 2024

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Western media again fall for Kremlin myth of “Ukrainian separatism”

Ukrainian separatism
During a protest against Russian occupation on 5 March 2022, a Kherson man jumped on a Russian armed vehicle with a Ukrainian flag. Screenshot from video.
Western media again fall for Kremlin myth of “Ukrainian separatism”
Article by: Yuriy Prymachuk
Edited by: Michael Garrood
Separatists allied with Russia,” “pro-Moscow official,” “breakaway republics,” “separatist leader“: this is not Russian newspeak but quotes from Western media to describe quisling officials from Russia’s newly-occupied territories in Ukraine.

Eight years ago, using the mechanisms of information warfare, Russia managed to persuade many people that residents of Ukraine’s easternmost Donbas region had an actual separatist movement while Moscow simply helped them. Now the Kremlin is trying to apply the same strategy again.

To counter the separatism narrative, Ukrainians are conducting a Twitter campaign under the hashtag #NoSeparatistsInUkraine, launched by Ukrainian political analyst Maria Zolkina. While the Crimean occupation case is better known, the situation on the Ukrainian mainland remains overshadowed. So here are the arguments for why there is no actual separatism in Ukraine.

Why “Ukrainian separatism” is no more than a cover for Russian aggression
Pro-Ukrainian rally in Donetsk (2014) featuring mottos “Donetsk is Ukraine” and “East and West together.” Source: RFE/RL

Despite a lot of economic challenges, Ukraine had no ethnic conflicts in the 1990s

In 1991, Ukraine was lucky enough to avoid internal conflicts such as occurred in the contested Nagorno Karabakh in Azerbaijan. While the inclusion of Karabakh within the confines of the Azerbaijan nation-state was unacceptable to many Armenians, Ukraine had no strict ethnic divisions.

Instead, 91% of the Ukrainian population voted for independence in 1991, including more than 80% of people in every southern and eastern region.

Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts in the 1990s were among the centers of protest activity, albeit generally of an economic nature. The collapse of the USSR caused a severe economic crisis, leaving Ukrainian miners without salaries and social support. In 1993, they launched a general strike in Donbas, with these protests being subsequently repeated almost annually.

Political demands appeared only once, in 1993, when protesters demanded economic autonomy for the two Donbas oblasts. Their local councils had even conducted a survey on this topic. However, according to historian Dmytro Snegiriev, in this case, local authorities were exploiting the people for their own material benefit.

This was indirectly proven after 1993 when protesters merely voiced economic demands. In 1998, Donbas miners staged a march on Kyiv, seeking the attention of the government. Later their protests in Luhansk were brutally dispersed by the regional Berkut police unit, reportedly backed by local political elites.

Miners from the Donbas region marching on Kyiv, 1998.

The main reason for the absence of real separatism in the East of Ukraine is apparent: in contrast to Catalans or Kurds, there are no separate Donetsk or Luhansk nations or languages. People from these oblasts are widely regarded as ordinary Ukrainians, and become successfully integrated into local communities in Kyiv and other cities.

Writers Serhiy Zhadan from Luhansk and Iren Rozdobudko from Donetsk; Ivan Dziuba, a linguist and dissident from the south of Donetsk Oblast; and Serhiy Rebrov, football player and coach born in a Donetsk suburb (later he would become the legend of the football club Dynamo Kyiv) are among the brightest examples of famous Ukrainians from the two eastern oblasts.

Serhiy Zhadan presents his book Voroshilovgrad
Serhiy Zhadan presents his book Voroshylovhrad (the Soviet name for Luhansk). Source: Kharkiv.Today

It would be an exaggeration to fully deny the existence of secessionists in Donbas. While several local separatist organizations operated there in the 2010s, they had no actual influence. The Donetsk Republic movement was founded in 2005 and even declared independence for Donbas. However, before 2014 their rallies would only attract about 40-50 people.

