Copyright © 2024

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Two important results of Ukraine’s ban of VKontakte Russian social network

Source: Appleapple
Two important results of Ukraine’s ban of VKontakte Russian social network
In May 2017, the President of Ukraine put into effect a decision of the National Security and Defence Council (RNBO) to impose economic sanctions on 468 Russian companies. The largest Russian social network, Vkontakte (VK), was banned, among others. Last year, Ukrainian analysts working for the NATO StratCom analyzed more than 300,000 Ukrainian VK user profiles to define the results and efficiency of the ban. Amid a threefold decline in the number of active users, analysts also came to another surprising conclusion in their report: the remaining VK users have become more interconnected, radicalized and anti-Ukrainian. The case is important to develop other more effective policies countering Russian propaganda and disinformation

The Ukrainian Law “On Sanctions” states that sanctions have been imposed in order “to protect the national security and territorial integrity of Ukraine, to counteract terrorism, and to prevent violations of the rights, freedoms, and interests of the citizens, society, and state of Ukraine”. The largest Internet companies banned include the Russian social networks VKontakte (VK) and Odnoklassniki, the search engine company Yandex (including its sites using the .ua domain), and the email service According to SimilarWeb, the audience for VK in Ukraine decreased by more than 60% as a result of the ban.

Top Sites Ranking for All Categories in Ukraine. Source: here and below all images from the report

Because the ban does not apply to the territories occupied by Russia, the study determined two target regions: government-controlled areas (GCA) subject to the ban, and non-government-controlled areas (NGCA) where the ban was not imposed (Crimea, DNR, and LNR).

Posting dynamics over time

The ban was effective in some aspects, particularly for the decrease of actively involved users. It’s clearly visible by the number of posts per day. Before the ban, the total number reached 101,000 posts per day. After the ban, the mean number of posts decreased to 38,000 on average. Since April 2018, the traffic decreased by 10,000 again and stabilized at that level. Thus, the period of study (between 1 May 2016 and 14 June 2018) was divided into three intervals: before the ban, the first ‘user exodus’, and the second ‘user exodus’.

Posting Dynamics During the Research Period

The first user exodus could be explained by law-abiding citizens’ rejection of VK, and by the inability of the rest to use virtual private networks [VPNs]. The second wave may have been caused by those who remained realizing they had lost their audiences, making activity on VK less interesting to them.

The user exodus doesn’t necessarily mean that users have deleted their accounts but ceased to post anything in the network. Both waves of users leaving VK were accompanied by peaks of activity on other social media. There was a significant surge in the use of Facebook search queries in mid-May 2017, and two spikes in the use of Telegram search queries in May 2017 and April 2018.

Relative Frequency of Search Queries Related to Vkontakte, Facebook, and Telegram in Ukraine

The average age of users (as stated on their profiles) did not change in the occupied areas, while the average age of users in the GCA decreased in 1.7 years on average. This may have been a result of younger people using mobile phones to browse the internet and access the social network, compounded by the fact that older people may be less familiar with VPNs, which could help them get around the ban.

Connections Between a Sample of 2000 Random Users from the GCA

A social graph above, depicting the connections between ~ 2 000 random users from the GCA, was created to analyze the user exodus in greater detail. Only active users were included in the sample. As shown in the diagram, the most-connected users, located in the central part of the graph, mostly continued to use VK (marked red), while less-connected
users, located on the periphery, left the social network during either the first exodus (marked green) or the second exodus (marked yellow). In addition, users who posted more frequently were also more likely to stay (the majority of large nodes are red).

Distribution of Number of Friends per User Before and After Ban

Despite a large number of users left the network, those who remained have become more densely connected, acquiring more friends and subscribing for more groups. This is the trend both for GCA and NGCA, but for the GCA it’s stronger.

Dominating ideology in the Network before and after the ban

From quite diverse ideological posts with strong Russian presence before the ban, the VK infosphere has changed to predominantly Russian or pro-Russian.

To identify ideologically-tinged traffic, researchers created two random samples of about 300,000 posts for before and after the ban. The posts sampled were written in Russian or Ukrainian only, were longer than 140 characters, and were not marked as spam. The number of unique users was 75,089 in the first sample and 48,766 in the second set. Among these, 91.6% of profiles were located in the GCA before the ban, but only 84.6% remained after the ban.

Several main clusters of ideological posts were identified in the before and after ban samples as well as their share in each sample defined. The number of ideological posts after the ban increased by 1.22 times compared with the period before the ban.

Cluster Dendrogram with main clusters of ideological posts before and after the ban

Main clusters of ideological posts are depicted on the Scheme above. It is clear that after the ban the audience of VK has been moving to the pro-Russian infosphere. Several pro-Ukrainian clusters (“Pro-Ukrainian rhetoric”, “Patrol Police”) disappeared at all, while others decreased in the number of posts (“Ukraine news”). Pro-Russian clusters, conversely, increased in their size (“Pro-Russian propaganda”, “DNR and LNR”), and several new Russian emerged (“Russia news”, “Donald Tramp and the USA”).

Most of user accounts posting about ideological issues before the ban continued to use VK after the ban, unlike 2/3 of private personal accounts which quit the network. 467 such ideological profiles were identified from both regions. Only 35 profiles from the GCA and four profiles from the NGCA left the network.

The more thorough examination of those who continued to disseminate ideological, usually anti-Ukrainian posts after the ban, reveals that the share of small accounts posting ideological posts (less than 50) has increased 17 times after the ban, while a share of those large posting more than 1500 ideological posts decreased 2,5 times. This means that small profiles of individuals have become more involved in disseminating ideological messages than large pages.

Ideological users have also become significantly more interconnected than typical users after the ban. While the typical user had on average 195 friends before the ban and 217 after the ban, the number of friends for an ideological user grew from 197 to 501.

Further threats

Despite the considerable success of threefold decline in the general number of posts (which corresponds to the decline in the number of users), the remaining users have become yet more ideologically active and pro-Russian. They have lost any opposition or alternative views in the network, which could make them less radical before. Also, they’ve become more interconnected after the ban. A kind of informational bubble was created for those users who still use VK. The same messages are posted and reposted by remaining users and the twofold result follows: the general population has become more disconnected from Russian propaganda, while remaining minority yet more embedded in it.

Read also:

You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here

    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!

    Related Posts