Copyright © 2024

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

How pro-Kremlin think tanks spread propaganda in the West

hybrid analytica: Study discloses wide network of Russian think-tanks involved in propaganda in the West
How pro-Kremlin think tanks spread propaganda in the West
With years, the Kremlin keeps increasing its efforts to exert its soft power tools and extensive networks in order to undermine the Western politics and media discourse. State funding of the Russian propaganda machine increases by around 30% annually, according to the report titled Hybrid Analytica: Pro-Kremlin Expert Propaganda in Moscow, Europe and the US: A Case Study on Think Tanks and Universities by Dr. Kateryna Smagliy, with a contribution from Ilya Zaslavskiy. The Institute of Modern Russia (IMR) published the study last October.
Dr. Kateryna Smagliy

According to the paper, the critical element of Russia’s hybrid warfare is information warfare, defined as “a comprehensive and concerted state-sponsored influence campaign designed to steer social debate, hijack political, social and media narratives, and distort information context.”

The report examines the structure of Kremlin’s propaganda-related institutions and their connections with Western and Russian academia, as well as their co-optation into the pool of proxy communicators for the Putin regime. The authors conclude that the current Russian government pursues a coherent “knowledge weaponization” strategy.

Information warfare aims to influence decision-making in the West in a way that would validate the interests of the ruling Russian kleptocracy.
The report details how Kremlin-linked think tanks design ideological doctrines and how Kremlin sympathizers promote pro-Kremlin propaganda narratives in the West.

Hybrid analytica

According to the report, the Kremlin’s “knowledge weaponization strategy” has five inter-related components.

  • The Kremlin engages domestic think tanks in the design of the communication strategies.
  • It established influence centers abroad, operating as organizations of various types such as think tanks, academic Russian study and cultural centers, associations of Russian-speaking immigrants etc.
  • The Kremlin uses private actors to promote its interests in the West.
  • In information warfare, it relies on Russian intelligence and infiltrates other countries via the network of agents of influence.
  • The mass media is used as multipliers, promoters and/or validators of pro-Kremlin narratives and messaging.

These efforts combined led to the rise of the “hybrid analytica,” defined in the paper as the process of creation and promotion of pseudo-academic narratives by duped or manipulated academics, experts, or political “lobbyists in disguise,” recruited through the global network of the Kremlin-linked operatives.

The hybrid analytica is used to support and accommodate the agenda of the Putin regime. According to the paper, this results in the “demolition of factuality, disinformation, intentional misinterpretation of events, undermined trust in expertise, and overall pollution of the policymaking and public debate environment.”

The Kremlin’s Web of Hybrid Analytica. The infographic illustrates the network of Russian and Western academic/research institutions that collectively promote pro-Kremlin propaganda narratives. Click on the image for its high-resolution version or download it as a PDF file.


The report identifies how the Russian state-owned think tanks that are tied to the ruling elite preserve Putin’s grip on power, developing policy recommendations for Russian state officials, public experts, and the media.

The Russian state has infiltrated social and political debates in the West by opening its own Europe and US-based think tanks, such as the Dialogue for Civilizations Institute in Berlin, the Institute for Democracy and Cooperation in Paris, and the Center of Global Interests in Washington D.C.

Rossotrudnichestvo, the Russkiy Mir Foundation, and the Gorchakov Fund – the Russian “soft power” organizations – have established numerous centers of Russian studies at European and American universities for promoting Russia’s cultural diplomacy and broadening the network of Kremlin sympathizers within Western academia.

Various Kremlin-linked oligarchs (Mikhail Fridman, Viktor Vekselberg, Alisher Usmanov and others) poured millions of dollars into Russian “soft power” instruments, Western think tanks, and universities. Such investments are aimed to protect the Kremlin’s positions internationally as well as protect their personal business interests.

The paper has also found that several Western think tanks such as the Center for the National Interest (CFTNI) and the Kennan Institute “have started following pro-Kremlin narratives or become involved in direct political lobbying on behalf of the Russian state.”

Meanwhile, the Kremlin goes after its critics and ideological opponents. For example, in 2018, a Russian group affiliated with the Russian government attempted to hack into the computers of the Hudson Institute, active in investigations of corruption in Russia.

Another finding is that the professional background of Russian experts and chiefs of Kremlin-linked Russian think tanks indicates their extensive ties to Russian intelligence agencies.

The study has also concluded that EU and US sanctions against Russia have not only considerably restrained Russia’s international political contacts, but have simultaneously created additional professional opportunities for Russian and Western intellectuals.

“At the background of Russia’s deteriorating relations with the West, they suddenly found themselves at the very heart of “track II diplomacy” efforts. Russia’s invitations to the Valdai Club, as well as its generosity and first-class hospitality, have proved hard to decline,” reads the report.

Such Russian actions have shaped the phenomenon of Putinverstehers – a growing number of the Western Putin supporters who often excuse their participation in Russian agitprop fora, saying “we must deal with them in order to understand them.


The authors have developed a set of recommendations for Western governments, institutions, and civil society on combatting Russian hybrid analytica.

According to the paper, the Western governments should officially acknowledge the threat posed by Russia’s information warfare and re-focus financial support for Russia-related academic programs “from culture and history to in-depth analysis of Russia’s authoritarianism, kleptocracy and corrupt practices, such as state-sponsored propaganda and information warfare, militant foreign policy, violations of international law, and abuse of human rights.”

Another recommendation for the governments is to urge education and research institutions to freeze on cooperation and accepting donations from Russian “soft power” organizations like Rossotrudnichestvo. The institutions should update their due diligence rules to prevent any forms of malign Russian influence through Kremlin-friendly oligarchs.

The report calls on civil society and the expert community to monitor academic and research institutions in order to reveal propaganda content disguised as scholarly debates, and to further investigate the extent of connections between the Kremlin and the Western expert community. Special attention should be paid to sources of funding and affiliations of the media outlets that publish analytical Russia-related content. Western journalists and scholars should remember that Russia’s Federal Security Service or FSB traditionally targets them at forums, conferences, festivals, and sporting events held in Russia to recruit them as agents of influence.

Read the full text of the report “Hybrid Analytica: Pro-Kremlin Expert Propaganda in Moscow, Europe and the US: A Case Study on Think Tanks and Universities” on the website of the Institute of Modern Russia.

Read also:

You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here

    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!