Local elections in Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts in 2006 and 2010 were the best proof. No secessionist parties were elected to local councils, although some deputies had pro-Russian views. The result was similar in the southern oblasts of Kherson, Mykolayiv, Zaporizhzhia, and Odesa.

This situation is in stark contrast to Catalonia, where the parliamentary majority is formed by openly irredentist parties and citizens stage mass pro-independence rallies.

The case of “Ukrainian separatism” was artificially created in 2004 for political purposes

The relatively peaceful Ukrainian situation was intentionally undermined during the 2004 presidential race. Political elites were desperate to secure the victory for their nominee Viktor Yanukovych (a native of Donbas). Unable to solve Ukrainian economic problems, the Party of Regions resorted to divide and rule tactics.

Seeking to mobilize voters in the South and East, Yanukovych`s staff made use of a narrative, according to which Russian-speaking industrial regions were suffering from discrimination in Ukraine and needed to fight for the candidate who would protect them from western compatriots.

The most notorious examples of this propaganda were posters with claims that Viktor Yushchenko (a candidate more popular in the western region) saw the inhabitants of the east as third-class citizens (it was done to scare the voters).

Infamous poster of the Yanukovych campaign dividing Ukrainians into three grades designed in the style of Yushchenko's campaign to denigrate the political rival. Source: CHESNO movement
Infamous poster of the Yanukovych campaign dividing Ukrainians into three grades designed in the style of Yushchenko’s campaign to denigrate the political rival. Source: CHESNO movement

Another example of agitation was spreading fake leaflets with Yushchenko’s name promising a “national dictatorship”, eradication of the Russian language, and repression of national minorities.

At the same time, Yanukovych’s team staged a brutal electoral fraud, with protests against it leading to the Orange Revolution. The Party of Regions responded by convening a congress in Sievierodonetsk, which threatened to create an autonomous republic and called referendums in Luhansk and Donetsk.

These tensions are often cited as a turning point and proof of “two Ukraines”: a pro-European West and pro-Russian East.

But in reality, it was more a political struggle involving two parties than a real civil conflict. Later in 2005, elected president Yushchenko and Yanukovych signed a joint memorandum (without mentioning any autonomy). The Party of Regions voted for Yushchenko’s nominee for the prime minister post, while investigations concerning Sievierodonetsk never resulted in custodial sentences. The following year Yushchenko nominated Yanukovych and the latter became head of the government.

Viktor Yushchenko (left) and Viktor Yanukovych (right). Source: RFE/RL

To compare, it would be hard to imagine Carles Puigdemont, leader of Catalan independence supporters, abandoning his case in exchange for a post in the government of the united Spanish state.

The best argument for the absence of actual separatism in Ukraine was public opinion. With the end of the Euromaidan in March 2014, the International Republican Institute conducted a poll which showed that only 2% of people in the South and 4% in the East supported the division of Ukraine and the creation of new states.

The overwhelming majority supported the country’s unitary status. It is noteworthy that some people were ready to accept the loss of Crimea, but did not want their region to follow suit.

But in 2014 Kremlin used it as a pretext for seizing Ukrainian territories

The absence of strong separatist movements did not prevent Russia from taking advantage of this occasion after the Revolution of Dignity, using hybrid tactics with mass propaganda and involving local pro-Kremlin movements.

However, in the southern oblasts (Kherson, Odesa, Mykolayiv, and Zaporizhzhia) pro-Russian demonstrations failed. In each of them, pro-Ukrainian rallies were more numerous, demonstrating support for the unity of Ukraine.

For example, in Zaporizhzhia, previously seen as a pro-Russian city by Kremlin planners, activists pelted separatist supporters with flour and eggs, disrupting their protests. In Odesa, it resulted in street clashes, with the situation subsequently stabilizing.

Pro-Russian protesters pelted with flour and eggs in Zaporizhzhia in 2014. Source: National Corps

Pro-European and pro-Ukrainian candidate Petro Poroshenko then won the next presidential election in all these oblasts.

The situation in Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts was more complicated, but not because of broad support for separatism.

Actually, Donetsk residents organized large-scale pro-Ukrainian rallies, the biggest bringing 10,000 people out onto the streets. Pro-Russian residents also held meetings, but none of them reached that figure. Then the non-locals appeared.

“Apart from the 200 communists dreaming about the USSR, criminals, and marginals from depressed areas brought by Sasha the Dentist [nickname of former President Yanukovych`s son], appeared, joined by “guests” from Belgorod and Rostov,” said journalist Tetyana Zarovna, former Donetsk resident.

Indeed, the media cited local citizens claiming unknown people with a Russian accent in Donetsk.

As an example of outsiders’ role, one of the rallies featured “miners” wearing construction helmets instead of miners’ ones – the difference would be obviously apparent in a mining region.

Finally, pro-Russian forces succeeded by applying terror, just like the Taliban or Islamic State. On April 13, they attacked a peaceful pro-Ukrainian rally in Donetsk, beating people with batons and killing one activist. Then a series of kidnappings and murders started (including the murders of local councilor Volodymyr Rybak, student Yuriy Popravka, Pentecostals in Sloviansk). The large pro-Ukrainian majority could not express its position and often had to leave.

Pro-Russian unrest in Donetsk, 2014. Source: Roman Sushchenko

All of this helped militants seize Donetsk (as well as Luhansk) proclaiming the so-called “DNR-LNR”.

Russia created and supported so-called “DNR-LNR” while denying this fact

The Ukrainian state could not quickly restore order in Donetsk, remaining concentrated on the important city of Sloviansk. In April 2014, Sloviansk was captured by Igor Girkin, a Russian citizen, and a group of militants. As Girkin himself admitted, no “DNR-LNR” would emerge without it.

“After all, I pulled the trigger of the war. If our detachment had not crossed the border everything would have ended as in Kharkiv and Odesa,” he said in an interview.

It is the reason why Ukrainians don’t consider the so-called “DNR-LNR” as separatists but as Russian proxy forces. Only with the use of Russian support (including military one) did they manage to seize part of the two oblasts and establish their own governing bodies there.

Tank of so-called “DNR” (2015), a proof that the militants are well supplied by armored vehicles and matériel. Source: RFE/RL

The same stance was taken by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, which adopted Resolution № 2133 in 2016, calling “DNR-LNR”: “created, supported and effectively controlled [which means indirect leadership without formal recognition of occupation] by the Russian Federation”. The Venice Commission later also cited this conclusion. There is a large quantity of direct evidence:

  • The Russians indirectly control these territories. According to Radio Liberty, Dmitry Kozak, deputy head of the Russian presidential administration, serves as the main curator of “DNR-LNR”. The deputy head of the so-called “government” in Donetsk is Vladimir Pashkov, who until 2014 had held a similar position in Irkutsk Oblast. Pashkov regularly reports to Moscow.

This explains why the so-called “Donbas separatism” ends immediately behind the frontline. For eight years, no serious separatist parties or movements arose in the Ukraine-controlled territories of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts (not to mention the South). On the contrary, the residents of Rubizhne, occupied in 2022, staged a protest under the yellow-blue flag after being deported to occupied Luhansk.

Ukrainian separatism
Pro-Ukrainian rally in Donetsk, May 2014. Source: NGO Crimea SOS
Now, in 2022 it remains important not only as historical truth but to understand why the Ukrainian government and society refuse to even discuss the scenario of “Minsk-3”, a peace deal that would keep currently occupied territories under Russian control. For them, it does not mean delayed diplomatic victory but rather the repeat of the “DNR-LNR” situation, which would allow Russia to terrorize civilians and establish its full control.

Why Ukraine needs rocket artillery to win the war ~~

Yuriy Prymachuk is a freelance journalist and editor from Ukraine. He received a master’s degree in Institute of Journalism, Kyiv, interned in Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, worked as a journalist and editor in political and economic fields.

Read more:

Edited by: Michael Garrood
You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here

    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!

    Related Posts